Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

sponsored Star Key Highlights Sponsored

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Rocker RedRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroHero Moto Corp Mavrick 440 Base
Max Torque 52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm 36 Nm @ 4000 rpm

Continental GT 650 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Rocker RedRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroHero Moto Corp Mavrick 440 Base
Rating
729 reviews
1335 reviews
48 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Royal Enfield Hero Moto Corp
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 3.19 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.99 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Single Cylinder, Air-Oil cooled, SOHC Engine
Max Power 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 27.36 PS @ 6000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Hero Moto Corp Mavrick 440 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer ... Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 8,734 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 5,733 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 22,486 Continental GT 650 Insurance Rs. 4,272 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 20,738 Mavrick 440 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Single Cylinder, Air-Oil cooled, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
647.95 cc
349.34 cc
440 cc
Max Power
47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
27.36 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
36 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
78 mm
75 mm
79.6 mm
Stroke
67.8 mm
85.8 mm
88.4 mm
No Of Cylinders
2
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Digital spark ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.5:1
9.65:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
27 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
...
Top Speed
...
114 kmph
...

Tyre Size
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-R18
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi
...

Seat height
...
790 mm
803 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2119*780*1067 mm3
2055*800*1055 mm3
2100*868*1112 mm3
Wheelbase
1398 mm
1370 mm
1388 mm
Length
2119 mm
2055 mm
2100 mm
Ground Clearance
174 mm
...
175 mm
Height
1067 mm
1055 mm
1112 mm
Width
780 mm
800 mm
868 mm
Fuel Capacity
12.5 Liters
13 Liters
13.5 Liters
Kerb Weight
214 Kg
177 Kg
191 Kg
Total Weight
400 kg
360 kg
...
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
300 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
240 mm
153 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
Paper element, Forced lubrication, Wet sump with pump driven oil delivery
...
Air filtration - Wet paper pleated type, connected x secure - Geo-Fence,Vehicle Diagnosis, and Location Sharing. Track your vehicle,access roadside assistance
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
...
...
12V / 8AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
Bulb
LED

ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
...
Body Type
Cafe Racer Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
...
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
...
Display
...
...
Speedometer
...
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
...
Digital
...
Trip Meter
...
Digital
Digital
Gradeability
24 degrees
...
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
...
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
...
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
...
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
...
DRLs
...
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Classic retro styling appeals to many
  • Not-too-aggressive riding posture
  • Great handling & nice exhaust note
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Could have better brakes
  • Clutch is on slightly heavier side
  • Customisation options are limited
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Continental GT 650, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Hero Moto Corp Mavrick 440

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Continental GT 650 Vs Hunter 350 Vs Hero Moto Corp Mavrick 440 FAQs

Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 by Rs. 1.69 Lakh.

Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

For the Rocker Red version, 647.95 cc Petrol engine of Continental GT 650 produces 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

×
Recently Visited
Select Category