TVS Apache 160 4V vs Yamaha FZ V3 Comparison
-
Apache RTR 160 4V
Rs. 1.04 lakhEMI - Rs. 2,996View April Offers
FZ-Fi Version 3.0
TVS Apache 160 4V vs Yamaha FZ V3
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.01 lakh which is Rs. 1,750 costlier than Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 99,200. The claimed mileage for the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is NA. In technical specifications, TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is available in 8 different colours while Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 62% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 4V over Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare TVS Apache RTR 160 4V vs Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
Apache RTR 160 4V vs FZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs 125 Duke Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Apache RTR 160 4V Disc | FZ-Fi Version 3.0 BS6 | 125 Duke BS6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.04 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 99,200View On Road Price | Rs. 1.38 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.1 (965 Ratings) |
4.2 (192 Ratings) |
4.1 (432 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled Engine BS-VI | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 159.7 cc | 149 cc | 124.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 14.5 PS @ 9250 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | |||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled Engine BS-VI | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 159.7 cc | 149 cc | 124.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 14.5 PS @ 9250 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 14.12 Nm @ 7250 rpm | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 12 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs6 | bs6 |
| Bore | 62 mm | 57.3 mm | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 52.9 mm | 57.9 mm | 47.2 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Mapped ignition system | Transistor controlled ignition | ... |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 | ... |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Forks | Telescopic | WP-USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF | Diamond | Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Mono Shock | Swingarm | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-R17 | Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 150/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ... | ... | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ... | ... | 141.4 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 2035*790*1050 | 1990*780*1080 | 1993*789*1083 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1357 mm | 1330 mm | ... |
| Length | 2035 mm | 1990 mm | 1993 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 180 mm | 165 mm | 175 mm |
| Height | 1050 mm | 1080 mm | 1083 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 790 mm | 818 mm |
| Width | 790 mm | 780 mm | 789 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12.8 L | 10.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 270 mm | ... | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 200 mm | ... | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | Sealed Type | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | LED Pilot Lamps | ... | ... |
| LED tail lights | |||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Commuter Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | |||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ... | Optional | ... |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ... | ||
| Clock | Digital | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | ||
| Stepup Seat | |||
| Passenger Footrest | |||
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Air Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Watch Videos of Apache RTR 160 4V and FZ-Fi Version 3.0
News Updates on Apache RTR 160 4V and FZ-Fi Version 3.0
-
Battle Of BS6 Bikes: TVS Apache RTR 160 4V vs Yamaha FZ-S FI V3.0
Here’s how India’s first set of BS6-compliant 160cc nakeds fare on paper
Nov 27, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
2019 Yamaha FZ Fi ABS & FZS Fi ABS: Top 5 Things You Need To Know
From a new design to improved ergonomics, here’s everything that’s changed with the new FZ Fi 150 and FZS Fi 150
Jan 21, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
What’s New About The New TVS Apaches?
Both bikes have been updated to meet BS6 norms, but that’s not all
Nov 27, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
More Aggressive Baby Yamaha FZ Version 3.0 Is Here
Features redesigned bodywork with LED headlamp, new instrument console and a slightly more powerful engine
Jan 21, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
-
Apache RTR 160 4VRs. 1.01 lakhvsApache RTR 160 4V vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is the best bike compared with Honda Hornet, TVS Apache RTR 160 4v, Yamaha FZ S 3.0 in mileage, pickup, comfort, price, service and spares?
- If we compare Fi version of all bike then i think pickup of TVS Apache will be more, according to mileage 1st will be Hornet then Yamaha and then Apache but the difference will be only 4-5 kms.If we come to comfort i own Apache and i didnt find any problem with comfort, and for pricing you should contact dealers in the city.
- I have carb. version of apache its good that your bike is giving such a mileage.
- Bro U have the older version of apache i think The rtr 160 4v gets almost 59-60 on the highways and minimum 48 in city i think u will change ur opinion
Q. Which is the best Apache 160 4v or pulsar ns 160?
- The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hnad, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features. However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
Q. Which variant of RTR 160 4v is better fi or the carburetor?
View More Questions
- The claimed mileage of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is 60kmpl. Although, our experts has tested its carburetted on road and found that it gives class leading figures of 50.9kmpl in the city and 56.1kmpl on the highway. Also, mileage can be differ and depends on one's riding style and how it is maintained.Though we’re yet to test its FI variant, there is a minor difference in the refinement levels of the FI and the carburetted bikes though. The FI is just that little bit smoother, and also offers up a slightly sharper throttle response. And when you’re in the very upper band of the rev range, the FI doesn’t feel out of steam. The carburetted bike on the other hand feels a little gruntier, though it is a little gruff as well. But in many ways the carbed bike feels more enjoyable to ride, thanks to its slightly punchier power delivery in the mid range. In case of long rides, it might bother you to take a break due to its aggressive riding position.
- I love carburettor variant because we can tune the carburettor.. and low maintanence and if there's a problem in fuel injection you can't modify you have to buy a new fi system which is costly... there is no such a big difference in mileage is rarely 2-4 km and i don't think it's a big deal
- See obviously fi varient is better..but if you ride on long routes then i will suggest you to opt for the carburettor varient because if in any case your bike brokes down then the carburettor engine can be repaired by anyone... on the other hand the fi engine is a bit more complex to repair.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
