KTM RC 390 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Comparison
KTM RC 390 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350
KTM RC 390 Price starts at Rs. 2.44 lakh which is Rs. 98,019 costlier than Royal Enfield Classic 350 priced at Rs. 1.46 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM RC 390 is 25 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Royal Enfield Classic 350 is 40.8 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 390 is powered by 373.2 cc engine where as Royal Enfield Classic 350 is powered by 346 cc engine. KTM RC 390 is available in 2 different colours while Royal Enfield Classic 350 comes with 6 colours. 63% users have chosen KTM RC 390 over Royal Enfield Classic 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM RC 390 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
RC 390 vs Classic 350 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | RC 390 BS6 | Classic 350 BS6 Stealth Black |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 2.48 lakh | Rs. 1.82 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Twinspark |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 346 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm | 20.07 PS @ 5250 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-482.6 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Twinspark |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 346 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm | 20.07 PS @ 5250 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 36 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs6 |
| Bore | 89 mm | 70 mm |
| Stroke | 60 mm | 90 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | Transistorised Coil Ignition (TCI) |
| Compression Ratio | 14.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | WP-Open Cartridge USD Ø 43 mm | Telescopic forks |
| Chassis | Steel Trellis Frame | Single Downtube, Using Engine As Stressed Member |
| Suspension-Rear | WP-Monoshock | Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-90/90-19, Rear :-110/90-18 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-482.6 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tube |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | ... | 20 psi |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 166.8 kg | ... |
| Length*Width*Height | 2145*760*830 | 2160*790*1090 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
| Length | 2145 mm | 2160 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 178.5 mm | 135 mm |
| Height | 830 mm | 1090 mm |
| Seat Height | 820 mm | ... |
| Width | 760 mm | 790 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 9.5 L | 13.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 320 mm | 280 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 240 mm |
Electricals
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ... | |
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Cruiser Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| Handle Type | Clip On | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Analogue |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | |
| Distance to Empty | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ... | |
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ... | |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Analogue |
| Odometer | Digital | Analogue |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is the best among RC 390, Classic 350 and Himalayan?
- In what terms are you asking?All three are bikes meant for totally different purpose.RC390 is best when racing is a factor to consider. It is not a city bike and certainly does not feel comfortable when riding in traffic conditions. Its best at its job and that is track performance. Classic 350, is best suited to easy riders and is mostly preferred by riders who tend to go for tour aswell. Its old school design is appealing and has its own charm. It certainly cannot be compared with any other motorcycle regarding the performance figures. If you love the classic, then you buy the classic. So it is as easy it can be to decide. If you want to look for performance check other charts.Himalayan is an off road bike, it doesn't mean it can't be ridden on roads! But it is not designed for city riding. So if you are mostly going to ride in the city and off-road is not your kind. Then do not buy this. But if your city roads gives you an off-road experience, then you might consider this bike as the suspension does a great duty.
- Mileage and Daily Commuting: RE Classic 350 (Noise from the head is irritating and not that expected level of satisfaction)Offroad Sports and Commuting: RE Himalayan (A good commuter and adventure driving)Track Racing and Highway Rides: KTM RC 390 (Not preferred for city rides)
- Classic 350 is what I suggest better.. as it cost is less than all.and also good power although there is vibration but it is good.or u can buy Himalayan it's also good. But I will not suggest RC as good for long tours
Q. Which one is better between Royal Enfield Classic 350 and Thunderbird 350?
- The RE Classic is a retro-street bike whereas the Thunderbird is a cruiser machine. The Classic 350 is apt for budget-conscious riders who want a distinct old-school pizzaz in their motorcycle. However, if you crave for more torque and are not worried about the relatively higher fuel bills than the 350, go for the Classic 500 instead. It also offers the advantage of fuel injection, which helps in providing crisper throttle response and easier cold-starts. On the other hand, the Thunderbird family is arguably one of the most feature-laden motorcycles from the British brand. Both the 350cc and 500cc variants feature dual trip meters with average speed readout, digital fuel gauge, a generous 20-litre fuel tank, projector headlamp with LED DRL, and relaxed ergonomics. Though the Thunderbird 350 feels short on power on the highways, it is still a good choice for enthusiasts who love to go on long rides. Click on the link to compare these two siblings: https://bit.ly/2jK42ji Ultimately, it boils down to your requirements. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- If you think for touring purpose definitely Thunderbird 350 or you are daily commuter and covered more than 100km.Classic have their strong existence in market due to old school look. Truly appreciate the Royal Enfield to build classic but if you ride more than 100km on highway, you must have strong spinal system, as after riding you feel back pain due to double spring system on seat as well as bike. when you ride more than at the speed of 80km/hrs, seat continue vibrates and may impact your nervous system. Thunderbird 350 less appearance in the market but truly riding experience much higher than the other Royal Enfield bike. You can enjoy your weekend riding as well as daily commute with this beast, less vibration than classic 350, seating posture also very good that means you never tiered, if you ride more than 100km.Comparison to engine: both having same engine bit change in rpm settings for pickup.
- RE Classic 350. In every terms,it feels much better. It feels royal and feels like yes you arent riding some day to day commuters. Thunderbird 350 is just a styled 350 and don't even have a after sale handsome evaluation. RE Classic though quite retro gets everything you want. And ofcourse, Modification can make it better than RE Thunderbird 350.
Q. Which is better KTM RC 390 or KTM 390 Duke
- There is no doubt in this tht KTM is highly reputed company but I want to share my experience, I have ktm rc390 and have done hardly 29000 km on it. You can check me service records, all services are before time.. but my bike has started leaving black smoke. It has just done 29000km and leaving black smoke. It's engine oil level decrease drastically.I have give my bike in ktm service station, total cost is above 50000 Rs. That too it l take month to get repaired. Once u have purchased this bike, there is no good support from KTM. Every one is just looting money from you. You can just imagine the quality of engine which starts burning engine oil just after 29000 km.
- My bike is ktm rc 390 ...Why i choosed this model because first of all i think rc is looking more musculr than duke ...if we look at its specifications both rc and duke having the same except its handling and ride postureBefore rc i had r15/pulsar 220 both are more or less same on its riding posture and handlingIf we look at duke its a staright sitting naked bike And i test drived once at that time i felt its little hard to ride in traffic means to do very tricky to make a fast manoeuvre rest in highways it gives a good rodong posture with no back pain or shoulder painThen also why i choose rc my mainly because of its handling and look
- Both are powerful performance bikes...they are made to do drift or race..drift bi Duke 390 with supetmoto mode in which you can unlock rear abs for drifting lowers..can be used for short commute not touring..Rc 390 is a proper race track beast for leaning in the track..ultimate midrange..handling...which one is better? buy according to your needs...but Duke does all what rc does and more with supetmoto mode...
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
