Bajaj Dominar 400 vs BMW G 310 R Comparison
-
Dominar 400
Rs. 1.92 lakhEMI - Rs. 5,524Get Loan starting @9.7%
G 310 R
Bajaj Dominar 400 vs BMW G 310 R
BMW G 310 R Price starts at Rs. 2.99 lakh which is Rs. 1.09 lakh costlier than Bajaj Dominar 400 priced at Rs. 1.90 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Dominar 400 is 25.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for BMW G 310 R is 31.9 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Dominar 400 is powered by 373.3 cc engine where as BMW G 310 R is powered by 313 cc engine. Bajaj Dominar 400 is available in 1 different colours while BMW G 310 R comes with 1 colours. 73% users have chosen Bajaj Dominar 400 over BMW G 310 R in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Dominar 400 vs BMW G 310 R on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
Dominar 400 vs G 310 R vs 390 Duke Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Dominar 400 BS6 | G 310 R ABS | 390 Duke BS6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.92 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 2.99 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 2.53 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.3 (307 Ratings) |
4.3 (74 Ratings) |
4.2 (444 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, DOHC, 4 Valve, Liquid-cooled, Triple Spark, FI | Single-Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 313 cc | 373.2 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 40 PS @ 8650 rpm | 34 PS @ 9500 rpm | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | |||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 3.07s | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17dia inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast Aluminium | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, DOHC, 4 Valve, Liquid-cooled, Triple Spark, FI | Single-Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 313 cc | 373.2 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 40 PS @ 8650 rpm | 34 PS @ 9500 rpm | 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 35 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm | 37 Nm @ 7000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 89 mm | 80 mm | 89 mm |
| Stroke | 60 mm | 62.1 mm | 60 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | ... | Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 10.9:1 | ... |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 3.07s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 15.58 s @ 134.99 kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 18.78m | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 32.45m | ... |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ... | 50.61m | ... |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 31.86 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 37 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 35 kmpl | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 7.47s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 18.78m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | USD Telescopic Forks | Upside down fork | WP-Open Cartridge USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Beam type perimeter frame | Tubular spaceframe | Split Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Multi-step adjustable Mono shock with Nitrox | Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load adjustable | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 150/60-R17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17dia inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ... | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast Aluminium | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | ... | ... |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ... | ... | 163 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 2156*836*1112 | 2005*820*1080 | ... |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1453 mm | 1374 mm | 1357 |
| Length | 2156 mm | 2005 mm | ... |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | ... | 185 mm |
| Height | 1112 mm | 1080 mm | ... |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 785 mm | 830 mm |
| Width | 836 mm | 820 mm | ... |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 11 L | 13.5 L |
| Total Weight | ... | 345 kg | ... |
| Tail Light | LED | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 320 mm | 300 mm | 320 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 240 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | VRLA | MF | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | LED Pilot Lamps | ... | ... |
| LED tail lights | ... | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb | LED |
| Alternator | ... | 308 W | ... |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Single | Split |
| Pass Switch | |||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | ... | Digital | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ... | ||
| Clock | ... | Digital | |
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | ||
| Stepup Seat | ... | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ... | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
News Updates on Dominar 400 and G 310 R
-
Eco-friendly Bajaj Dominar 400 Is Here
The BS6 update comes with a marginal price hike
Apr 2, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
Owning A BMW G 310 R Or G 310 GS Just Got A Lot More Affordable
The twins are being offered at their ex-showroom price for a limited time period
Dec 12, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
EXCLUSIVE: The Bajaj Dominar 400 BS6 Makes Almost The Same Power As Before
The BS6 update has resulted in a minor price hike of Rs 1,749 over the BS4 model
Mar 9, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
BMW Issues Recall For G310 R, G310 GS In International Markets
BMW Motorrad India is yet to confirm if the recall applies for units sold on our shores too
Aug 29, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which bike should be owned between Bajaj 2019 Dominar 400 and KTM Duke 390?
- For long-ride performance, mileage and durability Bajaj Dominar 400 will be the best option. Moreover, we would suggest you take the test drive of the vehicles so that you can understand the difference between the options which will help you to make a final decision for your purchase - Bike Dealer
- If You Go Only for Power You Better Go for KTM RC390 , because Dominar is 34.5 bhp @ 8000 rpm , RC390 Have 44 bhp @ 9000 rpm , Power is Higher , But You'll Be a eye Catcher even in less Powered Dominar , You'll Have Better Mileage and Low Maintenance Comparing to RC in Dominar
- Would suggest u to take a test ride. I tried both, and for my physique I felt dominor was comfortable. I am 6.1ft. From the reviews I got from the KTM personnel, the bike is powerful and easy to maneuver but high on maintenance! M a very satisfied with my dominor.
Q. Which one will be the better option out of Dominar 400 and KTM 390 in terms of overall performance, design and comfort? Please help.
- If you are looking for a bike with better acceleration, ruthless performance, better features and more sporty trail, you can go for the KTM 390. If the comfort is your main preference with a decent amount of power and great suspension setup for long tours you may opt Dominar 400. The KTM has been provided with riding modes with TFT display being one of the major features. The Dominar 400 gets features which totally justify the worth the bike as well.However, we would suggest you take a test ride of both the bikes regarding the comfort, features and ride quality.Click here for the dealership: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- Hi,Ktm is any better as the bike is light weight and has a better build quality but the bike has a hard seat and engine get heated more than dominar. So if you have a bigger budget go with ktm however dominar is heavy but best value for money bike with just 3 PS less power than ktm
- KTM is lighter. performance and handling is better. it has better display. But Dominar is value for money. reliable. maintenance will not hit
Q. Which is the best bike in between Dominar, Mojo and Duke 200 for touring and leisure rides and daily commuter?
View More Questions
- If you will be using the bike for more highway touring than city commutes then the Mahindra Mojo could be a good option with its more comfortable seating stance whereas, Bajaj Dominar could be a good option if you want a more balanced out bike for highway touring and city commutes. Moreover, taking a test ride of the bikes would also clear some of the doubts so we'd recommend going for that. Click on the link for New Bike Showrooms.Read more:- 2019 Bajaj Dominar 400: First Ride Review
- Bajaj dominar is a versatile bike for commutes and tours.mojo is good for highways.while the duke 200 will offer a smaller engine.you can go for the duke 200 if your first question is 'kitna deti hai'
- Dominar 400
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
