Royal Enfield’s J-platform Bikes: Real-world Performance Compared
- by Praveen M
- Oct 5, 2022
- | Views: 26387
We pit the bikes under the new J-platform family against each other: the Classic 350, Hunter 350 and the Meteor 350 to see which one’s the sportiest in the real world
After the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 and the Royal Enfield Classic 350, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 becomes the latest member of the J platform family. The question, then, is which one is the fastest, the most fuel efficient and which one is ideal for whom? We find out:
Acceleration And Roll-on Numbers:
Acceleration / Roll-on acceleration |
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
Royal Enfield Classic 350 |
Royal Enfield Meteor 350 |
0-60kmph |
5.24 seconds |
5.71 seconds |
5.29 seconds |
0-80kmph |
9.16 seconds |
9.53 seconds |
8.94 seconds |
0-100kmph |
16.40 seconds |
16.30 seconds |
14.81 seconds |
30-70kmph in 3rd gear |
6.47 seconds |
6.97 seconds |
6.46 seconds |
40-80kmph in 4th gear |
8.87 seconds |
9.46 seconds |
8.67 seconds |
While all the three are powered by the same J1-349 motor producing the same power and torque, Royal Enfield has tweaked the internals to suit the character of the bikes. The Meteor has the sportiest tune and that’s evident in the numbers too. Its engine is eager to rev, and you can triple digit speeds on the highways effortlessly.
On the other hand, the lighter chassis on the Hunter helps it accelerate quicker, but its momentum slows down at higher speeds. Its peppy engine and the inherent lightness makes it perfect for city riders.
The Classic is the most Enfield-like bike here. The engine feels relaxed, and it’s got a nice wave of mid-range torque. It’s the perfect bike if you just feel like cruising around and enjoying the sights.
Fuel Efficiency:
Fuel Efficiency |
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
Royal Enfield Classic 350 |
Royal Enfield Meteor 350 |
City |
40.19kmpl |
41.55kmpl |
41.88kmpl |
Highway |
35.97kmpl |
37.77kmpl |
38.77kmpl |
Even though the Hunter is around 10-14 kilos lighter than the Meteor and the Classic, its mileage numbers are slightly lower. The difference isn’t a lot but we think it is the initial pep that is hurting the Hunter in this regard. No surprises that the Meteor is the most fuel efficient member of the trio on the highway as it was built for sustaining triple digit speeds effortlessly.
Braking:
Braking |
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
Royal Enfield Classic 350 |
Royal Enfield Meteor 350 |
80-0kmph |
32.08m |
31.93m |
34.01m |
60-0kmph |
18.13m |
18.01m |
19.12m |
The difference between the Classic’s and the Hunter’s stopping performance isn’t substantial and that is a slight downer for the Hunter. You see, it is supposed to be 14kg lighter and run on grippier tyres, but that isn’t making much of a difference.
- Take a look at Royal Enfield Classic 350 price
- Here's the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price
- Check out Royal Enfield Meteor 350 price
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
Royal Enfield Classic 350 |
Royal Enfield Meteor 350 |
|
Weight |
181kg, kerb |
195kg, kerb |
191kg, kerb |
We think the Hunter could do with a pair of stickier rubber and in turn braking should improve. Having said that, all three bikes lack great brake feel and feedback, which isn’t that great considering this was supposed to be an all-new platform for the 21st century.
Conclusion:
Looking at the numbers, it is quite evident that the most premium member of the lot does turn out to have the most impressive numbers. And as someone who wants a great cruising experience, there’s nothing quite as good at this price and segment.
The Hunter is for new riders who want an accessible bike that’s light and nimble on its feet, and is not as intimidating as the heavyweight Classic or the Meteor. While we expected more from it, we think that a few critical mods – like tyres – should make its experience much better.
Lastly, the Classic 350 remains the best bet for those who want a smooth and easy ride. The new model is perhaps the best bike of the lot and a lot of members in our office have fallen head over heels for it.