Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer 2019 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer 2019
Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at Rs. 1.00 lakh which is Rs. 25,011 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar 150 priced at Rs. 75,200. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar 150 is 65 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Gixxer is 50.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 150 is powered by 149.5 cc engine where as Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 150 is available in 7 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer comes with 1 colours. 59% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar 150 over Suzuki 2019 Gixxer in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar 150 vs 2019 Gixxer Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar 150 Twin Disc BS6 | 2019 Gixxer STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 98,835 | Rs. 1.00 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC,2valve, Air cooled, DTS-i, FI | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14 PS @ 8500 rpm | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 5.53s |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC,2valve, Air cooled, DTS-i, FI | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14 PS @ 8500 rpm | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 13.26 Nm @ 6500 rpm | 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 |
| Bore | ... | 56 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 62.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 5.53s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 20.07 s @ 99.98 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 17.06 m,m |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 31.47 mm |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 50.58 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 49.7 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 20.10s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 17.06 m,m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Conventional fork | Telescopic |
| Suspension-Rear | Twin shock absorber, gas filled with Canister | Swing Arm, Mono Suspension |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-80/100-R17, Rear :-100/90-R17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | ... | 29 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2055*765*1060 | 2020*800*1035 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1320 mm | 1335 mm |
| Length | 2055 mm | 2020 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1060 mm | 1035 mm |
| Seat Height | 785 mm | 795 mm |
| Width | 765 mm | 800 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 15 L | 12 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Full DC | Maintenance Free |
| Pilot Lamps | Twin Pilot Lamps | ... |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Commuter Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ... | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | ... | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which bike is best in Honda CB Unicorn 150 or 150 Pulsar?
- Despite being present in the market for more than 15 years, the Bajaj Pulsar 150 still remains the king of the 150cc segment. The Bajaj Pulsar 150 still remains a great option if you’re looking for an entry-level 150cc motorcycle. The motor offers likeable performance with a hint of brashness which made the Pulsar brand so popular among the youth which still remains a well-rounded motorcycle. On the other hand, the Honda Unicorn might not possess the same visual pizzazz of the Pulsar 150, but what it does offer is a bulletproof engine which is frugal as well. The Unicorn 150 is a better bet if you spend most of your time riding in city traffic and the engine refinement offered is still the benchmark in the segment.Do take the test ride for both the bikes in order to pick the best matching your needs and requirements. Moreover to check the detailed comparison follow the link given below: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/bajaj-pulsar-150-vs-honda-cb-unicorn
- Unicorn 150 is way better than Pulsar , due to its riding position , you will get back pain after a few years, you can sit straight and ride , which is good for a City with traffic jams , and if you go long distance like more than 150 km ,then also you will ride it very comfortably ,and talking about suspension , it has good suspension technology.In India there is famous saying "yatha naam tatha gun" it suits this bike .
- For a daily cummute and refined motorcycle you need cb unicorn is best as pulsar is not refined is parts make a lot if sound but is if you want a fast bike which has the best power delivery you should go for pulsar 150
Q. Which is better among Pulsar 150 and Honda Hornet 160R?
- First of all in 150 cc segment Bajaj offers 3 pulsar models. 1-Classic 150. 2-Pulsar 150 standard. 3-pulsar 150 Dual Disc. Classic and standard offers 55kmpl mileage, where as dual disc offers 50kmpl mileage due to more weight, dual disc, wide tyre. So if you want more mileage then go for classic or standard according personal favourite. If you want style and mileage you can manage then go for dual disc. It is very good handler, best in city as well as highway ride. Next if you are considering hornet 160R then it will not provide as much mileage as pulsar. It will provide around 40kmpl mileage. It has much fat tyre than pulsar. Weight is also more. So it will not as good as in city. You ca say it will provide more grip on high way while breaking. But comparing both pulsar is more ajile, you can ride smoothly in city traffic. The feeling of Flawless Riding experience you can only feel in pulsar. So better go for Pulsar.
- As per my experience and the design of vehicle pulsar 150 is best for safe ride Because the scratch guard is extended and footrest of pillion will not let for direct contact of the body during an accident. And there is good road grip. Better wear riding gears
- Go for Hornett b coz pulsar has too much Maintance cost compare to hornet after 4 year i use only 30k km although my metre chain break 2k exp of it and jumper also gone and other exp also average 13k is exp after 3 and half year of use.
Q. Which model of bajaj pulsar 150 is best in its all model. STD, NEON, CLASSIC, DUAL DISC. please suggest me
ASAP.
- Neon and classic are the same because neon comes in 3 colors now, neon silver (CLASSIC), neon red and neon lemon. Now, STD and neon have a difference in stickering, as neon doesn't come with stickers and STD comes with stickers. Pulsar 150 Dual disc is pulsar 180(dimension wise), with 150cc engine. It has fatter rear tires as well as rear discs. Also, the front disc is larger. But it misses out on kick starter.I have mentioned all the facts. Measure your pros and cons and decide.
- Neon is the base model of the pulsar 150 in terms of pricing. It has a simple look as that of the classic but no graphics available and as a result the price is much low. Std and dual disc and classic are more or less same. They have color options with graphic designs. Dual disc have engine cowl and engine guard.
- Dual diac is best as per feature wise. Neon is cheapest version. Engine specification is same in all variants. You can buy any according to your budget and feature preferences. Also consider Yamaha's FZs-fi v3.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
