×

BMW G 310 R vs Kawasaki Ninja 300 Comparison

BMW G 310 R vs Kawasaki Ninja 300

BMW G 310 R Price starts at Rs. 2.99 lakh which is Rs. 1,000 costlier than Kawasaki Ninja 300 priced at Rs. 2.98 lakh. The claimed mileage for the BMW G 310 R is 31.9 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Kawasaki Ninja 300 is 32.1 kmpl. In technical specifications, BMW G 310 R is powered by 313 cc engine where as Kawasaki Ninja 300 is powered by 296 cc engine. BMW G 310 R is available in 1 different colours while Kawasaki Ninja 300 comes with 1 colours. 63% users have chosen Kawasaki Ninja 300 over BMW G 310 R in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare BMW G 310 R vs Kawasaki Ninja 300 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

G 310 R vs Ninja 300 Specs Overview

Specs/Features G 310 R ABSNinja 300 ABS KRT Edition
Price Rs. 2.99 lakh Rs. 2.98 lakh
Engine Type Single-Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC Engine Parallel Twin, Liquid-cooled, 8-Valves, DOHC Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 313 cc 296 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 34 PS @ 9500 rpm 39 PS @ 11000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.07s 3.36s
Wheel Size Front :-17dia inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Cast Aluminium Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type Single-Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC Engine Parallel Twin, Liquid-cooled, 8-Valves, DOHC Engine
Engine Displacement (CC) 313 cc 296 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 34 PS @ 9500 rpm 39 PS @ 11000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm 27 Nm @ 10000 rpm
Emission Type bs4 bs4
Bore 80 mm 62 mm
Stroke 62.1 mm 49 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 2
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition ... Digital
Compression Ratio 10.9:1 10.6:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.07s 3.36s
Quarter Mile 15.58 s @ 134.99 kmph 15.45 s @ 141.18 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph) 18.78m 17.83m
Braking (80-0 kmph) 32.45m 32.14m
Braking (100-0 kmph) 50.61m 51.32m
Mileage (City) 31.86 kmpl 32.1 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 37 kmpl 31.10 kmpl
Mileage (Overall) 35 kmpl 30 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 7.47s 7.17s
Braking 60-0 km/h 18.78m 17.83m
Suspension-Front Upside down fork 37 mm Telescopic Fork
Chassis Tubular spaceframe Tube Diamond, Steel
Suspension-Rear Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load adjustable Bottom-Link Uni-Trak with gas-charged shock and 5-way adjustable pre-load
Tyre Size Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 150/60-R17 Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-140/70-R17
Wheel Size Front :-17dia inch, Rear :-17 inch Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Cast Aluminium Alloy
Length*Width*Height 2005*820*1080 2015*715*1110
Wheelbase(mm) 1374 mm 1405 mm
Length 2005 mm 2015 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) ... 135 mm
Height 1080 mm 1110 mm
Seat Height 785 mm 785 mm
Width 820 mm 715 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 11 L 17 L
Total Weight 345 kg ...
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 290 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 240 mm 220 mm
Battery Type MF ...
LED tail lights ...
Turn Signal Lamp Bulb LED
Alternator 308 W ...
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Body Type Sports Naked Bikes Sports Bikes
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Single Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Tachometer Digital Analogue
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp ...
Clock ... Digital
Low Battery Indicator ...
Stepup Seat ...
Passenger Footrest ...
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Console Digital Analogue and Digital
Odometer Digital Digital

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better kawasaki ninja300 or BMW G310R - G 310 R - G 310 R?
  • The BMW’s unique reverse-inclined engine helps in better mass centralisation, improved inflow and outflow of air which in turn keeps the engine cool at all times. The engine though is quite vibey, which can be felt through the handlebar, footpegs and body panels. Expect the BMW G 310 R to be quite similar to the RR 310 in terms of engine character; however, the German counterpart would be a lot more refined. The G 310 R is said to be most happy in the mid-range and kicks in slightly sooner compared to the RR 310. The refinement on the Japanese twin-cylinder is second to none. Moreover, it is assisted with a slipper clutch which makes for easy downshifts and prevents wheel hopping, something that the BMW misses out on. The power is concentrated towards the top of the rev band, with serious performance kicking in post 9,000 rpm. Heat dissipation is another big plus as it's directed to the bottom of the bike and away from the rider, keeping the engine and the rider cool. All things considered, the Kawasaki Ninja priced at Rs 2.98 lakh offers a tad more in terms of value for money. However, if you're looking for high levels of fit and finish and the BMW badge, the G 310 R priced at Rs 2.99 lakh (both ex-showroom) makes for a good proposition. Both the manufacturers offer 3 years of warranty and unlimited kilometres. Read more: BMW G310 R And G310 GS First Ride Review - https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/bmw-g310-r-and-g310-gs-first-ride-review/31732/ 2017 Kawasaki Ninja 300 Road Test Review - https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/2017-kawasaki-ninja-300-road-test-review/29390/ We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
  • Both are almost same as they both come under same 300cc segment... Kawasaki is a bit ahead in terms of performance... seating posture is upright in Bmw and pillion comfort is also good where as in Kawasaki seating posture is forward may not be suitable for long rides and pillion comfort is not good...if you are a speed lover then go for Kawasaki...engine is more refined in Kawasaki than bmw...
  • Kawasaki, being a Japanese machine, is definitely the best buy against BMW 310R. Also, the part and maintenance would be easy for Kawasaki.
View All Answers
Q. Which is better Ninja 300 or Duke 390?
  • The KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. The 390 Duke is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja 300 hasn't garnered a lot of fame in India, owing to its price tag. But with the new pricing, the future looks a lot more promising for the Ninja 300. It does come across as a very potent track tool with not so sharp ergonomics as the KTM. Making it a more approachable machine for riders to use it for their daily stints as well. Plus at Rs 58,000 you get an extra cylinder over the Duke 390 and a reliable Japanese brand name. Power though is still not at par with the KTM. Nonetheless, a twin-cylinder at this price is pretty tempting.
  • Both are good in 2 different areas. Ninja is more of a sports tourer with very refined engine( Japanese bikes) Has higher top speed. Has good road presence. But lacks many of the techs found in duke 390.Duke 390 has less refined engine . But offers lots of tech like tft display which displays lots of information.
  • Ninja is much better than ktm as Kawasaki has many years experience in building refined and powerful engines and after price drop it is most affordable if we compare expense with its performance because in 300 cc segment it is the most powerful sports bike.
View All Answers
Q. Which one is best duke 390 or G 310 R - G 310 R - G 310 R?
  • Both are indeed good options to go for. The KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. It is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. The Duke has a shorter wheelbase of 1357mm, handy while manoeuvring through tight spaces. The KTM still remains the better option if you have a power hungry soul & gets a seat height of 830mm. The BMW G 310 R on the other hand has a low seat height of 785mm, which will be a boon for shorter riders. In terms of looks, the G310R is exactly what you would expect a BMW designed bike to look like. Ultimately it boils down to your needs and wants.
  • Both are indeed good options to go for. The KTM 390 Duke has always come across as a value for money product and the new variant takes the VFM quotient a notch up as it looks a lot more irresistible now. It gets an LED headlight unit and colour display that we like a lot and also handles beautifully with its aptly tuned suspension setup. Also, while it may not be as quick as the earlier 390, it certainly is a lot more refined. It is a wild beast and is meant for a lot more experienced riders and thrill seekers. The Duke has a shorter wheelbase of 1357mm, handy while manoeuvring through tight spaces. The KTM still remains the better option if you have a power hungry soul & gets a seat height of 830mm. The BMW G 310 R on the other hand has a low seat height of 785mm, which will be a boon for shorter riders. In terms of looks, the G310R is exactly what you would expect a BMW designed bike to look like. Ultimately it boils down to your needs and wants.
  • All the BMW owners are complaining about breakdowns and mechanical failures, Hope BMW takes care of this. The KTM on the other hand is lesser known for such issues.Plus the service network for KTM is very accessible compared to BMW.I not even going to discuss the performance and tech on both the bikes, coz it's not even a comparison.
View All Answers
View More Questions