Jawa Perak vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Comparison
Jawa Perak vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Price starts at Rs. 2.72 lakh which is Rs. 76,174 costlier than Jawa Perak priced at Rs. 1.96 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Jawa Perak is NA where as the claimed mileage for Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is 25 kmpl. In technical specifications, Jawa Perak is powered by 334 cc engine where as Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is powered by 648 cc engine. Jawa Perak is available in 1 different colours while Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 comes with 1 colours. 61% users have chosen Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 over Jawa Motorcycles Perak in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Jawa Perak vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC BS-VI Engine | 4 Stroke, Air-Oil cooled, SOHC Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 334 cc | 648 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 30 PS | 47.65 PS @ 7250 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 31 Nm | 52 Nm @ 5250 rpm |
| Bore | 81 mm | 78 mm |
| Stroke | 65 mm | 67.8 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 2 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital spark ignition - TCI | |
| Compression Ratio | 11:01 | 9.5:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ||
| Quarter Mile | ||
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ||
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | ||
| Mileage (Highway) | ||
| Mileage (Overall) | 25 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ||
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ||
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Hydraulic Fork | Front Fork |
| Chassis | Double cradle Tubular Frame | Steel Tubular, Double Cradle Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Mono Shock Absorber, 7 Step Adjustable | Twin Coil-Over Shocks |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/90-18 Rear :-140/70-17 | Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-18 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-18 inch Rear :-17 inch | Front :-18 inch, Rear :-18 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tube | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Spoke | Spoke |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 20 psi | |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 2122*744*1024 | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1485 mm | 1398 mm |
| Length | 2122 mm | |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 174 mm | |
| Height | 1024 mm | |
| Seat Height | 750 mm | 793 mm |
| Width | 744 mm | |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 14 L | 12.5 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 280 mm | 320 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 240 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ||
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Cruiser Bikes | Cafe Racer Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | ||
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air and Oil Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Analogue and Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | No |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is good to buy Duke 390 or Continental GT 650?
- Althought there Is not really comparison but i understand why u ask this question althought gt looks like sports bike but trust me it is not i own one If u want a light weight bike for daily commute touring or just going around city fast with very good corner cutting ability with very good handling u should go for ktm. If u want a lifesyle bike good looking which makes u standout from crowd which will have some mystry to it only then u buy gt its only for weekends its heavy not good handling when compared to gt too heavy when comparied to duke funtionaly not as good as duke only reason to buy gt is for its better looking retro charm. design is forever everything about this bike has been setup for longterm use if u buy gt never want to sell it only then go for gtAnd u should have height of atlest 5.8 although 5.10 is the proper average for it
- Royal Enfield GT 650 and KTM Duke 390 both the bikes come from a very different background. The Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is a cafe racer whereas the KTM Duke 390 is a Naked sports bike. The RE Continental GT 650 is powered by 2 cylinder twin parallel 4 stroke engine whereas the KTM Duke 390 is powered by a single cylinder 4 stroke engine. If you are more of a tourer we would suggest you go for Royal Enfield GT 650 but if you are more of a racer who loves to zip through the city, then go for KTM Duke 390.Click on the link below for more details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/ktm-duke-390-abs-vs-royal-enfield-continental-gt-650
- Duke 390 and continental gt both are different revving engines, if u want enormous power delivery and always to filter the city i think duke is better option,but if u want a retro looking bike and want a parallel twin with an amazing exhaust and sporty yet not a top end cruiser .and want a pure machine like feel when you ride then its Gt for u, anyway take a test ride of both and decide
Q. What is best between continental or interceptor
- Continental is a pakka cafe racer...and it looks more attractive than interceptor,I think both the bikes have equal performance including top speed,the main difference is its "RIDING COMFORT". U must test drive both the bikes if ur willing to buy these bikes.Tnq💥
- Continental GT is a little bit advanced in the case of acceleration, cornering etc. than interceptor.
- I am a gt650 owner but i think Interceptor is much better than this
Q. I wanted to purchase between Continental GT 650 and Interceptor 650 but confused.
- What do u prefer more funtionality (interceptor ) or good looks (gt 650). Are u willing to sacrifice comfort for some good cornering them go for gt if ur lookimg for short rider then gt if looking for touring long rides then interceptor if want good 2 seater then interceptor if for solo mostly then gt occaional pillion rider then gt. If ur porpose is impress women then difinetly gt coz that ride posture is more aggressive makes u look strong its like ur on this heavy looking bike ur shoulders really arms look agressive thats the actual reason of that sitting posture people like gt more specially chrome model bcoz it looks so good on road u stand out of crowd and yes functionally interceptor is a better package its all about using the bike that bike is more versatile both bike are designed for people with diferent personalities and yes u should test ride then to feel then in real world only then u will know what i mean
- Bro for a sporty feeling u shuld choose GT650 otherwise if u are a tourer u shuld go for Interceptor 650 choice is yours in how the way u ride for.. But for a short tour and a sporty feel u shld go for Gt650
- Continental GT 650 is a cafe racer type, whereas interceptor is touring bike.now you have to decide what is your purpose.Frequent touring then go for interceptor else if your purpose is city ride and occasional touring then continental GT 650
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
