Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Expert Reviews


Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Overview

Top Competitors of Pulsar NS200

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 User Reviews

4.3 /5
802 Rating & 276 reviews
  • Performance
  • Mileage
  • Comfort
  • + 2 more
  • Maintenance Cost
  • Features & Styling

Preferred For : Daily Commute

52% of users have given a rating of 4.5 and above

Add a Review
  • Most Relevant
  • Latest
  • 4.6

    Well after duke this thing is much capable than any 200cc or even 250. Foolish people shout out for RTR 200 but RTR not even comparable with NS 200. NS is much more musculer, aggressive in road presence. I own a bs4 and trust me it's way too smooth. The only con of this bike is lack of low end torque. You have to downshift every time you go through a speed breakers or bad roads. This thing comes alive after 4/5 k rpm and show its full potential post 6 to 7 k rpm. NS is not for everyone bike but RTR does. Maintenance costs and cost of spare parts are pocket friendly. However NS's engine derived from duke 200 and it's a detuned version of duke so1it's not a hooligan machine. But in top speed due to curb set up this thing Is even Faster than FZ 25 and duke1250.

  • 4.6

    It's a overall good bike compare to duke 200 because it's a bike which you will get in low price and good quality of parts. I had rated 4.6 because I had done many ride on my beast but seat cushion are little bit hard. So for comfort Bajaj should improve that..And if I talk about mileage, it's been 4.5 year of my bike and still gives 35kmpl. If you maintain your beast it will give you best performance....

  • 3.4

    It's a nice powerful bike. But it's not for daily commute mainly when you are travelling in traffic areas. Seat height is little extra. Because of seat height you can not bend the bike with confidence if you are not a perfect rider. Weight is not well balanced as its heavier on front. Top speed I have achieved 146 On Bangalore Airport Highway. But it skids when sudden breaks are not applied properly . I own a fz too. Fz is better in control and very good for daily commute. Even for long rides if you are not a speed lover then fz is better as its very comfortable seating posture. But if you compare everything like pricing, features and power then Ns 200 is better but it should be driven carefully always because more power means more risk.

  • 4.6

    Power packed beast and is best in budget 200cc segment. I have non stop 470 on this baby. Still no signs of any problem. Very good for trips. I have done Shimla, Manali, Rishikesh trip with this bike. No issues at any point. Mileage of bike is bad in city (30-32) but once this bike given me 40+ average on 80-90km/hr on Yamuna Express way. Maintenance cost is low and yes much customisation is possible.

  • 4.6

    What can I say, with the price of just 1.33L this bike is like a magic carpet. It's fast, it's comfortable and more importantly it's unpredictable. The acceleration is insane as well as the power. But the engine braking is where Bajaj should look at. There is no TFT display and fuel injector. Apart from that if you are going to seek my opinion, I would gladly say just go for it.

All Pulsar NS200 User Reviews
  • 5.0

    heavy and fantastic .. easy to handle fast moving bike and good look

  • 1.8

    No doubt bike is good after the performance is getting low averagely day by day and milage also decreases. I'm happy with the maintenance cost9f the bike but milage is disappointed me.

  • 5.0

    more then 2 years like this bike

  • 4.2

    thrilling ridesmore comfortable to ride long

  • 4.6

    One of the value for money bike

All Pulsar NS200 User Reviews