Indiatimes  |     |  Delhi Online Fair 2010
    ZigWheels
 
Home Buy & Sell News & Features Gallery Special Coverage Interact
Reviews

<< previous   1 2 3 4 5 6    next >>    Untitled Document
Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi Special Coverage
 

Road test: Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi

Adil Jal Darukhanawala     Photography: Kunal Khadse

View: Specs  Ratings

Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi

One of the most eagerly awaited motorcycles of the year is here, and we really had trouble containing our own excitement about the bike till its day of launch. Why, you'd ask...read on to know!

 Related Stories Links
Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi Special Coverage
Numbers game: The new Pulsar 220 vs. the rest!
2009 Edition Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi launched!
Pulsar: Power to the people
2009 Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi: Money Matters
MTV Pulsar Stunt Mania begins!
2009 Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi: Beefed-up Brute!
Road Test: Bajaj Pulsar 220
Road Test:Bajaj Pulsar 200
Bike Shootout: Survival of the FI-ttest!

It is the steep drop on the back straight of Bajaj Auto's fabulous test track at Chakan and I am on my first quick lap astride what is a familiar looking machine. What is not familiar is the way the bike squats and holds firm as we make a rapid descent before beginning the long uphill sweeping left corner to hit the long long long main straight. Earlier Bajaj Pulsars used to wriggle (and weave somewhat) as you wound the throttle and this latter trait was all about bravery coupled to skill on bikes which made the Indian motorcyclist performance oriented.

The new - against all-new - Pulsar 220 DTSi is the bike of dreams for the Indian motorcycling masses, be it for the performance oriented and also majorly for those who want to have something powerful and supremely brilliant to handle in all types of riding conditions.

More in this Article

Page 2 : Suspension and handling

Page 3 : Tarmac-scorching performance

Page 4 : The brains behind the brawn

Page 5 : On the Track

Page 6 : Verdict

Crouched as far as my huge girth would allow, the bike dropped into the section I referred to and just continued on its intended trajectory with no fuss or hint of waver. I was giving myself a chuckle that "boy riding my Yamaha MT-01 had made me into an even better rider" but when I tipped the bike on its side and gave it more throttle than at any times previous at this superb test track, I was howling with delight!

New Pulsar 220 DTS-i

View: Specs  Ratings

 
 

<< previous   1 2 3 4 5 6    next >>   



User's Comments
  • prassanth (21 February 2010 12:36)
    what ever bike u purchase..everything depends on how well its maintained…i purchased a pulsar 220..it was good..initially..but after each service its perfomace came down…mailage went down..pick went down…all this is due to bad quality service provided by bajajs service partners…they just dont care…you know what after my second free service..THEY RETURNED BIKE WITHOUT POURING ENGINE OIL… without this knowledge i drove the bike…for around 20 kms…later i noticed..dash board inticator…and bike perfomance…but to my surprise.this is not a uniqyue case….i came to know from others the same incident happened with themm..tooo…. also one poor guy with an avenbger..one day approched them compainting that engine burned off while riding..they charged them heavily like 9000 for piston repairing…i think these guys are purposefully doing this for generating revenue…this incident happened with the people who purchased pulsar or avanger from sri vinayaka mobikes..located @ hyderabad > secundrabad > tharbund signal… dudes so if you happened to be a customer of these people..then watch out for trouble… others keep away from them… | Reply
  • prashanth (21 February 2010 12:35)
    what ever bike u purchase..everything depends on how well its maintained…i purchased a pulsar 220..it was good..initially..but after each service its perfomace came down…mailage went down..pick went down…all this is due to bad quality service provided by bajajs service partners…they just dont care…you know what after my second free service..THEY RETURNED BIKE WITHOUT POURING ENGINE OIL… without this knowledge i drove the bike…for around 20 kms…later i noticed..dash board inticator…and bike perfomance…but to my surprise.this is not a uniqyue case….i came to know from others the same incident happened with themm..tooo…. also one poor guy with an avenbger..one day approched them compainting that engine burned off while riding..they charged them heavily like 9000 for piston repairing…i think these guys are purposefully doing this for generating revenue…this incident happened with the people who purchased pulsar or avanger from sri vinayaka mobikes..located @ hyderabad > secundrabad > tharbund signal… dudes so if you happened to be a customer of these people..then watch out for trouble… others keep away from them… | Reply
  • suny (13 February 2010 15:31)
    i love 220pulsar n i an mad abt that | Reply
  • Alok Ratnaparkhi  (28 January 2010 16:25)
    this is very perfect analysis, i just want to compair it with new hero honda ZMR , which one is better for outdoor and cityl evel | Reply
  • Sourav Mukherjee (08 December 2009 09:20)
    guys i hv a RD350 and my brother just bought a Pulser 220.....The days he told me that he wants to take me on the road......I JUST LAUGHED.......I was on my 4th gearr and the 220 was all history, forget the 6th gear. Pulser is a good bike, but when it comes to go for marketing and shopping..........NOT FOR RACING ;) | Reply
 raptor (24 February 2010 15:33) Reply to Sourav Mukherjee
u r comparing 350cc rajdoot with 220 cc pulsar... wow!! | Reply
 allen (03 January 2010 23:51) Reply to Sourav Mukherjee
ha ha ha hah a ha ha | Reply
 BASE (06 January 2010 10:52) Reply to allen
rd 350 has a very good acceleration and so it can take on the pulsar at initials but get on a longer drive and see. | Reply
  • Zahed (05 November 2009 21:49)
    I've read about problems regarding the digi-speedo which doesn't show proper figures when wet. Can anyone help me with this? | Reply
 BASE (06 January 2010 10:55) Reply to Zahed
well u have a reboot button. press that and it may help u | Reply
  • jason (17 October 2009 13:50)
    ninja is no doubt a gud bike, but how many of us can afford it. Thats why at the end of the day we look at the pulsars the apaches nd the so called karishmas. The only sport bike within the reach of customers in india is r15. I wud suggest you buy an r15 if u want a sportsbike. | Reply
  • traveller (06 October 2009 12:00)
    We don't need USELESS 'latest technologies' like "oil-cooled engine, digital meter, rear disk brake, LED lights, dtsi " etc. These 'features' are totally crap. No matter its 150 or 250cc, what we need is a twin cylinder engine. | Reply
 jackass (30 October 2009 14:02) Reply to traveller
you must go for lambreta or yezdi... | Reply
  • Aqua (06 October 2009 09:47)
    If you are a true bike enthusiast, don't believe what this reviewers are claiming. They write only positive things about whatever crap that are thrown to them. So don't buy any junk like karishma/Pulsar/Apache and waste money! They are made of cheap parts, includes useless 'advanced features' and most importantly, they have SINGLE cylinder engine. Still many people consider them as 'sports bike'. If you are looking for a good quality sports bike, go for a Kawasaki Ninja 250R. It is more expensive but its worth money. Its DOUBLE cylinder engine will scream upto 14000RPM!!! Can do 0-100 in 6 seconds(remember..its not 0-60!!). Try this on Karishma/Pulsar/Apache. They will go out of steam at 8500RPM. If you think you can't afford NInja, then go for Yamaha R15. In many ways it is technically much better than Ninja. But its single cylinder engine blunts performance. | Reply
 roadmelter (06 March 2010 11:39) Reply to Aqua
u ass hole.....see da price difference...if u so dony care bout da prices...then go buy a yamaha r1!!! | Reply
  • Sam (02 October 2009 12:15)
    Suzuki is value for money. Heard they are coming with 2010 GSR250 Straight twin within short time. Hope we get real stuff which will be offerdable. | Reply
  • ColdGold (02 October 2009 11:40)
    I agree with Avijit (17 July). Lets learn to appreciate the progress our own Hamara Bajaj is making. With the kind of attitude that they are showing to improve, its just a matter of time that they start producing twin cylinders. Even TVS has improved quite a lot. HH is still copy and paste stuff. Their focus on providing affordable biking is truely appreciable. It took two decades for Kawasaki to come out with the current Ninja. I am sure with the efforts they are putting in, they will be no.1 in the next 10 years. Encourage Indian comanies to grow, appreciate the progress they are making step by step and they will make you proud by taking India across the globe. Just like what Tata has done for India. | Reply
  • FastandFurious (01 October 2009 16:55)
    Don't buy this motorcycle because it is cheap. It is full of gimmicks and the 'features' that they offer is pointless. Ask the reviewers about the time ittakes to reach 0-100 kmph. NOT 0-60 ! It will take 14 secs! It is not powerful as they claim. So i suggest all of you to go for a KAWASAKI Ninja 250 which is a true sports bike and it has got 2 cylinders. It will do 0-100 kmph in 6 seconds! | Reply
 roadmelter (06 March 2010 11:41) Reply to FastandFurious
same to u...see the bloody price difference....if u so dont care bout price...then go buy the yamaha r1 !!! | Reply
  • statham (01 October 2009 16:37)
    NINJA 250 is the best choice. | Reply
  • denise (18 September 2009 14:18)
    what is pulsar?? | Reply
  • twitter (18 September 2009 14:17)
    Ameri..you'll look a little funny, but it's not like you'll literally be too tall to fit on the Ninja 250. for someone your size, I would try to get a 500 instead. The GS500 looks more like a 'sportbike' than the EX500, but the EX is the more powerful machine...if you can learn on the MSF's 250cc cruisers, or get some seat time on someone else's 250, a 650 twin (sv650 or ninja650) are about the biggest 'beginner' bikes out there. Both will look better than the 500s.ultimately you have to sit on them and see what suits you best. good luck, and congrats on making a responsible choice for a first bike. | Reply
  • Denise (18 September 2009 14:15)
    yea they are, if your considering a 250r you night as well get a little pocket bike. just go with a kawasaki zx6r they are very good bikes and have a good seating position compared to the other sport bikes(cbr,gsxr,r6/r1) that have you hump backed. as long as you drive responsibly a 600cc will be perfect. my advice, go with a 2009 kawasaki ZX6R | Reply
  • aquos (18 September 2009 14:12)
    Americruiser, Get a 500 instead of a 250, you will want a bigger bike and the 500 is a good size for someone as tall as you. Plus you wont have to get another bike for a while, it will last. | Reply
  • janewest (18 September 2009 14:11)
    Americruiser..You are too tall ! Go to a dealer and sit on bikes until you find one you like and fits, Ninjas are made in 600,750, and 1100 CC's and capable of tremendous speeds and G-forces but also very capable of civilized traffic. Also try the other styles,cruisers and standards and other makes. | Reply
  • americruiser (18 September 2009 14:09)
    I'm in the market for my first bike and i really like the Kawasaki Ninja 250. I am worried about the fact that i am 6 foot 2 and i wonder if that bike is too small for me and i'll be cramped on it. Any suggestions? | Reply
 Jason (17 October 2009 13:55) Reply to americruiser
i am 6 foot 1 inch nd i own a fz16 for the past 10 months no prb at all. when i went to purchase the bike i had only tested herohonda 150bikes nd the karizma and yamaha bikes(r15 nd thefz16) and i liked the fz 16. I didnt ride the fz16 it rode me. They do not give the ninja for test drive right now but after a few months they wont have an option. | Reply
  • ravindra (18 September 2009 13:24)
    How much is cost on road in bangalore Bajaj pulsar 220dtsi, and what about mileage and performacne, pls advise | Reply
  • achiever (16 September 2009 09:45)
    Mr Centaur..who told I am a pulsar fan? I hate all those UGLY 150-220 cc 'sports bikes' that are available here, except FZ and original CBZ. I have seen RD 350 screaming past even though I haven't ridden one. But any way, i cannot deny the fact that it is still a commuter. I know it is powerful, have 2 cylinders and can do 160 kmph. but it is designed to be a commuter after all. Ofcourse it can be used as a racer because it is powerful enough. No motorbike becomes a sports bike just by pasting some stickers. TVS has put 'RTR' on apache. I think it means some 'race track'...i am not sure. But does that make it good enough for racing? Only TVS guys and ignorant people in india will say apache is a 'sports bike'. because most of them haven't seen a real sports bike. Coming to RD 350, i will be really glad to buy a new RD if Yamaha can introduce it again. But i know it is not going to happen. I am waiting for NInja250. | Reply
  • Raptor (16 September 2009 09:24)
    Mr. Patriot, indian 'oxygen' is already polluted with millions of 150-220 cc 'sports bikes'. I am thinking about relocating to Australia. I will wait 2-3 months to see whether ninja will be released. | Reply
  • Centaur (13 September 2009 16:17)
    Dear Achiever,The one thing I definitely find offending about your comment is your notion that the RD350 is/was a commuter. It clearly shows how well informed you are about bikes and the like. I suggest you do a little searching and reading on the net to actually understand the RD350 and how it became the turning point for Yamaha when it was launched on the tracks. I am pretty sure you haven't seen one, riding one is out of the question because only someone who doesn't know the RD can come up with a statement like yours. The RD in the RD350 stands for Race Derived (not Rajdoot, if that's what you thought). There is not even a single indian made bike yet which can take on the RD350. It'll have all you Pulsar or RTR guys pissing in your pants because the bike accellerates like hell and was nicknamed the Yamdoot for the fatal accidents ppl had on this bike (yamaha rajdoot Yam Doot). Being old the bike does have it's cons compared to bikes of today. but I am pretty sure that if you add K | Reply
 nitish (15 December 2009 19:17) Reply to Centaur
hey dude . i hayabusa ..... i have ridden rd350 but its has got no confort and i feel ridding in some old machine... | Reply
  • Rocky  (08 September 2009 16:38)
    Pulsar 220 DTSI is the best bike ever in India | Reply
  • Rocky  (08 September 2009 16:38)
    Pulsar 220 DTSI is the best bike ever in India | Reply
  • Rocky  (08 September 2009 16:38)
    Pulsar 220 DTSI is the best bike ever in India | Reply
 shyam (14 February 2010 19:17) Reply to Rocky
dude can u tel me its mileage????? | Reply
  • Patriot (02 September 2009 12:52)
    My dear RAPTOR, why don't you go and settle in some developed country, may be Australia. Why you are wasting our oxygen.In India this what we have, take it or leave it. | Reply
  • bobby (28 August 2009 01:21)
    i had buyed new pulsar 220cc 4days back.Really it was amazing bike.it looks very nice and its speed is awesome and i dont want to compare with other bikes bcz 220cc having special features. | Reply
  • mike (26 August 2009 15:02)
    I am a motor-bike enthusiast from Germany. Recently I have visited india. I am surprised to see that there are hardly any motor-bikes over 150 cc and all them have single cylinder. I also wonder why all these motor-bikes have similar design? Each and every bikes look remarkably similar! In germany most of the bikes are over 250 cc and there are different categories like sports, offroad , touring, cruiser..etc | Reply
  • shubham (26 August 2009 00:08)
    from my pulsar 180dtsi 2004 i have beaten karizmaa as well as r15 .my bike has got more power bcuz of knn power filter, ngx iridium sparkplugs,silicon cords..... till next launch of bajaj pulsar i wont b changing my bike | Reply
  • ramlakhan (21 August 2009 10:26)
    150/160/180/200/220......phew! Finally they managed to screw the 150 upto 220. It has been more than 3 years they are playing around with 220! I think there is no more space in that engine to dig it further to 250! May be they have to beg Kawasaki for a new engine block! Bajaj better stick on to autos or chetak scooters. | Reply
  • raptor (21 August 2009 10:24)
    Got yourself a "150/160/180/200/220/223" cc "sports bike"..?? Consider yourself "Definitely Male" Eh..?? Think again..Yes, you have heard it right. In developed countries, 250 and lesser cc bikes are considered as beginner's bikes, ones that are fit for learners.Even the Pulsar 220's/Apache 180 and Karizma's will be considered nothing more than commuter bikes in the developed countries. As for the 100-125 cc bikes, they will probably be passed off as "Glorified lawnmower engines" on two wheels. Even the 30 bhp, 250 cc Kawasaki Ninja is being promoted like our own Hero Honda Pleasure Scooter "Why should Boys have all the Fun" ..... Ouch..!! Did that hurt your "Definitely Male" ego..?? Maybe you were under the impression that riding a 150-220 cc cc bike certifies you as a "Hunk" on two wheels "Breaking Newton's Laws of Motions"..??But nevermind, "East is after all East..!!" Our Rich "desi" kids will get a taste of the like's of the 1000 cc Yamaha R1's right here in India. Others can satisfy with 150/160/180/200/220/223" cc "sports bikes"As for "beginner bikers" like me, just give me the Kawasaki Ninja 250R for around 1.75-2.00 Lakhs. I promise I won't mind being labelled as a "Sissy" on two wheels..!! | Reply
  • achiever (20 August 2009 17:04)
    Mr Franger...In India 150-200 cc bikes priced around 65000 RS, mileage with 50-60kmpl, with "advanced features" like 'attractive graphics, colors, front fairings, disk brakes, dtsi, mpfi are considered as sports bikes, right? If so, you can fit a front fairing/disk brake on a splendor or any other bike in that range and can call it as a 'sports bike'!!!!! If you say pulsar 220 is a sports bike, what will you call 'ninja 250' and 'honda hornet 250'?? Single cylinders have their limit, whether it is 150 or 220! That makes not much difference. Yes, Yamaha RD350 is a commuter, but still much much better than the so called 150-220 cc 'sports bikes'!!! | Reply
  • Franger (20 August 2009 08:43)
    to Achieverits not bout catching rd350. its that 220 is a sports bike and rd350 is commuter. By the way u should know what is defination of sport bike. | Reply
  • abhimanyu kapoor  (19 August 2009 20:29)
    dude i own 220 dtsi beated both karizma and r15 in a race and also i was able to click 146km/h on my p220 and of about mileage let me corect every1 i m getting an avg of about 37-42 depends on riding condition | Reply
  • Pulsar (17 August 2009 15:24)
    Arrey yeh toh batao..ki yeh pulsar 220 kitna mileage de raha hai...1 litre petrol se kitna km chal sakta hai? | Reply
  • Veeer (14 August 2009 18:49)
    It's high time in India, the bike makers should stop selling on more CC per money or more Kilograms per rupee. Technogy in the rest of the world is generations ahead of India. Customers and users should start thinking about quality, technology, value, life, maintainace, reliability of products rather talking emotinally. | Reply
  • Nitish (13 August 2009 15:10)
    Dnt compare with R15 ...R15 is a completely cycle . .. .only engine is gd . . .220 is the best value for money ,21 ps ride quality , in just 70k . | Reply
  • hayabusa (13 August 2009 10:44)
    India will never be out of the clutches of 150 and 200 cc single cyinder "Sports bikes". It is a CURSE!! | Reply
  • afaq (11 August 2009 12:18)
    p220 ummmah i like this very much. superb desin good engine. | Reply
  • achiever (06 August 2009 20:55)
    Mr Veeer, don't expect a new RD350 or Ninja 250 here in india. Even in this 21st century, 150-200 cc bikes are still considered as 'PREMIUM' bikes in India!!! More over, It should be priced around 65000 RS, mileage should be 50-60kmpl!That is why all manufacturers are busy with dumping new 150-220 'performance bikes' in to the market every 6 months with --advanced features-- like 'attractive graphics, colors, front fairings, disk brakes, dtsi, mpfi, mpfi....'.........What a pity!! here in india true bike enthusiasts have to satisfy with outdated single 4 stroke engine bikes like this!!! Only ignorant people will claim P220 as a 'sports bike'...and if still doubt, then try to catch an RD350 with this 'performance' bike. | Reply
  • Deepak Kishnani (06 August 2009 20:38)
    p220 i better than karzima | Reply
  • Deepak Patro (04 August 2009 09:29)
    I have booked one before reading this review and I waiting to lay my hands on it.........I did a test ride of course and I just loved it!!! | Reply
  • SD (02 August 2009 22:04)
    IT IS GOOD BUT NOT BETTER THAN KARIZMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | Reply
  • Vikram (28 July 2009 14:46)
    Yes, and my ported Shogan does 0-60 better than both the R15 and the 220 dtsi.. I love 2stroke tech!!!!.. | Reply
  • Sai (21 July 2009 19:29)
    I dont believe that pulsar 220 having 21 horses will give a mileage of 44 kmpl when Pulsar 180 of same technology(both are of same technology DTS I) is giving inbetween 45-50 kmpl . | Reply
  • Veeer (21 July 2009 17:06)
    We want nothing short of 2009 YAMAHA RD 350. Search at Google images: 2009 yamaha rd 350 | Reply
  • Vinay (21 July 2009 15:08)
    R15 is best | Reply
  • Vinay (21 July 2009 15:03)
    R15 is best and about P220 ,just think what you will get in 70 thousand | Reply
  • Sarvan (21 July 2009 05:38)
    Which one of these are best to commute 60KMS per day on highways - R15 or P220?? I dont want to race anybody.. | Reply
  • Raman Shetty (17 July 2009 15:30)
    Well, you guys have to watch what u r sayin... A P220 reminds one of a honda 1000.... UTTER CRAP... That too a moto which needs engine rebuilds in no time... | Reply
  • achiever (17 July 2009 14:27)
    Considering the scenario of Automobile industry in India, for the past 10-20 years there has been a tremendous growth in case of the 4 wheeler industry. And it is continuously growing with the introduction of new models in each segment. THat means, these days there are lot of choices in the small/medium/premium segments. But on the other hand, the 2 wheeler industry seems to be going downwards in terms of develpment. Not a single true performance bike(multi-cylinder) has been introduced after Yamaha RD350 which was released in the 80's. Those people who wants to have a real performance bike have to satisfy with these obsolete single cyl 4 stroke motorbikes!! | Reply
  • Avijit (17 July 2009 12:06)
    Guys after reading most of the comments I feel that first of all we are not comparing apple to apple we are going apple to oranges, R1, R6... can not be compared by P 220 or any other Indian bike first because of cost (boyz u can get 15 pulsars in the cost of one R1 !) secondly look and their engine sizes and thirdly look at the number of years of refinement that has gone in, the first Yamaha motocycle came in the year 1955 and R1 came in 1998 now if you compare the progress bajaj has made i such a short time that too without any external support is very commendable.Now as far as comparing apple to apple is concerned P 220 is definitely most technologically advanced bike on indian roads (made indigenously) the focus if HH is to built ugly slow yet reliable (coz there's hardly any tech!!) bikes for tier B town guys who don't even read such blogs and want to own what they have grown up seeing HH Passion or splendor still looks the the same as they were ten years back (and they also beat the bush about it... remember that baap beta ad) bajaj comes with comes with its new age thinking also TVS is doing a commendable job with RTR and others but HH is truly thumbs down. | Reply
  • Juggernaut (17 July 2009 11:52)
    Guys,I was in a dilemna buying Pulsar 220 or Karizma.I searched every site for the review of the two bikes and I made a decision of buying P200.I got my P220 yest and I'm happy that I have'nt taken a wrong decision. I have showed it to all my friends.Some of them were amazed,some delighted and some said not bad but no one gave a -ve feedback.So,guys go for a P220.You wont get dissappointed. | Reply
  • Pavan (17 July 2009 11:09)
    @ Khushru Irani....dude they can ride and time the speed at sametime on something called 'DYNO'. So its not a rocket science tht how did they figure out the time and speed.@Karan.....do u have any idea wht motogp bikes are like.....r15 can easily crash that barrier 3.47sec 0-60.......my suzuki gsxr600 goes 0-100 in 2.8 sec....and motogp bike less then 2sec.....i bet all the bikes are faster then u r..... | Reply
  • Narayan (15 July 2009 17:16)
    Hi AJD,I've been reading your stuff from the C | Reply
  • Khushru Irani (14 July 2009 18:08)
    Hey Rohit you classy tester. Without going into any other histrionics which you mention, just enlighten us all as to how you timed yuraself doing 0-60 and 0-100! If you really can ride, check the speed and also do the clocks, you ought to be in MotoGP man and not here writing inane stuff to ZigWheels! Lets hear from you man, with proof. I would love to do the things you said you have done. | Reply
  • Rohit Porwal (13 July 2009 23:59)
    hi friends,I m Rohit Porwal. I like Pulsar series bikes bcoz in that bike, u will find everything such as style, looking, performance, speed and many more.Now Bajaj launched Pulsar 220 DTSi.I have pulsar 180 DTSi but I m selling it from when I heard abt 220 DTSi and its mileage and cost........so frnds forget everything and try pulsar 220 once...........If any quaries, then ask me on rohitporwal007@gmail.com | Reply
  • Karan (12 July 2009 23:01)
    Someone here posted r15 0 to 60 in 3.47 sec!!dude did u borrow a motogp engine??ru nuts??dats not possible..get real.. | Reply
  • Robin (12 July 2009 14:35)
    The fastest "Indian" production bike to date is the Rajdoot Yamaha Rd350. Stopped production late 80'sYes built under liscense from Yamaha Motors... I think it still counts. Clever copy "worlds Fastest Indian"Thought cudos to Bajaj R | Reply
  • stingray (10 July 2009 16:24)
    Ahh!!...again they keep on introducing these usless motorcycles!! ------- Where are those Ninja and KTM bikes that they were supposed to bring????? | Reply
  • roops (10 July 2009 16:04)
    I went to test test ride p220 dtsi yesterday. The pick up and handling of the bike are good. But I found that when the bike is stationary and I release the clutch after putting first gear, the bike doesn't leap forward, even if I increase the throttle significantly. Instead it gets into motion slowly and smoothly. Does anyone know whether this has been done intentionally by Bajaj. Somehow I don't feel that adrenaline rush unless the bike leaps or jumps in first gear. | Reply
  • John Vijay (09 July 2009 13:55)
    Hi M Prasanna,I also agree with u b'use I did 19 to 22 hrs contionus drive on my P150 (Old one) and it simply rocs speed and pickup is too g8 for pulser but bajaj needs to improve their quality rest all cool i.e.....AAAGE NIKAL RAHE HAIN HUM from Pulser Mania Add | Reply
  • Sooraj Lal (08 July 2009 15:10)
    I ask one question as to why we should buy an outdated looking bike with an engine of 220 CC which is not as fast as the yamaha 153CC Fazer | Reply
  • kamal (07 July 2009 09:10)
    My recommendation.Go for Pulsar 220. | Reply
  • pulsar fan (07 July 2009 00:08)
    can anybdy tell me what is the milage of new bajaj pulsar 220 2009 model............??????? | Reply
  • Sarvan (06 July 2009 22:41)
    If I have to own a bike and ride it for 4-5 years, which one should I consider.. R15 or P220... Just name them.. coz I have read all the comments. | Reply
  • BAJAJROX (06 July 2009 00:59)
    AAAGE NIKAL RAHE HAIN HUM ...... LOVE U BAJAJ 70 K 220 CC 21BHP HUH !! U CANT ASK FORE MORE R 15 HEHE HAVE U EVER LOOKED TO THIN TYRES | Reply
  • Prashant (04 July 2009 07:53)
    null | Reply
  • Karizmaboy (04 July 2009 07:44)
    Bajaj bikes are far more resilient and power packed than any HH bike.HH doesn't have a presence in bikes of more than 125 CC category.HH can only boast of 100 cc bikes which people try to own for ever.Other HH bikes are not at all in demand if compared to Bajaj bikes.Bajaj rocks and this product is a marvel.No product from any company comes even near to it in Dum.Even in coming 5 years. | Reply
  • baskey (03 July 2009 22:02)
    dear achiever,new 220 dnt have dtsi-fi whch reduces the price upto 15k.b by the wayin 70k wat u r expecting?its more thn enough.in 80k karizma 17bhp here in 70k u r getting 22bhp.n talking abt 250cc.i want to say u cc dnt matter..its ur bhp...have u seen moto gp u can have 35bhp in 100c bikes so dnt b fool by cc..n the more u pay the more quality u wil get... | Reply
  • Scorpio (03 July 2009 18:31)
    I think all of us are taken away by the fact that we want soemthing new; let sthink from angle of a customer who would go to buy such bikefor the first time.HH bikes r pretty relible; indianised more than anybody else ; Gr8 Resale;Consistent Performance;A cool attitude rather than rowdy;Gr8 service facilities;Noiseless engine;ratlle less body;P220 is gr8 bike; but i think am afraid of Qulaity; may be coz i can't afford to drive a Engine-noise type bike;neither do i can afford a new one every 2 years.Though am driving a 180cc for last 17 months, am feeling a pinch when i drive my frn's Karizma...SMOOOTH just KILLIN SMOOTH | Reply
  • Saurabh (03 July 2009 13:09)
    No Doubt Hero Honda is India’s largest Bike manufacturer (in fact World’s largest)And it’s bikes are quite reliable (thanks to Honda for providing its out dated technology).But HH’s all might is restricted to the 100 cc commuting segment which is dedicated to the masses.Give the masses any bike which is time proven (read as obsolete) and they will be happy. And why not that’s what they desire. When its time for upgrade just change the stickers or add an auto start or a disk brake, and add a , Star, Pro, or Super to the name and the masses will be “Super” happy with the so called new bike.Those who are here (or in any such forum) discussing about bikes are serious bikers who love technology, performance and expect more.They want innovation? new product developments? raising of performance bar with fissile products?Just name some bikes provided by Hero Honda which can prove it self on these factors? It fails miserably.It’s true that Bikes produced by truly Indian companies like Bajaj and TVS lack in refinement. But that is because they are at a nascent development stage. Rather look at there zeal to perform better. Look at there ever improving product line, after de merging with there foreign technology collaborator (Kawasaki and Suzuki respectively).Appreciate there courage of introducing new segments, technology and products despite the big risk of failure. If you are serious about biking compare products in performance segment 150cc and above. Hero Honda don’t even come in sniffing distance to Bajaj or TVS?Every biker in India should be grateful to Bajaj for not just opening the performance segment in India by introducing Pulsar but also by constantly increasing the performance bar.Thanks to Hero Honda for providing reliable bikes to Indian Masses so that this country is on move.Thanks to Bajaj for leading India in bike development so that bike enthusiasts of this country don’t have to settle down for LESS | Reply
  • easyrider (03 July 2009 12:20)
    also.. talking abt comparison with r15 which offers 17 bhp..and 220 giving uot 22 bhp is i think cannot be ignored..i hvnt reved 220 but i think it will make a difference ..specially riding uphill terrains..lets face it guys.. we can only hope from bajaj to come up with beefy bikes at affordable costs.. | Reply
  • Team HRH (02 July 2009 15:03)
    I had a p220...It is indeed a great bike. But somehow doesn not give me a thril. After riding the R6, R1, CBR1000...the only bike which can compare overall is the R15. bajaj has come out with an extremely good product...but in my personal view as a pro biker... In simple words if you had to offer either bike to a consumer for free. More often than not they will choose the R15. After riding the R15 the new P220 seems..well a lil on the "Its a nice bike to ride but If youd give me a R15 i would have enjoyed it better" | Reply
  • Rohit (02 July 2009 14:57)
    lol..This is funny. This bike although a great one for the indian market cannot really compare to the R15. I closked an R15 of 0-60 in 3.47 secs...recorded and a 0-100 in 9 secs...On a straight line I don agree that the 220 will beat the R15 but over all..I think the R15 will kick ass on a track and city prvided you have a rider who knows how to handle the R15. | Reply
  • Anuj (02 July 2009 10:15)
    i have to say that this is one scorching performer....ive ridden a 220 dtsfi and was pretty happy with its performance...but increasing it further means the japs really have to start thinking....they are selling good products.. but they are highly overpriced...a zx6r in indonesia costs 2 lakh....n i think 70000 for a 220 is not bad....but 1 for a 150...seriously isnt it a bit too much of a strech???what say japs??? | Reply
  • achiever (01 July 2009 22:40)
    220cc for 70000...just imagine the quality parts that you will get for this price! It will be damn cheap. After all this is the same 'powerful' 150cc engine that was modified to 180, 200, 220. I wonder how long they keep on modifying...220, 250, 300??? If it is so good/powerful bike as they claim, let them sell this bike in the international market. They won't do because no one from any other country would buy a cheap bike like this. What they can do is to cheat ignorant people in India claiming their bikes as 'super-bikes'. So pity!! Hope Honda/Yamaha would bring some real 250 cc twin cylinder bikes soon. | Reply
  • antony (01 July 2009 18:16)
    New unicorn dry weight 139 kg, Suzuki gs150 dry weight is also 139 kg. Unicorn kerb weight 146 kg and Suzuki Gs150 kerb weight 149 kg. So, unless you fill more than 10 liters of petrol, both almost weigh the same, right? Apache RT 160 kerb weight 137 kg. Apache RTR 180 kerb weight 139 kg. Bajaj pulsar 220 kerb weight 152 kg. Now, are these weights correct? Different websites mention different values. | Reply
  • Vpra (30 June 2009 10:09)
    I own a 180 from the first Pulsar family, the so called Classic Pulsar. At that time (2002) it was God-sent because I was on the market to buy my first bike and the HH CBZ was getting a tad too old by that time. And since the time I got my P180, I have done close to 90000kms on it till date. All of it hasn't been trouble free - everything from brake shoes to engine cylinder head has given me pain at some point or the other - but nothing that a little time with the neighbourhood mechanic couldn't fix. I am still using it. It gives me close to 40kmpl in the city ans still allows be to be a rider to reckon with at the traffic light GPs. To me, all this goes to illustrate that though the Pulsar makers need to improve their offerings, they are by no means inferior in quality to start with. | Reply
  • Yashwant (30 June 2009 00:58)
    Both Pulsar 220 and Zigwheels rocks. I have a classic pulsar 150 (2002) which has withstood the very test of time. The bike has never ever let me down over these years. I have ridden her in every way possible be it over cold high mountain passes, real hot Indian desert, at times upto 17 hours a day etc. Trust me guys its all about maintenance. Love your bike like a true lover and she will respond back. Wake up guyz stop critizing Indian technology thinking that evrything that is made abroad is better. Anyway kudos to Honda for still continuing with a 20 year old 100cc engine(now that's what I call techno wizardry).Proud to be a Indian......... | Reply
  • M Prasanna (30 June 2009 00:30)
    I own a 2005 Oct Pulsar 150. I can live with the engine gruffness and the clunky gear box. What I cannot live with are the Brakes!! The front Disc is far too Sharp, while the rear brake feels like kicking a rock. If I try stopping my bike from around 60kmph, using just the rear brake, It either skids or takes ages to halt (I’ve already tried changing the liners | Reply
  • Oreen (29 June 2009 22:37)
    I ride an old Brit marque (mainly for the torque to carry family and luggage up the hills) and am sure the engineering that goes into making a Pulsar is far superior than that of a Royal Enfield. Was looking for a fast bike to do Blr-Kol trips in two days (1000 kms each day), and I think the faster 220 DTSi will provoke Yamaha, Honda and HH to come up with 250 cc versions next. Will test ride this 220 and wait for a Yam Fazer 250... Adil sir, any idea when that will actually be launched? Or is this a good buy for the next five years or so? | Reply
  • shashank (29 June 2009 22:27)
    i hv today brought the all new pulsar 220 . man it rockzzzzzzzzzzz.nice pic-up, nice luks . i can bet that it can beat all the bikes that are currently in the market. n it is only for rupees 75550 only in uttarpradesh | Reply
  • Jai (29 June 2009 16:18)
    I own a Pulsar DTSi and its 3.5 years old now. I don't regret one single bit for buying this bike. Some in this comment thread say that the engine makes scratchy noise when heated up. This has more to do with maintenance. If you have stuck to the prescribed speed limits for the first 1000 or so kms and also do a regular oil change, it will remain smooth. Anyone who rides with me find it difficult to believe that my bike is 3.5 years old. I don't have anything against other brands but this Pulsar brand is the first one which instilled passion and I postponed buying a bike till I had enough money to buy a Pulsar instead of settling for anything less. | Reply
  • Adil Jal Darukhanawala (29 June 2009 11:57)
    This is for very many of you guys who wrote in and thanks for airing their views. I am answering this in the following three comments. | Reply
  • Adil Jal Darukhanawala (29 June 2009 11:57)
    I head ZigWheels.com and would like to state that everyone has a right to air his or her views on every thing we love and do about bikes and cars. If the lot of you who say that we do pro-manufacturer reviews, kindly look at it properly and suggest if we do have any conviction behind backing up our thoughts with action. Unless this is done we would never write the things we do. Many of you lambasted us on the Grande Punto's fuel efficiency and called us crap. Does that make us pro- or anti-consumer? Similar is the fact about the Pulsar 220 DTSi which we stuck our neck out and said what it is capable of. Yes if you had cared to see our testers notes we did mention it being over weight however with a power to weight ratio still being the best in the business we did not dwell on this as much as anyone among the nay sayers would have liked. | Reply
  • Adil Jal Darukhanawala (29 June 2009 11:56)
    contd from above: I myself have been critical about refinement and things but guys start being a lil' bit more practical on things national. Japanese quality was rubbish when they began and it took them almost twenty or more years before they got cracking. I do not want to give this much time to Bajaj in an ever more fiercer world but they have to improve double quick. Can this rationale be outlined and delivered by you all? Also if it were not for the Pulsar many of "us" would still be astride puny bikes and the sporty bike movement might not have got the thrust and impetus it has achieved due to Bajaj Auto's efforts. I am sure that on this front you can't disagree despite whatever beef you might have against the bike and its maker. | Reply
  • Adil Jal Darukhanawala (29 June 2009 11:55)
    Contd from above: I still say that more than at any other time I want you to be pro-yourself as a bike tester and do try out this Pulsar. If after that you have any qualms I am willing to engage further in debate with you. I do not think any other editor would have stated quite openly all what I have so in your own interest I would like you to don your helmet, put on your gloves and give the new Pulsar 220 DTSi all the stick you can give. I will of course be willing to even publish your experience thereafter. This should help you become a pro-ZigWheeler rather than just shooting the breeze. I like all of you bikers who says things, good, bad and indifferent because that is what makes our universe and I desperately want to enlarge and enhance this universe. Do fault me on this if you must but this is it, straight and from the heart and mind. | Reply
  • aramak (29 June 2009 11:18)
    I just love this bike...its soo cool | Reply
  • Sachin (28 June 2009 18:10)
    After Checking all the bikes with price and specification. I have decided to buy this hunk. | Reply
  • Karizmaboy (27 June 2009 13:06)
    Bajaj rocks as an innovative and customer centric company.Pulsars rock as the best possible bikes for common Indians who want the best for their hard earned money.This bike is awesome.I earlier had Karizma.Sold it in 9 months.Thebike is so much expensive that it sucks your pocket like anything.Mileage is crap,spare parts at least three times costlier than Bajaj's.They cry a lot about engine ,and guess what it gives a hell lot of starting problem,chain noise.Rear shockers are too soft.With apillion it bottoms out like anything.I liked nitrox shock absorbers of Pulsars.They are higly suitable for any kind of road.Now bajaj comes with this Pulsar.Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.What will happen to karizma owners."Janlne ki boo aa rahi hain".Koi baat nahi bachho abhi bhi time hain .Come to the daddy.Book the bike which is going to change face of Indian biking yet again.Kudos to bajaj and kudos to Zigwheels for the coverage. | Reply
  • bikingmaniac  (27 June 2009 12:45)
    hardy has put forth the right perception about the bajaj bikes....i ride a karizma and feel the same thing that pulsars and other bajaj products r gud on outlook but give nothing to the consumer except a hefty bill and yrs of dissatisfaction...my brother is using the avenger200 and i feel he is just not liking it at all, he doesnt agrees in front but feels it inside wat can be assumed....to be straight indian bike segment needs to come out with better products not just great on outlook but with efficient engines as well | Reply
  • GM (27 June 2009 12:38)
    Pulsar Rocks !!!!!Bajaj Rocks !!!!!!!And If Ny 1 Having Problem Wid Dis Thn C'mon U Morons !!!!!!! | Reply
  • Sudhindra (27 June 2009 11:30)
    @Manohar, I really love to have one like that, Sound of 4 cylinder 300cc 1.2 lakhs welcome to new India. | Reply
  • Manohar (26 June 2009 22:09)
    Hi, this the land which gave world Nano. Is it not possible to produce a two wheeler with 4 cylinder (I love that sound) 300 to 400cc within 1.2 to 1.5 lakh | Reply
  • Veeer (26 June 2009 22:01)
    Hence ours is a Joint family, we almost have all sorts of vehicles. I ride a180cc Pulsar. Few days back my brother also bought new 180cc pulsar. I just suggest Bajaj to come with good things like Low profile and tubeless tyres, agile handling, some good feel materials like Japanese recent bike, at lower speed you feel shaking engine feel, struggle to stand the vehicle(weight) etc..... | Reply
  • Hosh (26 June 2009 20:50)
    Reply to Arun and Kaustabh Patil: Both of you have a point but I agree with Arun that Zigwheels reviews are more like free publicity for new launches. They are too keen to keep the manufacturing giants happy at the reader's expense. | Reply
  • Azim Shaikh (26 June 2009 19:27)
    A fantastic review by you guys .Great snaps of the bike .Now I think i have finaaly decided which bike to opt for. | Reply
  • pulsarboy (26 June 2009 17:59)
    @hardy u speak lotta sense buddyBAJAJ has to improve on refining its engines rather than great power output and high speeds. how many times do we ride over 100kmph??? we never make use of all those 21 horses.....tho having 'em is an added advantage..BAJAJ 's engines are crude especially pulsar's. But i find XCD's 135cc engine better refined,though no where close to honda.i own a pulsar and have been riding for 2 yearswhen engine gets heated up it sounds harsh...another point i wud like to make is pulsars need to improve on handling part they have softer suspension setup :( though good for city but hinders the high speed cruising....improve on these parts BAJAJ and u have a winner and i am ur first customeruntill then i dont buy BAJAJ | Reply
  • Arun (26 June 2009 15:33)
    Reply to Mr Kaustabh Patil, I dont actually care about apologizing to anybody here. I stand firm to what i stated earlier. I have been riding Pulsars since the first editions were launched in 2002 and i know that even though they are rugged and great they do have flaws. The article here doesnt even mention one tiny flaw which makes me speculate the authenticity about the article as an impartial one. A reviewer is not an employee of the manufacturer and need not be scared about the negative comments he makes in the review. Even superbikes have shortcomings, then why cant this. My statement is a general one and not specific to Pulsars. I am a regular Zigwheels reader and i have noticed that almost all Zigwheel reviews are pro-manufacturer rather than pro-customer. | Reply
  • Vidur  (26 June 2009 09:34)
    your own fault buddy...in other countries u start riding with a 400 cc...in india the top bike is 220 cc...obviusly they will make fun...we cnt compare yet to japs | Reply
  • Manoj Seetharaman (25 June 2009 18:20)
    More and more agree that performance should be affordable without flaws of course. If the new Pulsar 220 is like what I think it is then the other manufacturers have much to think about. If simpler technology can be made to work this effectively, why overcomplicate things? One should only be for technology to a certain limit and pushing the boundaries is Ok to an extent but is that the reason to shun the overwhelming superiority you get when confronted with a supposedly low tech carburettor-equipped two-wheeler? I think this is the major point which many of those who seem to have criticised the new bike seem to have not understood. I rode the bike today morning and am going to buy it. So will that make me biased in what I expressed above? | Reply
  • Js (25 June 2009 17:51)
    Hindustan Jindabad, Hamara Bajaj Jindabad. Make Japs running for their money with their idiotic. Since Indian 220 CC is available at 70K I think Yamaha should stop R15 and Fz16 becasue no body would spend 70 k for 150 CC s | Reply
  • ram (25 June 2009 13:15)
    Typical ADJ | Reply
  • Kaustabh Patil (25 June 2009 10:46)
    This is for Arun, seems you only prefer to sit in selective selective judgement because if you want so much stuff as a completely redesigned set-up you would be surely saddled with a cost penalty. Also you fall in the category of those who haven't seen the bike let alone ridden it so to state the feature is an advertisement is both unbecoming and in very poor taste. Why do I say this? It is because I caught up with the Zigwheels team when they were on the roads out of Pune testing and they got me to ride with them! I suggest you get a test ride and then send in an apology for your thoughts. Thats the least you can do after your uninformed and obviously mischievious words. | Reply
  • Abhilash Garg (25 June 2009 10:32)
    Pulsar 220 is all very good and fine but what about the Ninja twin cylinder 250 which Bajaj was going to bring onto the market? We dont want to get old waiting for it. | Reply
  • Arun (25 June 2009 10:22)
    Seems like a biased review to me. I know it would be a great bike by Indian standards yet it is a bajaj and there ought to be some nitty bitty flaws for sure. I have a top condition P-180 and absolutely adore it, but i admit even that has flaws. I didnt find a single con in the entire review which makes it more like an elaborate advertisement than a review. I exected a lightweight naked streetfighter with shorter wheelbase, a completely new product. | Reply
  • Abhilash (25 June 2009 08:41)
    I already own a Pulsar 220 and man it looks like a beast on the road and nobody can match the sheer power this bike punches in if compared to other bikes in this category in India. I got it for 97000 Grands in Pune a year ago.. This bike is going to rock for sure. But let me tell you guys I am not able to use this bike to full potential on the roads in the City. You have to go on a highway to test the real stuff. | Reply
  • Rupesh Aswal (25 June 2009 08:16)
    I'm riding Pulsar 180 since 2002 and i'm totally satisfied by its performance. Now i wanted a new bike and Pulsar 220i seems the bike i was waiting for. Kudos to Bajaj. But i have one request if bajaj could improve its Service so that it can match up with its bikes. Right now it's service (service stations) in Delhi are pathetic. | Reply
  • Khushru Irani (24 June 2009 22:31)
    So finally we have Bajaj continuing to push push push when others have stayed put in a content manner. The Pulsar 220 DTSi is simply marvellous and Zigwheels coverage does justice to a great Indian achievement. It might seem a step back to many but carburettors are yet not dead but to simply attribute everything to the carburettor is what simply stumps me. I think people have to realise all the other artistry within the engine which has helped the Pulsar put out so much stupendous performance. Read the full test by AJD to understand the why and the how instead of just being blaise about it. Can I now ask for a Pulsar 300 please, say within a year to 18 months? Please, please please do that. | Reply
  • abhishek kali (24 June 2009 18:49)
    great job guys ..... iam leaving for usa and my friends said i cud get better bikes than my 220 dtsfi . but this is one bike that would stand out even if i take it to usa .....bajaj ... u make me proud as an indian !!!!!! | Reply
  • SS (24 June 2009 18:23)
    Just think of quality...... Bajaj is giving 220 engine with so called wuppy performance in just 70k... Bajaj still consisting in flawfull products... I have Bajaj Pulsor 200. A disgusting performance. | Reply
  • Soumik (24 June 2009 15:03)
    The Bike seems very impressive hats off to Rajiv Bajaj and his whole team for working on Pulsar again and again, making it the best Indian bike ever. Its nice to hear that it has the best acceleration with the clocked time of 3.8 secs bettering the Yamaha YZF R15 of 4.2 secs. Also comparing the price and mileage (which Indians are obsessed about) i feel that no bike in that segment stands a chance against The All New Pulsar. Great job i wish the Bajaj team all the best. | Reply
  • gaurav (24 June 2009 14:59)
    yeah...at last...an answer to those die hard RD350 fans..who wud never compromise on anything...but now just check it out mate...under 4 second dash to 0 to 60...under 12 sec. for 100 kmph...and a mind boggling 138.5kmph top whack...with a good control on the beast....what else can u ask for...given that it is an INDIAN bike...once again kudos to bajaj team...keep the good work up guys. | Reply
  • bobby (24 June 2009 13:29)
    AWESOME, Bajaj has done it again. This is the first step in answering yamaha's RD 350 when it comes to TOP SPEED. Great work done and also the pricing is excellent, This might affect the Karizma, FZ16,R15,APACHE FOR SURE...This could be the best tourer and afcourse a preferred one among performance and tourist enthusiast. I WISH bajaj good luck and they need to ensure that they dont stop this bike from production as its the normal norms with bajaj as they put an end to their own bikes within an year... | Reply
  • Navin (24 June 2009 12:10)
    great reviewgood to see a great pulsar after these long years. i'd say that its anytime better than r15 in overall figures.want to see a 220 dtsi and r15 comparofor the first time, my hats off to BAJAJ. | Reply
  • Nagendra S (24 June 2009 11:06)
    A quality review with some quality photographs. Wonderfully brings out the essence of the bike. Would love to see a comparo with the R15 ASAP! | Reply
  • Kaustabh Patil (24 June 2009 10:24)
    So much passion for performance has been brilliantly captured, understood and narrated in your Pulsar coverage. I agree that you have to spread the message of sensible motorcycling at the bottom of the pyramid. In the Pulsar 220 I can see the basis of a motorcycle with strong performance without sacrificing around everyday utility at a very affordable price point. Managing all these together is a tough challenge and I am happy an Indian firm did it and also pleased that someone like Zigwheels said so with authority. Keep up the good work and please do let us have more bikes on the site. | Reply
  • Mano (24 June 2009 09:43)
    what an aggressive move by BAJAJ. I've always been a PULSAR fan for more than 8 years now. I am so proud to see a INDIAN manufacturer keeping the JAPS under pressure, making them work on their strategy for quite sometime now. FI is downgraded only to reduce the cost of bike so that it is reachable by many people than what is now. But still an awesome move to put R15/FZ/RTR/KARIZMA all under pressure. Great work BAJAJ. | Reply
  • Khushru Irani (24 June 2009 09:40)
    WARNING TO ZIGWHEELS!After reading your articles on the Pulsar on your site and today morning in the Pune Mirror, students of my college have gone "INSANE."Next time also please do the same, we all liked it and love going bonkers. | Reply
  • Feroze Amroliwala (23 June 2009 22:31)
    AJD and team kudos to u on a comprehensive coverage of the new Pulsar. That you all put in so much of your might in a product rated so highly is supremely impressive. It is not one of the millions of cut and paste sites which purports to speak a bikers mind. I used to follow Adil in C | Reply
  • pradeep (23 June 2009 18:48)
    220 DTS-i for 70K/-. Thats killer of price, now, bajaj should kill ol' 150, bring down 180 cost to higher 50s to lower 60s!all of a sudden then the "power commuter" 150 segment will shift to 180 capacity!thats "shift of PARADIGM"kudos to rajiv bajaj | Reply
  • Gurdeep (23 June 2009 18:34)
    mindblowing!!!!! I wanna go biking now.....someone puleeze lend me 70,000 grand...i want this bike...!!! Mummeee....Papaaaaa Thoda help Karo na!!!! | Reply
  • Jagshan Singh (23 June 2009 16:10)
    Thank you bajaj for building this awesome, mindblowing, total value for money. I have already booked mine 1 week ago.Hoping to get the 1st one in Ranchi. | Reply
  • subhashish barua (23 June 2009 15:33)
    thats gud 2 hear....but what was the need of launching new bajaj220 without fi ....dont understand...its bit triicky...if they wanted 2 do that...why didn't they launched it in the same 220fi with black spoke and engine....?????? | Reply
  • Vru (23 June 2009 14:44)
    Way to go BAJAJ!!!! this will certainly leave rivals gasping for breath.. the price point and value for money factor will send them scurrying for cover.. no more stupid sticker upgrade jobs like Karizma... Bajaj rocks... | Reply
  • D Sandeep (23 June 2009 14:09)
    Although the Rad test sounds promising,hope bajaj is not goin the Royal enfield way | Reply
  • Kaizad A D (23 June 2009 13:34)
    Thinking out of the box has made the Pulsar steal a march once again over its rivals. I think that if the motorcycling cause has to gather mass acclaim, then affordable performance has to be the operating mantra rather than going fully techno like Yamaha did with its superb but priced-out-of-reach R15. If the new Pulsar is even half as good as we think it is, the others should be rethinking their strategy, especially price coupled to true on-road performance. | Reply
  • Kaizad A D (23 June 2009 13:33)
    How about a price shock Mr S banerjee? And with a bike sorted out finely like this it is the ride and behaviour that matters, whether it be with twin, triple or single shocks. Not meant to belittle you pal but see the overall picture with performance on offer, price and then see whether you want to pay in excess of Rs 1.05 lakhs for similar performance and a shock less at the rear end. Depends whether you would buy a bike at this price with a shock less or is there more than meets the eye here. | Reply
  • Gunrunner (23 June 2009 13:26)
    Free commenting without accountability is the price we pay on the web. Many a time it is good but not when it is idiotic and vengeful like what I have been reading over the last few days from uninformed nuts who have too huge an opinion on any and everything. Karthik here is a great example. Hats off to you man, Kaizad got you KOed well and proper. | Reply
  • Gunrunner (23 June 2009 13:24)
    Free commenting without accountability is the price we pay on the web. Many a time it is good but not when it is idiotic and vengeful like what I have been reading over the last few days from uninformed nuts who have too huge an opinion on any and everything. Karthik here is a great example. Hats off to you man, Kaizad got you KOed well and proper. | Reply
  • Kaizad A D (23 June 2009 12:55)
    This is what we always mean about dumbos like Karthik who speak out of spite and without having seen the bike in real life let alone having ridden it. Both ZigWheels and Bajaj Auto should be there for the next six decades but man Karthik you shot your bolt and are out for the count in six seconds! Why do you do this to yourself? | Reply
  • Karthik (23 June 2009 12:36)
    Bajaj is good at creating hype, I hope zigwheels will live to eat their words for another 6 months or so. | Reply
  • madhumoan (23 June 2009 12:22)
    Wow, what a bike! And what a great way to describe it! ZigWheels rocks and how! Hope this trend of motorcycling continues not just from Bajaj but also from other rivals companies. It is the only way to progress. However what happens to the Kawasaki and KTM motorcycles which Bajaj was supposed to bring? Let us know about them also. | Reply
  • Keshava Pandey (23 June 2009 12:02)
    I like it, I uv it. Gimme me more of this man. When can I buy this in Bhopal? Tell me ZigWheels man, tell me quick otherwise I am losing my sanity! | Reply
Comment on this article
*Mandatory
*Your Comment :
*Your Name :
*Your E-mail :
*Word Verification :
Letters are case-sensitive

Search Reviews
Make
Model



Two Wheelers

 
New Bajaj Pulsar 220 DTSi - Warlord!
Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500: Spunky Thumper
VeeFeR Vanquish
Bajaj Pulsar: First Ride!
MT-01 vs. Suzuki Intruder - A Tale of Two Twins

Top News

 
Unusual looking Cars!
Karun Chandhok to race in F1 2010!
Gifts for your Valentine: The Zigwheels way!!!
Top 5 World's fastest cars
Top SUVs ruling the Indian roads
  Archives>>  

All entries are compulsory
Your Question
Your Name
Your E-mail


Zig Poll
Shop @ Zigwheels.com
Car Audio Mobile Accessories Other Accessories Car Perfumes Car video Accessories Toy Cars Cleaning products
 
Hot on Zigwheels
Volkswagen Beetle
Tata Manza
Toyota Fortuner
Ford Figo
Chevrolet Cruze
New Ford Endeavour
Fiat Linea
Skoda Laura
Fiat Grande Punto
Honda Jazz
Buy Car
Sell Car
Car Insurance
Car News
Join Our Zigwheels Community on: orkut facebook
Subscribe:  Rss Feed
March 2010 Calendars
Nissan 370Z Pular 220DTSi
Nissan 370Z
Pular 220DTSi
  Wallpaper   Wallpaper
  Printable   Printable
Most Viewed cars on Zigwheels
New Car
More: Delhi | Mumbai | Bangalore
Used Car
More: Delhi | Mumbai | Bangalore
Copyright ©2010 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. Advertise with us  |  Careers @ TIL |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Sitemap  |  Contact us