Bajaj Dominar 400 vs Jawa Perak Comparison
Bajaj Dominar 400 vs Jawa Perak
Jawa Perak Price starts at Rs. 1.96 lakh which is Rs. 5,498 costlier than Bajaj Dominar 400 priced at Rs. 1.90 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Dominar 400 is 25.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Jawa Perak is NA. In technical specifications, Bajaj Dominar 400 is powered by 373.3 cc engine where as Jawa Perak is powered by 334 cc engine. Bajaj Dominar 400 is available in 1 different colours while Jawa Perak comes with 1 colours. 64% users have chosen Jawa Motorcycles Perak over Bajaj Dominar 400 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Dominar 400 vs Jawa Perak on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Dominar 400 vs Perak Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Dominar 400 STD | Perak STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.90 lakh | Rs. 1.96 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, DOHC, 4 Valve, Liquid-cooled, Triple Spark, FI | Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC BS-VI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 334 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 40 PS @ 8650 rpm | 30 PS |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.0s | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, DOHC, 4 Valve, Liquid-cooled, Triple Spark, FI | Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC BS-VI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 334 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 40 PS @ 8650 rpm | 30 PS |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 35 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 31 Nm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 89 mm | 81 mm |
| Stroke | 60 mm | 65 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 11:01 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.0s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | 15.53 sec @ 134.48 kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 17.38m | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 31.36m | ... |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 49.42m | ... |
| Mileage (City) | 25.59 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 32.29 kmpl | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 7.1s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 17.38m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | USD Telescopic Forks | Telescopic Hydraulic Fork |
| Chassis | Beam type perimeter frame | Double cradle Tubular Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Multi-step adjustable Mono shock with Nitrox | Mono Shock Absorber, 7 Step Adjustable |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-100/90-18 Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tube |
| Radial Tyre | ... | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2156*836*1112 | ... |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1453 mm | 1485 mm |
| Length | 2156 mm | ... |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | ... |
| Height | 1112 mm | ... |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 750 mm |
| Width | 836 mm | ... |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 14 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 320 mm | 280 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 240 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | VRLA | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | LED Pilot Lamps | ... |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Cruiser Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | ... |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ... | |
| Clock | ... | |
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ... | |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Analogue and Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is better Dominar 400 or RE Himalayan?
- 2019 Dominar 400 ofcourse because RE only focus on heavy engines and they provide only air cooled engines and they don't make bikes with lots of features in this era.Buy a dominar and live like you are in 2020 in real .
- I would go with dominor 400... you will get a lot of additional features, speed,power and look compared to Himalayan. Though it is not suitable for off-roadings.
- For a better tank range you can go with himalayan but for better maintenance cost and good torque you can go with dominar
Q. Which one will be the better option out of Dominar 400 and KTM 390 in terms of overall performance, design and comfort? Please help.
- If you are looking for a bike with better acceleration, ruthless performance, better features and more sporty trail, you can go for the KTM 390. If the comfort is your main preference with a decent amount of power and great suspension setup for long tours you may opt Dominar 400. The KTM has been provided with riding modes with TFT display being one of the major features. The Dominar 400 gets features which totally justify the worth the bike as well.However, we would suggest you take a test ride of both the bikes regarding the comfort, features and ride quality.Click here for the dealership: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- Hi,Ktm is any better as the bike is light weight and has a better build quality but the bike has a hard seat and engine get heated more than dominar. So if you have a bigger budget go with ktm however dominar is heavy but best value for money bike with just 3 PS less power than ktm
- KTM is lighter. performance and handling is better. it has better display. But Dominar is value for money. reliable. maintenance will not hit
Q. KTM DUKE 250 VS BAJAJ DOMINAR 400, Which is best and reliable long lasting machine. Only for long ride and touring purposes.
- Dominar is having a very nice machine which doesn't heat much from the Duke 250 and it will even help you for long ride because the engine doesn't gets heated too much and it is little bit much comfort from the Duke 250 in matter of seat
- Then you opt for Bajaj 2019 Dominar 400. This bike is segmented as cruising bike and KTM Duke 250 is non-abs and segmented in sporting bike. You have your clear cut answer
- Different beast for a different purpose!! go with your heart dude!!
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
