TVS Apache 200 4V Race vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison
TVS Apache 200 4V Race vs Yamaha R15 V3
Yamaha YZF R15 V3 Price starts at Rs. 1.41 lakh which is Rs. 29,035 costlier than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 priced at Rs. 1.12 lakh. The claimed mileage for the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is 48.8 kmpl. In technical specifications, TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is powered by 197.75 cc engine where as Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is powered by 155 cc engine. TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is available in 8 different colours while Yamaha YZF R15 V3 comes with 1 colours. 53% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 over Yamaha YZF R15 V3 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs Yamaha YZF R15 V3 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs YZF R15 V3 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 Smart Xonnect | YZF R15 V3 Moto GP Limited Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.15 lakh | Rs. 1.43 lakh |
| Engine Type | SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 197.75 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.95s | 3.40s |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 197.75 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.1 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 66 mm | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 57.8 mm | 58.7 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | IDI - Multi curve digital Ignition | TCI (Transistor controlled ignition) |
| Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 11.6:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.95s | 3.40s |
| Quarter Mile | 17.37s@118.83kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 19.93 mm | |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 34.15 mm | |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 51.67 mm | |
| Mileage (City) | 48.75 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 47.92 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | 45 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 11.42s | |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 19.93 mm |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Hydraulic dampers | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF | Delta Box |
| Suspension-Rear | Mono shock suspension | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2018*790*1105 | 1990*725*1135 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1353 mm | 1325 mm |
| Length | 2018 mm | 1990 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 180 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 1105 mm | 1135 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 815 mm |
| Width | 790 mm | 725 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 11 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 270 mm | 282 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ETZ-5 | |
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Clock | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Navigation | Yes | |
| Mobile Connectivity | No |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakhvsApache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs Bullet 350Bullet 350Rs. 1.22 lakh -
Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakhvsApache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs Pulsar NS200Pulsar NS200Rs. 1.14 lakh
-
Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakhvsApache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
-
Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakhvsApache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs Pulsar 220 FPulsar 220 FRs. 1.08 lakh
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is best, Apache RTR 200 Fi 4V or Yamaha R15 V3?
- Yamaha R15 V3 is best overall bike but there is much price difference between the two.If you like sport segment bike then go with V3 or else go with 200.Take a test ride of both bikes first.
- Go for rtr 200 if u have to travel more on daily basis, as it has more comfortable ergonomics as compared to r15 v.3. Performance wise there is slight different manner in which they produce power as rtr has good low and mid range, and r15 has terrific top end.
- Both are meant for different category people. if near straight position is important for you then apache is the right choice. if you are ok with forward leaning position then you can go for R15. Interms of performance both are winners
Q. Which one is better between R15 V3 and RS200?
- We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. On the other hand, the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 certainly scores a few brownie points when it comes to engine refinement and performance. It is also well loaded with nifty features such as projector headlamps with LED DRLs, a backlit semi-digital instrument console and ABS. All in all, those looking for an affordable, fully-faired bike with sporty characteristics, the RS200 is certainly an attractive buy. Read More: - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566 - 2017 Bajaj Pulsar RS 200: First Ride Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/2017-bajaj-pulsar-rs-200-first-ride-review/27398
- Now r15 v3 it has the race DNA and track ergonomics.Yamaha this time didnt compromise performance for looks as in a v2.Its the best in 150 cc segment..Rc 200 is a track oriented race machine if you are a beginner go for r15.rv is a great choice which can be compared to Apache rtr or cbr 350 or rr 310 from the.
- If you want more aggressive riding posture and you are corner enthusiastic then you should go for r15 v3 and you can also do weekend rides on it if you want want to go for long rides without taking many stops then rs200 is a good option
Q. Which one is the best bike Yamaha R15 V3 or Yamaha MT-15?
- Yamaha YZF R15 is more of a track based bike with a rider tucked in whereas the MT-15 is all about the sports and everyday touring with a more comfortable riding position. If you are looking for a bike to ride in the city as well as on the race track with a bit less aggressive racing ergonomics go with the naked sports Yamaha MT-15 but if you are looking for a bike with sporty edges, full of torque and Sporty Stance go with the Yamaha R15 V3. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride of both the bikes so that you may evaluate the bikes on the basis of your outlook toward the ride quality, features and comfort.Click here to get a detailed comparison: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/yamaha-mt-15-vs-yamaha-yzf-r15-v3 Click here for the dealer details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers/Yamaha
- Of course it's R15V3 which is value for money as compared to MT15... But you may get riding position problem for atleast 1week because of the new riding position..... We need to become more suitable For every new environment we get in to..
- Depends upon you as both the bikes offer the same power and performance. On 1 hand MT-15 is lighter than the R15 v3 but also R15 v3 is more streamline which means it is more aerodynamic which decreases its fuel consumption. Also MT-15 is a naked bike and has a better sitting position.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
