Q. Which is better either 180F or 220F

180 F bs6 model, don't go for 220f. I am not being biased both are good bikes but value for money will be 180f comes with 4v beside 220f comes only with 2v engine.

For daily commute in the city, I will suggest you the 180F. And for touring, highway rides 220F will be better. But it doesn't mean that 180F is bad in highways. In short, 220F is more powerful and 180F's milage is better than 220F. Now you have to decide, for which purpose you are buying the bike.

Definitely Pulsar 220f if you are looking for power coupled with speed. Fuel economy though is low. But the bike really rocks.

It totally depends on what you want, if you are looking for more power, willing to open the trottle on the highways and have that extra budget then definitely go for the pulsar 220f abs version

Instead of going with 180 you can take 220 because it is little more costs than 180.

You want for better mileage you can get 180f you want more pickup and power you get 220f and you used on more city circle you get 180f or highway circle you get 220f

Pulsar 220 f is better with good power, but 180 is gud for everyday use

Obviously 220F because it has more torque and power .. 220cc engine .. Better acceleration and top speed than 180F..

180f is best as of now

Value for money 180f

2000000000000000000000000000020times 220f.I dont know why bajaj came up with this 180f idea,so sad.😭😭

I fell 180f

180f

220F

220g

180f

Hii

Yes

Both bike are good and same but it depend on you that how much power do you want.....

Comparing to 180 F, 220F is best one, very stylish and price is only less more..

180 f why ? mileage more than 220f to 180f so 180 f perfect chise

Buy 180F it's good

Both if u like more power and pickup go for 220 f

Definitely 220F is more time best

Yes I have done around 350kms

Maintenance costs is low

Pulsar 220F is the best

Milage is better

Both bike better

180F is good

220 f

180f

180f

220F

Both

220f

180f

Both

220F

220F

220f

220

220

220