×

Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison

Add Bike to Compare
Hide Common Features
Gixxer

BS6

Rs. 1.12 lakh
EMI - Rs. 3,224
Get Loan starting @9.7%
Apache RTR 160 4V

Disc

Rs. 1.04 lakh
EMI - Rs. 2,996
View April Offers
Ad

125 Duke

BS6

BS6

Rs. 1.38 lakh Know More Get Loan starting @9.7%

Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache 160 4V

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.01 lakh which is Rs. 739 costlier than Suzuki Gixxer priced at Rs. 1.00 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer is 50.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is NA. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine where as TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer is available in 1 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 8 colours. 62% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 4V over Suzuki Gixxer in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more

Gixxer vs Apache RTR 160 4V vs 125 Duke Specs Overview

Specs/Features	Gixxer BS6	Apache RTR 160 4V Disc	125 Duke BS6
Ex-Showroom Price	Rs. 1.12 lakhView On Road Price	Rs. 1.04 lakhView On Road Price	Rs. 1.38 lakhView On Road Price
Rating	4.4 (133 Ratings)	4.1 (965 Ratings)	4.1 (432 Ratings)
Engine Type	4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Air cooled	SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled Engine BS-VI	Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC)	155 cc	159.7 cc	124.7 cc
Power (PS@rpm)	13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm	16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm	14.5 PS @ 9250 rpm
Fuel Type	Petrol	Petrol	Petrol
Transmission Type	Manual	Manual	Manual
Colors
Brakes Front	Disc	Disc	Disc
Brakes Rear	Disc	Disc	Disc
Wheel Size	Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm	Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm	Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)	Cast	Alloy	Alloy
ABS	Single Channel	Single Channel	Single Channel
Starting	Self Start Only	Self Start Only	Self Start Only
Speedometer	Digital	Digital	Digital

Engine

Engine Type	4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Air cooled	SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled Engine BS-VI	Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC
Engine Displacement (CC)	155 cc	159.7 cc	124.7 cc
Power (PS@rpm)	13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm	16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm	14.5 PS @ 9250 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm)	13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm	14.12 Nm @ 7250 rpm	12 Nm @ 8000 rpm
Emission Type	bs6	bs6	bs6
Bore	56 mm	62 mm	58 mm
Stroke	62.9 mm	52.9 mm	47.2 mm
No Of Cylinders	1	1	1
Drive Type	Chain Drive	Chain Drive	Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder	2	4	4
Fuel Type	Petrol	Petrol	Petrol
Ignition	...	Mapped ignition system	...
Compression Ratio	...	10.0:1	...
Transmission Type	Manual	Manual	Manual
No Of Gears	5 Speed	5 Speed	6-Speed

Brakes

Brakes Front	Disc	Disc	Disc
Brakes Rear	Disc	Disc	Disc

Performance

Suspension

Suspension-Front	Telescopic	Telescopic Forks	WP-USD Ø 43 mm
Chassis	...	Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF	Steel Trellis Frame
Suspension-Rear	Swing Arm	Mono Shock	WP-Monoshock

Tyres

Tyre Size	Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17	Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-130/70-17	Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 150/60-R17
Wheel Size	Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm	Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm	Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type	Tubeless	Tubeless	Tubeless
Radial Tyre		...	...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)	Cast	Alloy	Alloy

Dimensions

Dry Weight	...	...	141.4 kg
LengthWidthHeight	20208001035	20357901050	19937891083
Wheelbase(mm)	1335 mm	1357 mm	...
Length	2020 mm	2035 mm	1993 mm
Ground Clearance (mm)	160 mm	180 mm	175 mm
Height	1035 mm	1050 mm	1083 mm
Seat Height	795 mm	800 mm	818 mm
Width	800 mm	790 mm	789 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres)	12 L	12 L	10.5 L
Tail Light	LED	LED	LED
Front Brake Diameter	...	270 mm	300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter	...	200 mm	230 mm

Electricals

Battery Type	Maintenance Free	Maintenance Free	...
Pilot Lamps	...	LED Pilot Lamps	...
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp	LED	LED	LED

Features

ABS	Single Channel	Single Channel	Single Channel
Body Type	Sports Bikes	Sports Naked Bikes, Commuter Bikes	Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting	Self Start Only	Self Start Only	Self Start Only
Seat Type	Split	Split	Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer	Digital	Digital	Digital
Trip Meter	Digital	Digital	Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp			...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator	...
Stepup Seat
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System	Air Cooled	Oil Cooled	Liquid Cooled
Console	Digital	Digital	Digital
Odometer	Digital	Digital	Digital

Warranty

Watch Videos of Gixxer and Apache RTR 160 4V

News Updates on Gixxer and Apache RTR 160 4V

Here's what's different between the BS4 and BS6 Suzuki Gixxer/SF
What else do the BS6 motorcycles get beyond a cleaner motor?

Mar 4, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
Battle Of BS6 Bikes: TVS Apache RTR 160 4V vs Yamaha FZ-S FI V3.0
Here’s how India’s first set of BS6-compliant 160cc nakeds fare on paper

Nov 27, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Suzuki’s Little Gixxers Finally Go Green!
The Gixxer BS6 and Gixxer SF BS6 have been officially launched

Mar 4, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
What’s New About The New TVS Apaches?
Both bikes have been updated to meet BS6 norms, but that’s not all

Nov 27, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels

Similar Bike Comparisons

Apache RTR 160 4V

Rs. 1.01 lakh

vs

Pulsar NS200

Rs. 1.14 lakh

Apache RTR 160 4V vs Pulsar NS200
Gixxer

Rs. 1.00 lakh

vs

Pulsar NS200

Rs. 1.14 lakh

Gixxer vs Pulsar NS200
Apache RTR 160 4V

Rs. 1.01 lakh

vs

Pulsar 220 F

Rs. 1.08 lakh

Apache RTR 160 4V vs Pulsar 220 F
Gixxer

Rs. 1.00 lakh

vs

Pulsar 220 F

Rs. 1.08 lakh

Gixxer vs Pulsar 220 F
Apache RTR 160 4V

Rs. 1.01 lakh

vs

Apache 160

Rs. 94,500

Apache RTR 160 4V vs Apache 160
Gixxer

Rs. 1.00 lakh

vs

Apache 160

Rs. 94,500

Gixxer vs Apache 160
Apache RTR 160 4V

Rs. 1.01 lakh

vs

FZ-S Fi Version 3.0

Rs. 98,680

Apache RTR 160 4V vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0
Gixxer

Rs. 1.00 lakh

vs

FZ-S Fi Version 3.0

Rs. 98,680

Gixxer vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0
Apache RTR 160 4V

Rs. 1.01 lakh

vs

Apache 180

Rs. 1.01 lakh

Apache RTR 160 4V vs Apache 180

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best bike compared with Honda Hornet, TVS Apache RTR 160 4v, Yamaha FZ S 3.0 in mileage, pickup, comfort, price, service and spares?

If we compare Fi version of all bike then i think pickup of TVS Apache will be more, according to mileage 1st will be Hornet then Yamaha and then Apache but the difference will be only 4-5 kms.If we come to comfort i own Apache and i didnt find any problem with comfort, and for pricing you should contact dealers in the city.
I have carb. version of apache its good that your bike is giving such a mileage.
Bro U have the older version of apache i think The rtr 160 4v gets almost 59-60 on the highways and minimum 48 in city i think u will change ur opinion

View All Answers

Q. Which is the best Apache 160 4v or pulsar ns 160?

The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hnad, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features. However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers

View All Answers

Q. Which variant of RTR 160 4v is better fi or the carburetor?

The claimed mileage of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is 60kmpl. Although, our experts has tested its carburetted on road and found that it gives class leading figures of 50.9kmpl in the city and 56.1kmpl on the highway. Also, mileage can be differ and depends on one's riding style and how it is maintained.Though we’re yet to test its FI variant, there is a minor difference in the refinement levels of the FI and the carburetted bikes though. The FI is just that little bit smoother, and also offers up a slightly sharper throttle response. And when you’re in the very upper band of the rev range, the FI doesn’t feel out of steam. The carburetted bike on the other hand feels a little gruntier, though it is a little gruff as well. But in many ways the carbed bike feels more enjoyable to ride, thanks to its slightly punchier power delivery in the mid range. In case of long rides, it might bother you to take a break due to its aggressive riding position.
I love carburettor variant because we can tune the carburettor.. and low maintanence and if there's a problem in fuel injection you can't modify you have to buy a new fi system which is costly... there is no such a big difference in mileage is rarely 2-4 km and i don't think it's a big deal
See obviously fi varient is better..but if you ride on long routes then i will suggest you to opt for the carburettor varient because if in any case your bike brokes down then the carburettor engine can be repaired by anyone... on the other hand the fi engine is a bit more complex to repair.

View All Answers

Q. Which bike is better Apache RTR 200 4V or Apache RTR 160 4V

Obviously RTR 200 4V is better bike among these two because of reasons given below1.Styling :- RTR 160 4V is Downscaled Version of RTR 200 so looks are subjective this statement is not applicable here And if you will look in pictures RTR 160 4V will look equally good but in real life the difference is apparent in RTR 200 it looks wider and musculer and has splitted seats and gold coloured front forks which stands it out from the commuter crowd.2.Performance :- here also RTR 160 4V can't even stand a chance and there is no argument that RTR 200 4V is sportier bike and it is faster by a big margin whether it is acceleration or top speed RTR 200 will always ho faster and will give you more adrenaline rush.3.Mileage :- mileage is slightly better on RTR 160 4V but it is not a big difference, only 5 kmpl will be lesser on RTR 200 4V in normal riding condition RTR 200 4V gives a mileage of 37-40 and RTR 160 4V gives a mileage of 42-45 but if you are a hardcore rider and if you will ride your bike mostly on highways and if you will ride your bike on speeds like 100 and 110 then RTR 200 4V will give you more mileage because as a 160 cc bike it will be the top end for RTR 160 4V and as my friend told and as i have saw it on youtube milage goes down to 32-35 kmpl and for RTR 200 that speeds are normal because it is 200 cc bike and it is easier for a 200 cc engine to maintain 100 kmph constant speed and it will give normal mileage under these conditions4.handling :- Here also RTR 200 4V's Handling is better than RTR 160 4V's handling because RTR 160 4V has Wide Handlebar and RTR 200 4V has Clip on handlebar and clip on handlebars are known for their sporty handling so if you like cornering so much than RTR 200 is the perfect bike as it also offers you super stickey and grippy Pirelli tyres which are absent on RTR 160 4V5.Comfort :- here both bikes are eqaully good and you might think that RTR 200 4V has clipon handlebars so it will more aggressive and less comfortable but it is not the case because it's handlebars are raised Clip-Ons and they doesn't affect comfort and RTR 160 4V's Wide handlebars are also similar to other bikes in it's segment so both of them give you same comfort.6.Refinement and Vibrations :- if you are thinking that RTR 200 4V and RTR 160 4V are similiar to RTR 160 and RTR 180 than it is not the case both bikes are so much refined and they have very less vibrations which are present only in top end and in top end also vibes are very negligible.7.Features :- RTR 160 4V is very feature rich bike but it can't stand a chance against it's father RTR 200 4v which has more features than RTR 160 4V like Gear position indicator and better looking instrument cluster because of white backlight and it comes with slipper clutch which and it is first bike to have Slipper Clutch in it's segment and it is very rare in higher segments also and it is a very useful feature it is far better than normal clutch and both bikes have ABS on board but the ome on RTR 200 4V is Dual channel ABS so It is Functional on both the tyres front and real while RTR 160 have single channel ABS and it is only operational only on front tyre so if you will press rear brake suddenly then rear wheel will end up in locking and slipping.8.Verdict :- if you are on tight budget than RTR 160 4V makes sence but if budget is not concern and you can spend about 20 thousands more you can end up buying a better bike.Thanks
It depends on your budget nd mileage...Both the bikes are best sellers in their segments you will get slightly better mileage in 160 Fi abs than rtr 200 fi nd you have to pay slightly lesser for 160cc...Rtr 200 has an edge over 160 in terms of ART-Slipper clutch...both the bikes are almost similar you can't get wrong with any of the two so choose according to your need nd mileage.
Both the bikes are good and value for the money bikes in their segment. If you require more power then you can go for TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 and if you are on a budget and require a frugal fun to ride bike then you can go for TVS Apache RTR 160 4V. Read More: - 5 Best Value-For-Money Motorcycles Upto 400cc: https://www.zigwheels.com/news-features/news/5-best-valueformoney-motorcycles-upto-400cc/32213

View All Answers

View More Questions

Top Commuters Comparisons

Top Cruisers Comparisons

Top Sports Comparisons

Top Scooters Comparisons