Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Price starts at Rs. 1.42 lakh which is Rs. 1.42 lakh costlier than Bajaj Pulsar NS200 priced at Rs. To Be Announced. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 7 different colours while Bajaj Pulsar RS200 comes with 7 colours. 57% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar RS200 over Bajaj Pulsar NS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar NS200 vs Pulsar RS200 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar NS200 ABS | Pulsar RS200 Dual ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.14 lakh | Rs. 1.43 lakh |
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 23.5 PS @ 9500 rpm | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.86s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 36.1 kmpl | 35 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear:-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 23.5 PS @ 9500 rpm | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 11.2:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | ... | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.86s | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 16.47m | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 39.7 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 36.1 kmpl | 35 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 12.58s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 16.47m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | Perimeter Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear:-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2017*804*1075 | 1999*765*1114 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1363 mm | 1345 mm |
| Length | 2017 mm | 1999 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 169 mm | 157 mm |
| Height | 1075 mm | 1114 mm |
| Seat Height | ... | 800 mm |
| Width | 804 mm | 765 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 13 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | DC MF |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ... | Dual Projector |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ... | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | ... | 24000 |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Is this bike better than RS200 - Pulsar NS200?
- Loved the looks over rsalso it has perimeter chassis which after riding for 10k km i feel is more comfortable for long rides
- Both are different kind of bikes. It will be wrong to compare them without knowing what is the purpose
- No same bike actually but RS is sporty depends what u like in the past RS has FI when NS didnt
Q. Which is better in top speed NS 200 or RS 200?
- I've clocked max of 132kph & done distances @ upto 120kph on ns200 without any issues,,,rs200 being more aerodynamic design should be slightly better...
- Same engine for both.. but the heavy kit of rs is a disadvantage when it comes to performance
- Probably RS since little for s tramlines and aerodynamic
Q. Which
is better among Apache 200 4v and Pulsar NS200
- It depends on whats your priority comfort or performanceif comfort then Apache if performance then nsi have the apache and my brother has ns so there is not much of a difference between the two
- Apache 200 4v provide best comfort because is have slipper clutch and gear shifting is too much smooth which require in city....
- Ns200
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
