KTM RC 200 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison
-
RC 200
Rs. 1.97 lakhEMI - Rs. 5,669Get Loan starting @9.7%
YZF R15 V3
KTM RC 200 vs Yamaha R15 V3
KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 1.97 lakh which is Rs. 55,888 costlier than Yamaha YZF R15 V3 priced at Rs. 1.41 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM RC 200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is 48.8 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Yamaha YZF R15 V3 is powered by 155 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 2 different colours while Yamaha YZF R15 V3 comes with 1 colours. 51% users have chosen KTM RC 200 over Yamaha YZF R15 V3 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM RC 200 vs Yamaha YZF R15 V3 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
RC 200 vs YZF R15 V3 vs 200 Duke Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | RC 200 BS6 | YZF R15 V3 Moto GP Limited Edition | 200 Duke BS6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.97 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.43 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.73 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.2 (503 Ratings) |
4.3 (1169 Ratings) |
4.2 (772 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 155 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | |||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 3.40s | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 4-Valve, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 155 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25 PS @ 10000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 19.2 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm | 19.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 72 mm | 58 mm | 72 mm |
| Stroke | 49 mm | 58.7 mm | 49 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment | TCI (Transistor controlled ignition) | Digital Ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 14.5:1 | 11.6:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6-Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 3.40s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 17.37s@118.83kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 19.93 mm | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 34.15 mm | ... |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ... | 51.67 mm | ... |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 48.75 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 47.92 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 45 kmpl | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 11.42s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 19.93 mm | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | WP-USD Ø 43 mm | Telescopic Fork | WP-USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Steel Trellis Frame | Delta Box | Split Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | WP Monoshock | Swingarm | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | |||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 154.3 kg | ... | 150.3 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 1978*688*1098 | 1990*725*1135 | 2050*730*810 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1340 mm | 1325 mm | 1367 mm |
| Length | 1978 mm | 1990 mm | 2050 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 178.5 mm | 170 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 1098 mm | 1135 mm | 810 mm |
| Seat Height | 835 mm | 815 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 688 mm | 725 mm | 730 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 9.5 L | 11 L | 13.5 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 282 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 220 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ... | ETZ-5 | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | ... | |
| LED tail lights | |||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | |||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | |||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | ||
| Distance to Empty | ... | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | |||
| Clock | |||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | ||
| Stepup Seat | ... | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | |||
| Passenger Footrest | |||
| Projector Headlights | ... | ... | |
| Passenger Backrest | ... | ... | |
| Underseat storage | ... | ... | |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ... | ... | |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... | ... |
News Updates on RC 200 and YZF R15 V3
-
KTM RC 200: Same Price, Other Options
We list other two-wheelers you can buy for the price of a KTM RC 200
Jul 31, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
BS6-compliant Yamaha R15 V3.0 And Fascino Coming Next Month
The BS6 R15, as well as the Fascino, might get a drop in power
Nov 12, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Finally! KTM RC200 Gets Single-channel ABS
Apart from the 250 Duke, KTM’s entire range of motorcycles is now equipped with ABS
Jan 22, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Yamaha R15, FZ25 And R3 Get a Bit More Expensive
Thankfully, these price hikes are rather small
Oct 15, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is better between R15 V3 and RS200?
- We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. On the other hand, the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 certainly scores a few brownie points when it comes to engine refinement and performance. It is also well loaded with nifty features such as projector headlamps with LED DRLs, a backlit semi-digital instrument console and ABS. All in all, those looking for an affordable, fully-faired bike with sporty characteristics, the RS200 is certainly an attractive buy. Read More: - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566 - 2017 Bajaj Pulsar RS 200: First Ride Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/2017-bajaj-pulsar-rs-200-first-ride-review/27398
- Now r15 v3 it has the race DNA and track ergonomics.Yamaha this time didnt compromise performance for looks as in a v2.Its the best in 150 cc segment..Rc 200 is a track oriented race machine if you are a beginner go for r15.rv is a great choice which can be compared to Apache rtr or cbr 350 or rr 310 from the.
- If you want more aggressive riding posture and you are corner enthusiastic then you should go for r15 v3 and you can also do weekend rides on it if you want want to go for long rides without taking many stops then rs200 is a good option
Q. Which one is better R15 v3 or KTM RC 200?
- We rode the new R15 v3.0 on both the racetrack and in the real world. While the R15 has grown larger and more powerful, it needs a certain level of expertise to tame. The more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, the RC 200 has set the bar quite high for the entry-level sports bike segment. The committed ergonomics might not be everyone’s cup of tea but if you are looking for cornering dynamics with an added dose of power but are on a budget, your search ends here.Read More: - 2017 KTM RC 200: First Ride Review In Images: https://www.zigwheels.com/gallery/bikesslideshow/2017-ktm-rc-200-first-ride-review-in-images/27324/1/1 - Yamaha R15 v3.0 Road Test Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/yamaha-r15-v30-road-test-review/30566/
- Both are best in there own ways.For RC 200:1)Engine is much better than R15 V3 2) Initial power is more3)Fuel Efficiency:35-45 km/L4) Maintenance cost is more comparing to V35)Top speed:138Km/H6)No vibration at all7) Excellent brightness for the both Dim & Highbeam For R15 V3:1) Fuel Efficiency:45-502) Maintenance cost is less3) Initial power is less comparing to Rc2004)Top speed: 160Km/H 5)Low brightness for the headlights
- RC 200 much better option than R15 V3 but only if you budget permits it provides an adjustable suspension with the very other body that can do well on track as well as on normal roads but if you are running short on budget then go for an 583 has optimum performance with in its budget.
Q. Suggest me a bike under 1.5 lakh I am 6 feet and I am collage boy.
View More Questions
- Bro close your eyes and go for R15 V3 Best performance with best mileage and low maintenance...and even it's looks are also amazing
- Always rs 200...u can compare ..RS 200 with other bikes...it have higher top speed..greater acceleration with dynamic looks
- Bro you can buy an duke 200 with the money than can be used to buy an rc 125
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
