Indiatimes  |  
    ZigWheels
 
Home Buy & Sell News & Features Gallery Special Coverage Interact
Reviews

<< previous   1 2    next >>   
Untitled Document
 
 

Skoda Laura Vs. Chevrolet Cruze: Stars and Czechs

Photography: Kunal Khadse     15 Jan 2010

Test Drive Chevrolet Cruze
Laura-&-Cruze_1

The entry of the Chevy's new Cruze has just hotted up the mid-size segment even further. But does this teeth-baring entrant have what it takes to upset the segment favourite, the Skoda Laura? Abhishek Nigam puts them to the task

Being at the top is great. You're way above the rest, you are popular and it mostly implies you are successful. No matter how delightful it may seem from down below, being at the top is always a struggle with the competition always finding ways to push you down. In the 10-15 lakh segment it's the Skoda Laura which has been reigning supreme for quite some time demolishing one challenger after another. This time however the Laura is up against its toughest competitor yet. A competitor who packs a mean punch yet wears a suave bow tie while at it. What we're talking about is the all new Chevrolet Cruze. The J300 as it is internally known as was introduced in 2008 and internationally served as a replacement to the Chevrolet Cobalt and the Daewoo Lacetti. Since the Cruze was developed by a global design and engineering team it definitely feels much more American unlike its rebadged Korean predecessor the Optra.

Laura-&-Cruze-2

And it looks the part too. The Cruze has a chiseled, sophisticated exterior that gives nothing away to more established brands. The unusual double decker front grille treatment is particularly refreshingly. The swept back head lamps the muscular swage line gives it an extremely aggressive demeanor. The Laura was recently given a face lift wherein it received stylish new headlights, a slightly revised grille and other minute changes. Still placed next to the Cruze, the Laura looks pretty bland. And more so in white where the Laura looked like Vanilla next to Blueberry.

Buy i20

On the inside as well the Cruze is as radical as its exteriors. The centre console is a mix of grey, silver and glossy black surfaces. The speedo console looks neat with overlapping ovals and the chrome rings around them. The seats are pretty comfortable and offer good support in all the right areas. At the rear however, the Cruze takes a back seat to the Laura. Not only does it have less legroom but headroom also suffers thanks to the sloping silhouette. A first in this segment the car also features Keyless start stop entry which is a welcome addition to the already loaded Cruze. Get inside the Laura and the first thing one notices is how much more airy and spacious the car feels. The ergonomics are spot on and so is the quality of materials, a hallmark of the Skoda brand. Getting to the rear, 3 adults can be seated abreast comfortably with more than ample legroom. On the hot summer days the Laura also has the distinct advantage of having a separate blower for the rear passengers. The Laura however is devoid of any kind of steering controls which is shocking for a car in this segment

Laura-&-Cruze-3

The other shocker was provided by the Cruze. Floor the throttle and there is considerable lag till about 1800 rpm and then all hell breaks loose. The Cruze just rockets forward riding a huge wave of torque. The 100 km/h sprint is covered in just 11.6 seconds. Keeping the pedal nailed saw us through 200 km/h with us running out of road at 207 km/h. The performance is thanks to the brilliant motor lying under that chiseled hood.

The 1991 cc VCDi unit coupled with the variable geometry turbo pumps out a 150 PS and a stump pulling 327 Nm of torque. The Laura on the other hand has to contend with the dated Pumpe Duse engine which pumps out a relatively mediocre 105 PS and 250 Nm of torque. Performance as expected is not a patch on the Cruze. Pedal to the metal makes the Laura get to a 100 km/h in 13.26 seconds while she tops out at 181 km/h. Around town though it's the Laura that's easier to drive in bumper to bumper traffic due to the relatively less turbo lag. In the Cruze you're either out of the power band and once the turbo spools up, almost on the bumper of the car in front. The power delivery is anything but linear with the turbo kicking in wildly. So one really needs to modulate that throttle well. Gear shift quality is spot on in the Laura while the Cruze tends to get notchy at times. Braking is brilliant on both cars with both of them employing discs all around. The bite on the Cruz however felt slightly better. Dropping the anchors from a 100 km/h the Cruze managed to come to a halt in 46.77 metres taking just 4.11 seconds. The Laura did the same in 45.82 metres and 3.98 seconds.

 
 

<< previous   1 2    next >>   

Launches of 2010


User's Comments
  • Gagan Singh (31 August 2010 14:28)
    Hi i need to buy a car for my sister, but i am confused whether it would be a cruze or a petrol laura TSI, used only in the weekends. | Reply
  • aman (23 August 2010 13:07)
    skoda laura is the best car its give you feel like bmw aur audi i ssssges u abot gm moter s cruze give u feel like tata desile eng | Reply
  • sunny (20 August 2010 01:43)
    listen mannnnnnnnnn there is no other diesel car better than laura as its look ...space...seats r comfortable ..good sensor and musicsystem.very good average about 18per ltr its dicky is so big ki one can put a bullet inside .....the interiors and exteriors r very good and bold looking...as now company is giving 4 yrs of warranty so i think so its a better chance to own a car that looks more beautiful than a bmw as its is similar to bmw | Reply
  • nitin (02 August 2010 00:20)
    need to buy a car for around 13-14 lacs. test drove the cruze and laura 2.0. the cruze certainly has the punch when it comes to pick up and features are comparable to the skoda superb. since the engine of superb and laura is the same (2 ltr crdi) the cruze seemed to fit the bill. but then i drove the laura. as mentioned in the blog the space is much more...and it also gives you a solid feel. i already have an aveo and the problems that i have with the after sales service, are discouraging me to go in for the chevy brand. GM is very aggressive with the cruze but the service centre has a different story to tell...!! on the other hand, i have heard horror stories about skoda's expensive maintenance. if i loose the key, it will take 2 months to get it with a price tag of Rs.7000..!!! expensive. the same kind of code changing key is with the cruze as well that takes around 4-5 days to deliver and costs much less. all in all after comparing and test driving several times both the cars that are new launches, i either take a risk with shoddy service, bad resale with the little known cruze or i take the plunge and risk spending loads to maintain the laura, guess one should also look at (thoguh underpowered) toyota altis diesel. | Reply
 ram (21 August 2010 12:28) Reply to nitin
you nan take skoda laura | Reply
  • S S Kumar (22 July 2010 19:59)
    Looks like an article sponsored by GM to promote the Cruz. Skoda is an outstanding car built to perform and last for ever. The only negative against it is the high repair bill in the unlikely event of a repair.The bill can almost swallow you and your family !! Otherwise an excellent car with an extremely decent mileage. | Reply
  • jaiprakash (11 July 2010 21:19)
    cruze is a dumb child who acknowledges the acceletor tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo late laura goes like a rocket as soon as you press the paddle .i prefer laura over cruze inspite of the fact that cruze has more features | Reply
 dd singh (15 August 2010 11:37) Reply to jaiprakash
laura cant stand against cruze...laura looser so better go wid u all cruze.. | Reply
  • devinder (01 July 2010 23:11)
    i am owner new skoda laura laura is good car i am feel inside the car so good driving feeling is so good i am a test in cruze no no no its not compe...... whith laura | Reply
  • edwin (20 June 2010 15:08)
    all cars are useless but chevy is good | Reply
  • whitetiger (24 April 2010 14:09)
    go fr skoda gm suckkksssss nd so does the cruzzeeeeeeeeeeeeee bettr buy a maruti car thn to buy gm.....lol | Reply
 dd singh (15 August 2010 11:41) Reply to whitetiger
buy nano thn to buy skoda. | Reply
 karki (27 August 2010 14:31) Reply to dd singh
do u know about skoda cars?lf not shut up ur mouths.i think ur a nano fan.learn to drive a cycle then commend about cars. | Reply
 vid subra (07 May 2010 09:47) Reply to whitetiger
@whitetiger: i hv a cruzeeee and it rocks....skoda looks like a 70 yr old granny...and it cannot race with a cruze coz the skoda engine sucks...needs viagra | Reply
 StarBoy (03 June 2010 11:03) Reply to vid subra
@vid subra I really doubt your driving capabilities. Bring on 1.8 TSI or 2.0 Turbo disel of Skoda, I really dont even need to compare. This GM cruze might look better 'coz now GM has only left with option. I am really waiting for SKODA VRS, which ban easily make Cruze fainting in my rear view mirrors.. | Reply
 navin (04 June 2010 11:54) Reply to StarBoy
commonnnnn, u need to have even comparision right (it as to be apple to apple n not apple to mango), cruze has 148 bhp engine compared to 110 bhp of laura.cruze is a rocket......
  • GPRastogi (22 April 2010 14:35)
    I am an owner of SKoda Laura L | Reply
  • tushar (07 April 2010 11:38)
    skoda is very costly comman man cant afford the expencess | Reply
  • tushar (07 April 2010 11:38)
    skoda is very costly comman man cant afford the expencess | Reply
  • skodars (27 March 2010 02:55)
    same here cruz is far better in terms of upkeeping the coast as far as i also owe one laura the cost of keeping the car is far too expensive and above all the skoda dealers are big cheats | Reply
  • Ram (20 March 2010 19:34)
    DO NOT BUY LAURA...THE MAINTENANCE COST IS TOO HIGH. A.C. IS DEFECTIVE COMPRESSOR GOES JUST AFTER THE WARRANTY PERIOD COSTING RS85000/-...THE OTHER PARTS GOES VERY OFTEN..BUY ONLY IF YOU HAVE SPARE MONEY TO GIVE SCODA. | Reply
  • N (13 March 2010 15:00)
    i think credit should be given where its due. cruze is a good looking car regardless of its roots and about time we stop the childish legacy talk about koreans not being at par. | Reply
 ashu (22 March 2010 12:41) Reply to N
so right, hyundai is korean, so is lg so is samsung and these are major companies in india | Reply
  • carlsberg (13 March 2010 14:54)
    we need a cruze vs laura 1.8petrol shootout .. leaving the fuel type aside. I am torn between the two as to which one to buy. All i care for is power, performance and handling. | Reply
  • Milorad (10 March 2010 15:06)
    It would be fair to compare the 150HP Cruze with the 140HP Octavia/Laura 2.0 TDI (less than 10s to 100 km/h). Before buying mine, I went to see the Cruze - it seems much less practical for day-to-day use. As for the dependability, it has yet to prove its worth, while the Skoda has been acclaimed the world over (check independent reviews). Cheers from Italy. | Reply
 sameer prabhu (10 March 2010 22:27) Reply to Milorad
Can some one guide me.I want to buy a car with budget not exceeding 15 lacs.I have 4 options.Cruze (14.99 lacs),Laura petro (15.05)l,Toyota Altis petrol(14.8 llacs) | Reply
 sameer prabhu (14 March 2010 11:08) Reply to sameer prabhu
Which one of these 4 cars is best with regards to suspension.My wife is a severe patient of slip disk Can some one guide me.I want to buy a car with budget not exceeding 15 lacs.I have 4 options.Cruze (14.99 lacs),Laura petro (15.05)l,Toyota Altis petrol(14.8 llacs) | Reply
 ashu (22 March 2010 12:48) Reply to sameer prabhu
thats a serious issue sameer, why dont you take a test drive of both the laura and the cruze with your wife sitting inside , go to a rough road patch and see in which car she feels more comfortable. Personally I would recommed the cruze.
  • Kartik (26 February 2010 00:51)
    Beware OF GM products!!!! R they Poisonous? Y to be worried abt the US market if GM is a profit making company in INDIA... | Reply
  • Indrajeet (17 February 2010 00:38)
    laura is anyway better than cruze in every respect be it power or comforts.. | Reply
 Edwin (22 February 2010 10:05) Reply to Indrajeet
Have you lost ur senses,cruze is damn powerful than the mean laura.The only aspect where laura scores over cruze is interior space... | Reply
  • Truth is Truth (12 February 2010 03:18)
    Trust me General Motors Vehicles they are crap donot buy them Chevrolet, Vauxhall Pontiac, SAAB, buick, Cadillac, hummer, Saturn, all these are looking for customers in their own home country america whereas VW's (Skoda) area good in relaibility and have resale values... | Reply
  • BJ (09 February 2010 18:43)
    DO NOT BUY LAURA...THE MAINTENANCE COST IS TOO HIGH. A.C. IS DEFECTIVE COMPRESSOR GOES JUST AFTER THE WARRANTY PERIOD COSTING RS85000/-...THE OTHER PARTS GOES VERY OFTEN..BUY ONLY IF YOU HAVE SPARE MONEY TO GIVE SCODA. | Reply
 S Manohar (20 March 2010 01:57) Reply to BJ
Do what I did. Buy a Maruti Estillo! | Reply
  • Manik Khanna (05 February 2010 15:16)
    Hi Guys,Hmm Preety Neat article by the author. I like his way of saving the Cruze a lot of embrassement by comparing it with the lowest Possible engine given in the Laura. He is saying the Laura has to contend with just a dated Pump Duse engine. My dear friend have you ever sat behind the wheel of the Laura 2.0. Compare that to a Cruze and then you'll feel the difference between a meakly powered Cruze and a Monster of a Laura, providing you with a massive torque of 320NM at just 1750 RPMs while the Cruze is able to attain its Maximum torque after 2600 RPM. And being a Pump Duse Engine the Laura CO2 emissions are also Low.You are saying that you were able to reach 100 KMPH mark in just 11.6 seconds, well the Laura does that in under 8 seconds.. whose fast now baby. Have the privelage of owning both the Cruze LTZ and Laura 2.0. And i put them both to test head on. Started a 50 KM race from the Toll Counter on Delhi Gurgaon Jaipur Expreesway. The Laura shot to a blazing start that i reached 180 KMPH in no time and my Friend who was driving the Cruze was still at 140 KMPH. In the entire race i clocked 205 Kmph as the top speed riving along with the traffic (cause a every day drive is not out on an empty track or on a empty road), while the Cruze could only hit 176 KMPH as its top Speed due to lack of power and the turbo lag to get in and out of the traffic easily. So Clearly it shows which Car has more power. And when it comes to the equipment in both the cars i agree Cruze is neatly fitted with instrument clusters, but as and when you step in an Laura L | Reply
 ati (03 April 2010 00:50) Reply to Manik Khanna
well having cars dosent means everything. what do u want to prove cheat. you r wrong. i have jetta laura and cruze at as well and i have done what u say and cruze is a real winnner | Reply
  • Anil (02 February 2010 23:41)
    Chevrolet Cruze is being replaced by Cobalt. Cruze might have 1.4 or 1.8 litre turbo charged 4 cylinder. Chevrolet Cobalt was not too impressive as it had few problems. In 05 | Reply
 anuj (03 February 2010 14:48) Reply to Anil
Its funny, where you read it. Cobalt is old version and is being replaced by Cruze. You can google or search on edmunds, which says "Engineering for the CRUZE, J300 project has been headquartered in Germany at GM Europe's headquarters in Rüsselsheim, Germany. All design work has been led by the international team in Incheon, South Korea, at the former Daewoo facility, with designers Dave Lyon and Taewan Kim presiding (love the BMW 3 Series-style taillights also found on the recently sexed-up Citroën C5). " | Reply
 Anil (02 February 2010 23:43) Reply to Anil
Message was truncated- complete messageChevrolet Cruze is being replaced by Cobalt. Cruze might have 1.4 or 1.8 litre turbo charged 4 cylinder. Chevrolet Cobalt was not too impressive as it had few problems. In 05 | Reply
  • sunil (01 February 2010 03:39)
    the cruze however you look at it is a daewoo- a last ditch effort by GM and so is the Captiva, whereas the Laura is a european car. the cruze if you look at it from different angles looks like a civic from the back, a copy of the new lancer on the sides, and the front like a ford focus except for the grill. everywhere else in the world these cars retail for 8-9 lakhs, come to india and have to pay double for these. | Reply
 anuj (01 February 2010 15:26) Reply to sunil
The price of all (expensive) cars are double in India, compared to USA; In India you get the top of the line cars. WIth regards to comparing Cruze to others, you are totally wrong, Di you really see/check Cruze or just saw in pics? Just by saying European car doesnot mean its great. End of the day it all depends on what you really want. BTW, looks wise Cruze stands out (atleast for another year or so, until some other sexy model comes out). | Reply
  • giri k (28 January 2010 17:03)
    Brand craze leads to poor objectivity! Hondas and Skodas have inflated prices and theerfore the uneducated but neo- rich are using them with the fervour of a Jaguar buyer. | Reply
  • Giri K (28 January 2010 16:59)
    Our Laura is the cheap taxi car in Europe where normal taxis are brand new E class Mercs. Looks like brand craze does blind the uneducated rich who look up to Skoda and Honda cars like gods. | Reply
 Hans Meyer (28 January 2010 20:46) Reply to Giri K
Price for a taxi-ride is always the same over here, no matter if taxi is a Merc or a Skoda. But one cannot take a Chevy-taxi here- because it does not exist. Cheys building-quality is too lousy to make it a taxi. greetings from germany :) | Reply
  • Sandeep (27 January 2010 10:19)
    Comparing diesel Cars in 10-15 lacs range (Optra Magnum, Skoda Octavia, Chevy Cruze | Reply
  • Safi (27 January 2010 00:27)
    The new Laura lost its spark when compared to its older versions. Chevy Cruze looks much better when compared the new Laura. | Reply
 Rick Wagoner (28 January 2010 03:48) Reply to Safi
Beware of GM products. Nobody buys them here in US. | Reply
 JP (28 January 2010 06:56) Reply to Rick Wagoner
..."nobody buys them here in US".You are stupid. It was the biggest car manufacturer till 2008 and they're coming back strong. | Reply
 AB (06 February 2010 02:28) Reply to JP
JP -- Calling someone stupid does not make you smarter...
 Star Boy (03 June 2010 11:37) Reply to JP
they are coming up stongly... baaabhaaaaaaa .... lol and you are MD know them so well
  • Jay (26 January 2010 23:58)
    I am fortunate enough to own both - yes the skoda is a little roomier but I ABSOLUTELY positively have to say that the Chevy is really a great ride. Much better! Lots of fun, very cool, and feels more quality-driven. | Reply
  • sanjeev (25 January 2010 18:02)
    skoda already feeling the heat. dropped price of laura by 1.15 l. | Reply
 ravi (05 February 2010 14:49) Reply to sanjeev
skoda has droped in petrol version not in diesel its the same price tag | Reply
  • Aayush Agarwal (25 January 2010 07:20)
    well giving u my hand on these beautiful pieces of machinery, i would have a few grams heavier on the cruze. I have a Laura and an Optra.. guess what.. there is no other car on indian roads as comfortable as optra in the 10 lakh segment.. be in skoda octavia, corolla or any other vehicle.. so that makes me guess that the cruze will be a mln time atleast if not more better than optra.. laura has features comparable to a mercedes C-class.. while Cruze has that comparable to a BMW.. so the choice is yours.. dont forget.. a cruze parked at a road side will fetch 100 on goers out of 101.. while laura.. may be 10-11 of 101.. | Reply
  • Sundar (22 January 2010 07:20)
    Also hey abt looks... the cruZe looks Chineese. Like a chinese version of SX4 (front view). However An internationalpanel of judges including architects, critics and artists awarded the “Most Beautiful Automobile of the Year 2004”title to the Skoda Laura in Milan. | Reply
 bose (06 February 2010 04:35) Reply to Sundar
boss Skoda Laura is an Indian launch.. in other parts of the world it is know as the octavia.. so much for your milan comment | Reply
 JP (27 January 2010 04:52) Reply to Sundar
Sundar you're askew. Chevy neither looks Japanese nor mundane. It's a hot car - I have driven the chevy and it totally beats the pants off the boring to drive skoda | Reply
 Santhosh (22 January 2010 10:33) Reply to Sundar
2004.... !!!! where are you??.. We are at 2010... not 2004. | Reply
 Manik Khanna (05 February 2010 14:58) Reply to Santhosh
JP... my dear which Car of skoda hav u driven... hav been fortunate enough to drive the new Laura 2.0 AT L | Reply
 Kal (15 March 2010 06:43) Reply to Manik Khanna
when i took a test drive of d Cruz i didnt find tat punch u gt in drivng laura.... Laura gt powr.. n it has better interiros than cruz.. bt Cruz gt a sexy SUN ROFF...
  • Sundar (22 January 2010 07:06)
    meet an accident, and there's more chance you'll survive in a skoda than in a Cruze or even an Accord - Real comment from a friend who walked out with a few scratches after an accident in the Laura @abt 160KPH - bad one mind you (The previous version)Hey also a comparision between the petrol versions will be nice. :) | Reply
 Rohit (24 January 2010 16:33) Reply to Sundar
im happy for ur friend but technically Chevy is stronger than any other vehicle including mini trucks ... thats their thing! | Reply
  • Ashish chhabra (21 January 2010 10:22)
    The new launch of cruze must be attracting few buyers,,but,the interior quality is much behind what laura has,,also,the drive of laura is awesome as compared to cruze,as cruze feels light while driving and skoda is very heavy and stable on high speeds and very firm on road,,even stable at 140 kmph,it is like mini BMW as it has a pure european touch in driving as well as its exterior part,also,the legroom is v.good as compared to cruze,so,its laura which is ahead in many terms with cruze. | Reply
 Anuj (21 January 2010 13:14) Reply to Ashish chhabra
Guess you have not seen the interior really in LTZ. The twin cockpit console, sunroof, great 6CD audio, controls on the steering, leather interiors are all far more attractive. Also, the ride quality is great (its much better on highways and zooms like a flight). Many times comparing apples to oranges is not fair though. But Cruze for sure looks modern and trendy than the old fashioned Skoda/Laura. BTW, I drove both cars, did TD of Cruze 3 times before buying and folks around me in office are more excited than me for its trnedy looks and features. (End of the day it is all in the mind on deciding what to buy) | Reply
 Rohan (21 January 2010 10:31) Reply to Ashish chhabra
true Ashish sometimes the reviews seem to be biased now they favour a car a few days down they put it down. The skodas are for people of kind who love and pride enfields and bullets not for people who look for mileage | Reply
 giriK (28 January 2010 17:07) Reply to Rohan
Well said - actually Skodas | Reply
  • chester (20 January 2010 14:23)
    The new cruze is like a breath of fresh air from the chevy factory...it shud help boost their sales in india...nevr really been a gr8 fan of the skodas.. | Reply
  • bharath (20 January 2010 06:50)
    tulla | Reply
  • Anil (20 January 2010 00:01)
    Skoda Laura Vs. Chevrolet Cruze ??? No one in the west even buy these cars. chevy has numerous problems and outdated. Skoda never heard of it in US. If you want RELIABLE car buy Honda Accord. Cheap, reliable low maintenance and SAFE car. I have it for 12 years I kow it | Reply
 roamn (28 January 2010 10:28) Reply to Anil
why r u pple comparing urself with americans . americans do that.......america does not have that ......... evry brand have itz own market and segmentation . u are talking like u r carrying 15 lac all time in ur pocket. | Reply
 Sid (26 January 2010 00:05) Reply to Anil
or a toyota camry... | Reply
 Shoab (25 January 2010 17:00) Reply to Anil
I fully agree with you. I also drive Accord for the last 5 yrs and without any maintenance, just changing engine oil/filter. No car in that particular segment can beat Honda Accord. | Reply
 Ricky (28 January 2010 15:35) Reply to Shoab
I agree with you Shoab, I have driven Honda Accord for the past 3 Years when I was in the middle east, it is a great Car,I have driven Buick too a great car and Toyota Carola not so good, at present I have Fiat-Palio 1.6, 2002 model alsoa great car but cannot be matched with Honda Accord belongs to a different league and I found Mercedes Sel-280 above the rest. | Reply
 Rahul (20 January 2010 15:56) Reply to Anil
Skoda is VW in US | Reply
 Ashwin (26 January 2010 23:38) Reply to Rahul
OMG Rahul..what an insane remark..dude get ur basics right! | Reply
  • Nanjil (19 January 2010 21:44)
    Cruze is a American Junk from a bankrupt auto maker. | Reply
 Anita (19 January 2010 23:04) Reply to Nanjil
We are not talking about Company, talk for the machine. you will found the skoda a real junk and waste of money for 107 BHP. | Reply
 NIshant (25 January 2010 17:16) Reply to Anita
scoda rocks babe! | Reply
 dinesh singh (25 January 2010 02:43) Reply to Anita
Miss Anita , if you do not know about car , please do not speak | Reply
  • Abhishek Chauhan (19 January 2010 10:33)
    Abhishek, thanks for that spilt comparision between the two.. I am a staunch lover of the Skoda brand. I test drove the Chevu Cruze sometime back and found most of what u said to be true. The space in the rear does seem less but it is reasonable unless the driver is over 6 ft. I would definitely recommend the Chevy Cruze as it in most segments beats its oponents convincingly. Abhishek, would you care to do a similar review between the Octavia and Civic. | Reply
 rohan (21 January 2010 10:27) Reply to Abhishek Chauhan
Hi do You own a skoda? check out the 2 litre petrol octavia no stuff comes close. well when on mileage look for maruti 800 or alto | Reply
 Kartik (26 February 2010 00:56) Reply to rohan
Hi Rohan.Mileage is a very important factor in 2days time n in the future to conserve our environment.. So y would u need to buy a 800 or a alto to have mileage. Will u not be happy if ur 15 lakh rupee car gives u a good fuel economy that too in diesel!! like a 3- lakh rupee maruti 800 ??BTW 2.0 ltr petrol octavia is way back into history for its pathetic emission norms..Power n economy makes the Indian buyers choice. | Reply
  • pulkit tiwari (18 January 2010 22:09)
    but cars are compatible...but due to 150 bhp of cruze....it looks much beatable...... | Reply
  • AJ (18 January 2010 19:41)
    150BHP Vs a mere 107BHP is hardly a comparison! The Laura isnt in the same class. It is better compared with teh Optra.They need to get he pricing right though. | Reply
Comment on this article
*Mandatory
*Your Comment :
*Your Name :
*Your E-mail :
*Word Verification :
Letters are case-sensitive

Search Reviews
Make
Model



Two Wheelers

 
Vespa all set to come back to India
First Ride: The new Bajaj Auto Discover 150 DTSi
Royal Enfield's Tour of the Rann of Kutch - Good 'ol salt-of-the-earth adventure...
Navroze Contractor's Australia Ride
The Heritage High

Top News

 
India's Gill kings Rally Queensland
Ford to export Figo to 50 new markets
Hyundai Santa Fe to be launched in October
Nissan to take booking of Leaf Reuters
A-Star AT vs. i10 Magna 1.2 Kappa AT
  Archives>>  

All entries are compulsory
Your Question
Your Name
Your E-mail


Zig Poll
Shop @ Zigwheels.com
Car Audio Mobile Accessories Other Accessories Car Perfumes Car video Accessories Toy Cars Cleaning products
Hot on Zigwheels
Tips for safe driving
Tips for safe driving and more...
Safety is one of the most essential factors...
 Tackling the Monsoon
 Tips for Long drive
 Child Attention!
 Winter Driving tips
More...
ENVIROMENTAL CORNER
ENVIROMENTAL CORNER
The world is facing a severe fuel crisis...
 Ways to save fuel
 Why buy Hybrids car
 Ways to Drive Green
More...
 
 
MAINTENANCE CORNER
MAINTENANCE CORNER SPECIAL PACKAGE
A vehicle that is maintained well will...
 Tips to run your car
 Engine Care Tips
 Tips for the Service Center
 Interior Detailing
More...
GADGETS CORNER
GADGETS CORNER
From gizmos to apparel with an automotive...
 Apparel
 Accessories
 Other Stuff
More...
 
 
Join Our Zigwheels Community on: orkut facebook
August 2010 Calendars
Land Rovers Kawasaki ZX-10R
Land Rovers
Kawasaki ZX-10R
  Wallpaper   Wallpaper
  Printable   Printable
Most Viewed new cars on Zigwheels
New Car
More: Delhi | Mumbai | Bangalore
Subscribe:  Rss Feed
Most Viewed used cars on Zigwheels
Used Car
More: Delhi | Mumbai | Bangalore
Copyright ©2010 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. Advertise with us  |  Careers @ TIL |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Sitemap  |  Contact us