-
Suzuki Gixxer question
Q.
Which one is better Gixxer or Apache RTR 160 4V?
![]()
Bryan
| 5 days ago
Hen it came down to choosing a fun 160cc motorcycle, the Suzuki Gixxer was our pick of the lot. It made a lot of sense for those who wanted to ride to the hills on Sunday and commute to work on a Monday. There's a new motorcycle in the segment now, the TVS Apache RTR 160 4v; one that promises this and a lot more. Will the reigning champion of the segment have cause to worry then?The Suzuki Gixxer is such a lively motorcycle that it's hard to ignore it. Its peppy motor, lightweight and flickable nature makes it a delight in the city and if that's the boundary that you are going to stick to, the Gixxer still makes a lot of sense. As much as we love the Gixxer, it is dethroned by the TVS Apache RTR 160 4v. It is equally well built, makes more power and handles better when you turn the wick up. And it does all of this in a calm manner. At Rs 95,237 OTR Mumbai, the Apache is priced a shade below the Gixxer SP (Rs 97,000) and that pretty much seals the deal in favour of the TVS, the new segment king!.
...Read More
2
Reply
Jaish
| 2 weeks ago
For long term performance only suzuki brand
1
Reply
-
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V question
Q.
Apache RTR 160 4V or Gixxer SF 155, which one is best for day to day riding and low maintenance?
Yash
| 1 week ago
Hey there !First i would like to tell you that GIXXER SF is a fully faired bike while APACHE 160 4V is a naked city commuter.So gixxer sf has hands on here as it has good aerodynamics. If you want a feel of big bike I'll definitely suggest you the GIXXER SF.NOW coming to on paper specsGixxer sf churns out 14.6 bhp at 8000 rpm and torque is 14 Nm at 6000 rpm.Whereas. Apache churns out 16.5 ps at 8000 rpmWhile torque is14.8 Nm @ 6500 rpm.While mileage of both the bikes remain nearly same at 45–50 kmplPlease take note that mileage depends on riding conditions too.Both the bikes are available with Fi as optional while gixxer sf also has ABS as option.Gixxer also has ABS option with carb variant.Thus becoming much feasible to buy.Apache has punchier engine than gixxer sf due to more power and slightly more torque but in terms of engine refinement GIXXER SF hold its place here.Gixxer sf also has better low end. mid range capabilities than apache 160 4v
...Read More
3
Reply
Shubham
| 2 weeks ago
160 4V but bro Apache will not give you satisfaction!! Bike is not value for money meri toh pulsar kesa sound kr rhi h abhi 1 yr bhi nhi hua or iski problem solve hi nhi ho rhi bilkul preshaan kr diya h even engineers bhi khe rhe h tvs k ki 200 and 160 bekar h
...Read More
2
Reply
Rohan
| 2 weeks ago
It's your personal choice get a test ride of both bikes see which suits your riding style , if u want to know anything specific about Apache I can help you .
1
Reply
Sasidhar
| 1 week ago
Apache 160 4v
0
Reply
View 2 More Answer
View 4 More Answers
-
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 question
Q.
Which one is better in terms of mileage, performance, quality and comfortable between Suzuki Gixxer 250 and TVS Apache RR 310.
![]()
Zigwheels
| 2 weeks ago
The prices of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and TVS Apache RR 310 starts from Rs. 1.71 lakhs and Rs. 2.27 lakh respectively. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 30 km/l and for the TVS Apache RR 310 is 31 km/l. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc Oil Cooled, Single-Cylinder, 4-Valve, SOHC engine which produces 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm whereas TVS Apache RR 310 is powered by 312.2 cc Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, Reverse Inclined DOHC, SI engine which produces way better power of 34 PS @ 9700 rpm. The 800mm high rider’s seat of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250, allows even 5’6” riders to get their feet down flat. The split seats suggest sportiness, but its width and cushioning suggest adequate comfort for your companion. On the other hand, Apache RR 310 has a seat height of 810 mm which is 10 mm more than the Gixxer SF 250 but is comfortable enough. Also, TVS has also done a smart thing to ensure more comfortable city riding. For more comparison between these two, click on the link: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/suzuki-gixxer-250-vs-tvs-akula-310
...Read More
1
Reply
-
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V question
Q.
What is the difference between carburator dual disc and Fi dual disc?
![]()
Yash
| 2 weeks ago
Carburettor vehicles are usually cheaper and and any road side mechanic can maintain it.In case of any problem, disconnect the carb and dismantle it, clean it. Most of the problems will get solved. To increase milage or to push your engine to higher speeds all you need to do is adjust the fuel s***w and clean filters whenever required. But most of them are not compliant to BS IV.On the other hand, fuel injected (fi) are bit complicated.You would require a special piece of equipment for servicing fuel injector.If you find any problem with milage or speed, all you need to do is disconnect throttle body and injector, clean it and connect it back. Also in case of some anomalies, you need to service or clean the sensors as well.There are number of sensors, O2 sensor, temperature sensor, knock sensor, which all connect to ECU. And with combined efforts of tlall these, the first system runs.After a certain period of time you also may need to replace fuel pump which is costly as well.But if major problem arises you need to replace or reprogram the ECU, which is a tough task (reprogramming).Also ECU costs a lot, as it manages all the sensors and actuators (injector and throttle).As a conclusion, due to recent increase in sale of fi motorcycles, the prices may have got down but maintenance is as usual, costly. A low CC carb engine should always be preferred over higher CC fi engine.Hope you find your answer.
...Read More
5
Reply
AbhiShek
| 2 weeks ago
Power different and fi have gear indicator to with better mileage than carb
1
Reply
-
Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 question
Q.
My Height is 5.5, looking for bike which would be comfortable to ride with family, I am confused between RTR 160 4v and FZ-S Fi V3?
![]()
Zigwheels
| 1 month ago
Yamaha has offered the new technology with better engine performance on their bikes. FZ S FI Version 3.0 has been enriched with the aggressive stance. FZ-S FI V3.0 gets a single channel ABS which makes it clearly a safe motorcycle. Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 returns ARAI tested 45kmpl being a naked sportbike. The Yamaha FZ S FI V3.0 gets a saddle height of 790mm which could add up to the handling comfort for the shart riders.The RTR 160 4V on the other hand, The Apache RTR 160 4V is fast as it gets a more frugal engine with a better torque, great power figures and handling. The Apache RTR 160 4V has a saddle height of 800mm which might be a slight pinch to the comfort of the short rider. The bike also gets a single channel ABS which makes it safe as well. The Apache looks more aggressive with the DRL and body cladding going the shoulder dynamically.The TVS Apache 160 4V and FZ-S FI V3.0 are too competitive bikes which stance face to face when it comes to the performance. The Apache 160 4V is powered by a 160cc 4Valve engine that churns 16.8 PS of maximum power and 14.9 Nm of peak torque whereas the FZ-S FI V3.0 gets a 149 cc, 2 valves blue core engine with a power figure of 13.2 PS and 12.8 Nm of peak torque. Apache is smooth on the road as the 4 valve engine performs well as compared to the Yamaha blue core engine. As far as the mileage of the bikes is concerned the Apache RTR 160 4V returns an ARAI claimed 60kmpl whereas the Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 returns ARAI tested 53kmpl. This makes it clear that the Apache is way more economical than the FZ-S Fi V3.0.We would suggest you take a test ride of both the bikes to get a better perspective regarding ride quality, comfort and performance of the bikes.Click here for the dealership: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers Click here for the comparison : https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/tvs-apache-rtr-160-vs-yamaha-fz-s-fi-version-30
...Read More
0
Reply
Google
| 3 weeks ago
Go fro RTR. I am using v3.0, it's ride quality is not good, stiff suspension, bumby ride.
0
Reply
Sayan
| 1 month ago
Want power ? Go for rtr 4v . Want comfortable joy ride ? Go for v3
0
Reply
Chris
| 1 month ago
I would tell you go for FZ-S Fi V3
1
Reply
Dr
| 1 month ago
FZ-S fi v3
0
Reply
View 3 More Answers
-
Honda Activa 125 question
Q.
Which scooty should I purchase in May 2019? I am stuck between Access 125, Ntorq and Activa 125?
![]()
Zigwheels
| 1 month ago
The TVS NTORQ 125 is more dedicated towards sporty stance and ergonomics. The NTORQ 125 has been offered with best available features like mobile connectivity, mobile charging, fully digital instrument cluster and aggressive dynamics. The Access 125 and Activa 125 both are more of practical scooters. Both the scooters are offerings of two Japanese giants(Honda and Suzuki) so both the scooters hold smooth and reliable engines. Honda Activa doesn't require much of the introduction as the Activa is already the best product from the brand in terms of scooters. The Suzuki Access is nothing less with the great build quality, amazing ride comfort and classy ergonomics. However, you might be able to get a better perspective if you take a test ride of all the scooters. This will clarify your view regarding the ride quality, comfort, features, build quality and practicality of the scooter.Click here for the dealerships: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
...Read More
0
Reply
Arijit
| 1 month ago
Activa 125 is best as ntorq mileage is low as compared to activa and has fiber body which is not durable as compared to activa's metal body .
0
Reply
Vivek
| 1 month ago
All of these are good but performance and maintenance of Activa 125 wont disappoint you.
0
Reply
Shubhankar
| 1 month ago
Ntorq is better equipped and activa is more reliable
0
Reply
View 2 More Answers
View 4 More Answers
