Yamaha FZ V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison
Yamaha FZ V3 vs Yamaha MT 15
Yamaha MT 15 Price starts at Rs. 1.37 lakh which is Rs. 37,400 costlier than Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 99,200. The claimed mileage for the Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha MT 15 is 48.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine where as Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 1 colours. 68% users have chosen Yamaha MT-15 over Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs Yamaha MT 15 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
FZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs MT-15 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | FZ-Fi Version 3.0 STD | MT-15 STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 99,200 | Rs. 1.37 lakh |
| Engine Type | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 4.21s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 50 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 57.3 mm | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 57.9 mm | 58.7 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Transistor controlled ignition | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.6:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 4.21s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 17.99 s @ 113.74 kmpl |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 38.25 m, 3.92 secm |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ... | 63.43 m, 4.92 secm |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 48.58 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 52.02 kmph |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 45 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 50 kmpl | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 12.08s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Diamond | Delta Box |
| Suspension-Rear | Swingarm | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-R17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1990*780*1080 | 2020*800*1070 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1330 mm | 1335 mm |
| Length | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 155 mm |
| Height | 1080 mm | 1070 mm |
| Seat Height | 790 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 780 mm | 800 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12.8 L | 10 L |
| Tail Light | Bulb | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | ... | 282 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | ... | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Sealed Type | ETZ-5 |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | Optional | ... |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ... | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is best MT-15 or Duke 125?
- According to your question ,MT 15 is more comfort with a power full engine.duke 125 is not bad ,it has 124 cc engine but it compitating with 150 cc bikes.both are good.
- Well looking at price point I would say duke 125 is worth it but if you are looking for power then definitely go for mt-15 . Even though mt-15 has bigger cc engine it can still provide 50 km mileage .Note : Does not know the mileage capabilities of duke 125.
- First thing both are quite overpriced for what they offer and there are lot other bikes that offer good performance at a better price looks aren't the only thing that matters prefer indian brands they offer better quality and at low cost
Q. Which is good to buy, FZ Fi V3 and FZ-S Fi V3?
- If you notice between the two there is not much of a difference because the dimensions, engine, performance, ergonomics everything is same. it all boils down to one thing, do you want a engine guard and body graphics or not. If you want then you can go for FZS Fi V3, if not FZ Fi V3.
- Basically there is no such great difference in both.in fz s u will have a engine guard and chrome garnish. and yes if you want maate colour gofor fz s and if u like glossy go for fz
- If you require better performance, you may opt for FZ FI V3 on the other hand, you may opt for FZ S FI V3, it you require better fuel efficiency. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
Q. Should I buy FZ S FI or TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
- Go for fz v3. people are saying that the 4v is having super smooth engine but believe me I have ridden it and I feel the difference in riding my fz and 4v the 4v is having little bit more vibration than fz. even the looks of fz are attractive with fuel injection and single channel ABS in standard . GO FOR FZ . because it's YAMAHA
- If you want speed, pick up and sporty ride feel then go for Apache RTR 160 4V; but if you would want mileage, comfort and effective braking then you should go for FZS-FI.
- Between these two bikes, our pick will be TVS Apache RTR 160 4V as known for its quick handling dynamics and rev-happy engine, the TVS Apache is one fun-to-ride motorcycle in its class. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
