TVS Apache 200 4V Race vs Yamaha FZ 25 Comparison
TVS Apache 200 4V Race vs Yamaha FZ 25
Yamaha FZ 25 Price starts at Rs. 1.35 lakh which is Rs. 9,680 costlier than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 priced at Rs. 1.25 lakh. The claimed mileage for the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ 25 is 45.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is powered by 197.75 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine. TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 is available in 8 different colours while Yamaha FZ 25 comes with 1 colours. 50% users have chosen Yamaha FZ 25 over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0 vs Yamaha FZ 25 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
Apache RTR 200 4V vs FZ 25 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Apache RTR 200 4V STD | FZ 25 Moto GP Limited Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.25 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.37 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.2 (535 Ratings) |
4.2 (445 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine BS-VI | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 197.75cc | 249 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm | 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | 3.77s |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Insurance | Rs. 9,140Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance | Rs. 10,110FZ 25 Insurance |
Engine
| Engine Type | SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine BS-VI | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 197.75cc | 249 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm | 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 16.8 Nm @ 7500 rpm | 20 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 |
| Bore | 66 mm | 74 mm |
| Stroke | 57.8 mm | 58 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Mapped ignition system | ... |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5-speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.9s | 3.77s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 17.32s@117.22 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 2.89s, 15.85mm |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 3.61s, 30.02mm |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 45.6 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 31.17 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 35 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 10.33s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 2.89s, 15.85mm |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Forks | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame | Daimond |
| Suspension-Rear | Mono-Tube - Mono Shock | Swingarm (Monocross) |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | ... | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2050*790*1050 | 2015*770*1075 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1353 mm | 1360 mm |
| Length | 2050 mm | 2015 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 180 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1050 mm | 1075 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 795 mm |
| Width | 790 mm | 770 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 14 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 270 mm | 282 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ... | |
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Low Oil Indicator | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Navigation | ... | |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... |
News Updates on Apache RTR 200 4V and FZ 25
-
BS6 TVS Apache RTR 160 4V & RTR 200 4V: Review In ImagesAre the BS6 Apaches less exciting?
Dec 13, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Here’s How The Yamaha FZ 25 BS6 Is Different From Its BS4 Counterpart
The all new fascia certainly makes the BS5 FZ 25 look more futuristic. What else is different from the BS4-compliant model?
Apr 8, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
BS6 vs BS4 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V: Difference Explained In Pictures
Besides the BS6 motor, the new Apache RTR 200 4V is a lot different than its BS4 iteration. We explain the differences via images
Dec 11, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Updated Yamaha 250cc Naked Launching Soon
The motorcycle has been teased on Yamaha’s social media page
Apr 7, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Is this bike worth to buy? Please help me to know any pros. and cons. about this bike or any other bike in this segment. - FZ 25?
- Bro. I've owned this bike for around 2 years now. The bike is great and everything. Its good a good and peppy engine. Great milage considering the power it has. Extremely comfortable seats. The main downside i came across was the weak headlight unit. You could very well get an aftermarket LED fitted on it or go for fog lamps. 6th gear is a problem only when the bike is pushed hard. In normal city driving and highway runs you won't need a 6th gear. The service and maintenance cost of the bike is very less as with all Yamaha bikes. Also it is ultra reliable and won't need too many services
- Hello. The 2019 model gets dual channel Abs.
- Pros- Good pickup, Nice accelerating, Good for both city and highway driving. mileage in best with 250 cc segment and it's almost low budget bike in 250 cc also. service center available everywhere cons- Air cooled Bike, little problem in engine hitting specially on long drive and on summer season. Old and 1st model don't have ABS that's a badluck. silencer got rusted with more heat power from engine and even after repeated paint by the showroom still its again looks like iron parts. but still overall it's amazing bike
Q. I wish to buy FZ25, people are confusing me kindly suggest a better bike under 2 lakhs?
- If your budget is 2lakhs than you have a lot of options like Yamaha FZ-25 Duke 200, 250, Bajaj Dominar, RE Thunderbird 350X and many more and Dont listen to what people say listen to what you want, If you choose Yamaha FZ25 you get a good bike in a very good price, the build quality is superb, suspension are very good, performance power is also very good looks are amazing, riding comfort on short ride as well as long rides its very good in every condition and a very good mileage of 35-40kmpl similarly Thunderbird 350X os also a very good choice. Take a test ride and decide which is good for you. Hope you make a better choice don't listen to anyone who says bad about any bike, no bike is bad every bike is good. A bike or a car is like a family member.
- If your budget is 2 lakh I suggest to go for a royal Enfield if you are a RE fan. Else you can go with fz25/dominor. Go for dominor you will love the ride
- Bro if not fz25 then go for dominar 400 but in my opinion fz25 is best bike under 2L for daily commute and occasionally touring
Q. Which one should i buy FZ 25 or Thunderbird 350X or MT 15 considering price point,mileage and long term use?
View More Questions
- If you need dual channel abs+ little bit more power+ pillion comfort then fz25 or if these things doesn't bother you much then of course mt15 is an overall better package .Do not go for Bajaj bikes as they are known for very less reliability and sudden problems on road (even with proper maintenance)
- Thunderbird 350 for Durability, Performance MT -15, both performance n riding comfort FZ 25
- I would suggest fz25 due to it's price and features with maintenance charges and after sale service, thunderbird is a high maintenance bike but it is of different segment.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
