KTM Duke 200 vs Yamaha FZ 25 Comparison
KTM Duke 200 vs Yamaha FZ 25
KTM 200 Duke Price starts at Rs. 1.52 lakh which is Rs. 17,077 costlier than Yamaha FZ 25 priced at Rs. 1.35 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM 200 Duke is 35 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ 25 is 45.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM 200 Duke is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by 249 cc engine. KTM 200 Duke is available in 4 different colours while Yamaha FZ 25 comes with 1 colours. 52% users have chosen Yamaha FZ 25 over KTM 200 Duke in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM 200 Duke vs Yamaha FZ 25 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, DOHC Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 249 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25.83 PS @ 10,000 rpm | 20.9 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 19.5 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 20 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Bore | 72 mm | 74 mm |
| Stroke | 49 mm | 58 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Ignition | |
| Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 5-speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.77s | |
| Quarter Mile | 17.32s@117.22 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 2.89s, 15.85mm | |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 3.61s, 30.02mm | |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | 45.6 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 31.17 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | 35 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 35 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 10.33s | |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 2.89s, 15.85mm |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | WP Upside Down 43 mm | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Steel Trellis Frame, Powder Coated | Daimond |
| Suspension-Rear | WP monoshock | Swingarm (Monocross) |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 134 kg | |
| Length*Width*Height | 2050*730*810 | 2015*770*1075 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1367 mm | 1360 mm |
| Length | 2050 mm | 2015 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 170 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 810 mm | 1075 mm |
| Seat Height | 810 mm | 795 mm |
| Width | 730 mm | 770 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 11 L | 14 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 282 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ||
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | no | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | Yes | |
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | No |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which should be preferred FZ25 vs KTM 200 - Duke 200?
- If you need something fun... Reliable and premium go for Duke... If you re lookin for daily commute and leisure go for the fz.
- Fz 25 will be best every aspects but if u need initial pick up and aggressive riding style you should go for duke 200
- Most valuable and fantastic blog. I really appreciate your work which you have done about KTM 200 DUKE, many thanks and keep it up.KTM 200 DUKE
Q. Is this bike worth to buy? Please help me to know any pros. and cons. about this bike or any other bike in this segment. - FZ 25?
- Bro. I've owned this bike for around 2 years now. The bike is great and everything. Its good a good and peppy engine. Great milage considering the power it has. Extremely comfortable seats. The main downside i came across was the weak headlight unit. You could very well get an aftermarket LED fitted on it or go for fog lamps. 6th gear is a problem only when the bike is pushed hard. In normal city driving and highway runs you won't need a 6th gear. The service and maintenance cost of the bike is very less as with all Yamaha bikes. Also it is ultra reliable and won't need too many services
- Hello. The 2019 model gets dual channel Abs.
- Pros- Good pickup, Nice accelerating, Good for both city and highway driving. mileage in best with 250 cc segment and it's almost low budget bike in 250 cc also. service center available everywhere cons- Air cooled Bike, little problem in engine hitting specially on long drive and on summer season. Old and 1st model don't have ABS that's a badluck. silencer got rusted with more heat power from engine and even after repeated paint by the showroom still its again looks like iron parts. but still overall it's amazing bike
Q. Which is good to buy between Pulsar RS 200 and KT M Duke 200
- Firstly, the character of both bikes are different from each other.. The DUKE 200 is high revving motor and has hell lot of power and concentrated at low end you end up falling and loving instantly, but the problem is as it was concentrated at low end there is no power left at topend and struggles to stay at triple digits speed and to cruise but in city you'll have hell lot of fun. The quality is good & maintenance is on higher side compared to RS 200..When comes to RS200 it is butter smooth and power delivery is linear and topend is high compared to duke 200 because of it's long gear ratios and when comes to quality the panels and plastics of RS200 isn't that great they vibrate a lot and endup rattling after few days and The maintenance is on cheaper side and costs half the duke 200 maintenance.
- If you want quick acceleration,much lighter weight , looks and want to do stunts then go for duke . But if you want sports bike like feel , good mileage of around 32 -35 kmpl , better top speed of 155kmph , soothing sound , ABS and all this at less price then Go for RS200 . I own RS200 now for 3 years . No problem at all .
- Firstly the character and tuning is different from each other.. The Duke 200 is a high revving engine with lots of power at low end and instantly you'll fall in love but u
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
