Suzuki Gixxer 2019 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 Comparison
Suzuki Gixxer 2019 vs TVS Apache RTR 160
Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at Rs. 1.00 lakh which is Rs. 12,433 costlier than TVS Apache RTR 160 priced at Rs. 87,778. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki 2019 Gixxer is 50.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RTR 160 is 60 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine where as TVS Apache RTR 160 is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer is available in 1 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 comes with 1 colours. 54% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 over Suzuki 2019 Gixxer in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
2019 Gixxer vs Apache RTR 160 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | 2019 Gixxer STD | Apache RTR 160 Dual Disc ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.00 lakh | Rs. 90,857 |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 155 cc | 159.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm | 15.11 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.53s | 5.27s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 60 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 155 cc | 159.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm | 15.11 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 13.03 Nm @ 6500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 56 mm | 62 mm |
| Stroke | 62.9 mm | 52.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | IDI-Dual Mode Digital Ignition |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.53s | 5.27s |
| Quarter Mile | 20.07 s @ 99.98 kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 17.06 m,m | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 31.47 mm | ... |
| Mileage (City) | 50.58 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 49.7 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 30 kmpl |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 60 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 20.10s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 17.06 m,m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic Forks with Hydraulic Dampers |
| Chassis | ... | Double Cradle Synchro STIFF |
| Suspension-Rear | Swing Arm, Mono Suspension | Monotube Inverted Gas-filled shox (MIG) with spring aid |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17 | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ... | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2020*800*1035 | 2085*730*1105 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1335 mm | 1300 mm |
| Length | 2020 mm | 2085 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 160 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1035 mm | 1105 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | 790 mm |
| Width | 800 mm | 730 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | ... | 270 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | ... | 200 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | Maintenance Free |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ... | AC Generator |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes, Commuter Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | ... | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Analogue and Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | 3 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is the best bike Suzuki Gixxer or Apache RTR 160?
- Both have own priorities gixxer for stylish and fun to drive and apache is for heigh end performance
- Which is more better
Q. Apache RTR 160 4V or Apache RTR 160, which is best?
- If you want to experience signature Apache wild and beast engine, go for Apache 160 (engine vibrations gives a raw feel to rider).If you want a more refined engine like that of Yamaha and Honda, go for 160 4v. There is not any significant difference in mileage.
- Our suggestion would be to go for the TVS Apache 160 4V because It has better safety features and more power with a refined engine. But to know more about this we suggest you take a test ride of the vehicle and then decide. TVS Apache RTR 160 vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison:- https://www.zigwheels.com/bike-comparison/tvs-apache-160-vs-tvs-apache-rtr-160
- The 4v variant is better than the older version because it has all the new aesthetics of the 200 4v including the console which is superb and looks awesome than any other available 160cc displacement vehicle in our country.
Q. Which is best bike Bajaj pulsar 150 or Apache RTR 160?
- The Bajaj Pulsar 150 still remains a great option if you’re looking for an entry-level 150cc motorcycle. The motor offers likeable performance with a hint of brashness which made the Pulsar brand so popular among the youth, and being a Bajaj offering, it has been priced aggressively as well. On the other hand, Apache is known for its quick handling dynamics and rev-happy engine, the TVS Apache is one fun-to-ride motorcycle in its class. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class-leading features. The Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India.Bajaj Pulsar 150 STD gives a mileage of 44.67 kmpl in city and 56.93 kmpl on the highway as claimed by the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI). Apache RTR 160 4V gives 60 Kmpl mileage as claimed by TVS. Though we have tested its on-road performance of carburetted version and we found that it returned 50.9kmpl in the city and managed to deliver the mileage of 56.1kmpl on the highway. Mileage also depends on the riding style and how it is maintained.Do take the test ride for both the bikes to pick one satisfying your needs and requirements.Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- According to me pulser 150 is best bike as compared to tvs apache RTR 160 pulser gives best milage around 50 kmpl low maintenance cost stylish look for daily commuter. coming to Apache RTR 160 sporty bike best for long rider as well as daily commuting RTR gives milage around 45 kmpl , better braking system and its comes with single channel ABS pulser still did not get ABS in 150 segment but it will expect in April. Finally choose bike which is best suit to you according yo your hight and wieght and my final suggestions is test drive bike before you purchase it.
- TVS and Bajaj fans have always been like the two sides of a coin none accepting the other. The Bajaj Pulsar 150 is built for the people who want a great bike for daily commute. It has the essence of a sporty looking and feeling bike and does the job easily, carrying you around town or on the highway. While the TVS Apache RTR 160 is more sturdy, fast, agile, aggressive, but maintaining practicality. Both the bikes are good but on my vote, I would the RTR.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
