Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160
Last Updated: August 31, 2026
TVS Apache RTR 160 price starts at Rs. 1.04 Lakh, which is Rs. 37,695 cheaper than the base variant of Suzuki Gixxer, priced at Rs. 1.41 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Gixxer offers a claimed 38 kmpl, while the Apache RTR 160 delivers 47 kmpl. On the performance front, the Gixxer uses a 155cc engine producing 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm and the Apache RTR 160 a 159.7cc engine producing 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm. If you're deciding between the Gixxer and Apache RTR 160, the Apache RTR 160 is the better pick for affordability and mileage.
...Read More
Gixxer vs Apache RTR 160 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Suzuki Gixxer | TVS Apache RTR 160 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.41 Lakh | Rs. 1.04 Lakh |
| Mileage | 38 kmpl | 47 kmpl |
| Engine | 155 cc | 159.7 cc |
| Max power | 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm | 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 141 Kg | 137 Kg |
-
Suzuki Gixxer
Rs. 1.41 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,070 View August OffersTVS Apache RTR 160
Rs. 1.04 Lakh EMI - Rs. 2,984 View August Offers
Gixxer vs Apache RTR 160 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Suzuki Gixxer STD | TVS Apache RTR 160 RM Drum Black Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
1 review |
222 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Suzuki | TVS |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.41 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.04 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | 4-Cycle, 1- Cylinder, Air Cooled | SI, 4 Stroke, Air Cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection |
| Max Power | 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm | 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 4,070
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
Rs. 2,984
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,066 Gixxer Insurance | Rs. 10,432 Apache RTR 160 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- The motorcycle looks very muscular , Has brilliant handling characteristics
- Ride quality is harsh, Headlight is not bright enough
Is Suzuki Gixxer Better Than TVS Apache RTR 160?
100% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer over TVS Apache RTR 160 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 342 users have also rated Suzuki Gixxer and TVS Apache RTR 160 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Suzuki Gixxer is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and performance in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 160 is better on the grounds of comfort, maintenance and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Apache RTR 160 | Gixxer |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Performance | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Comfort | 3.0 | 4.2 |
| Maintenance | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Features | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Latest News on Suzuki Gixxer and TVS Apache RTR 160
Recently Asked User Questions
- The Suzuki Gixxer 250 offers a more powerful 249cc engine compared to the Honda Hornet 2.0’s 184cc, providing better performance and top speed. However, the Hornet 2.0 is more agile in city traffic, with a lighter and more compact design.
Suzuki Gixxer Vs TVS Apache RTR 160 FAQs
Images of TVS Apache RTR 160 and Suzuki Gixxer
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160

