KTM Duke 200 vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison
KTM Duke 200 vs Yamaha MT 15
KTM 200 Duke Price starts at Rs. 1.73 lakh which is Rs. 36,149 costlier than Yamaha MT 15 priced at Rs. 1.37 lakh. The claimed mileage for the KTM 200 Duke is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha MT 15 is 48.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM 200 Duke is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. KTM 200 Duke is available in 4 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 1 colours. 58% users have chosen KTM 200 Duke over Yamaha MT-15 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare KTM 200 Duke vs Yamaha MT 15 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
200 Duke vs MT-15 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | 200 Duke BS6 | MT-15 STD |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.73 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.37 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.2 (779 Ratings) |
4.3 (290 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 4.21s |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 19.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 |
| Bore | 72 mm | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 49 mm | 58.7 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital Ignition | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 11.6:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 4.21s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 17.99 s @ 113.74 kmpl |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 38.25 m, 3.92 secm |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ... | 63.43 m, 4.92 secm |
| Mileage (City) | ... | 48.58 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | ... | 52.02 kmph |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 45 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 12.08s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | WP-USD Ø 43 mm | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Split Steel Trellis Frame | Delta Box |
| Suspension-Rear | WP-Monoshock | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | 150.3 kg | ... |
| Length*Width*Height | 2050*730*810 | 2020*800*1070 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1367 mm | 1335 mm |
| Length | 2050 mm | 2020 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 170 mm | 155 mm |
| Height | 810 mm | 1070 mm |
| Seat Height | 810 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 730 mm | 800 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13.5 L | 10 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | 282 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | ... | ETZ-5 |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | |
| Distance to Empty | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ... | |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... |
News Updates on 200 Duke and MT-15
-
What Has KTM Changed On The BS6 200 Duke?Are there any other changes than what meets the eye?
Jan 30, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
Here’s What’s Different Between The Yamaha MT-15 BS6 & MT-15 BS4
Is it just a colour update or is there more to the BS6 MT-15 than meets the eye?
Mar 3, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
KTM’s Entire India Model Lineup Is Now BS6-compliant!
Seven new KTMs in one day!? Yes, you read that right
Jan 30, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
The Youngest Member of Yamaha’s Dark Side Has Just Been Updated
Yamaha has finally kitted its MT-125 naked with Variable Valve Actuation
Oct 17, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. WHICH IS BETTER, YAMAHA MT-15 OR PLUSAR NS 200?
- Ns 200 is a 200 cc segment bike.it has more power ful engine more than MT. if you are searching for a comfort,powerful bike both are good.MT is a 150 segment bike .both bikes are different in power. but in looks both are aggressive and muscular. comparitively MT 15 is more aggressive than NS 200.
- Mt15 - bulletproof reliability+ advanced features+satisfactory performance both for daily commute + long ride ....overall you don't have to worry about sudden breakdown or other sudden issuesNs200- very poor reliability+very less advanced features+little bit better performance than mt15 ,but overall a headache as quality is poor ,but till it is good it is more enjoyable ,but at the moment it creates problem it becomes a headache and junk in your garage
- Ns200 it might not have radical looks but it is less costly than mt both are pretty much same as for durability performance no doubt ns riding ergonomics ns for low traffic and highway mt for heavy traffic and city also ns with long wheelbase is more stable than mt
Q. Which is best MT-15 or Duke 125?
- According to your question ,MT 15 is more comfort with a power full engine.duke 125 is not bad ,it has 124 cc engine but it compitating with 150 cc bikes.both are good.
- Well looking at price point I would say duke 125 is worth it but if you are looking for power then definitely go for mt-15 . Even though mt-15 has bigger cc engine it can still provide 50 km mileage .Note : Does not know the mileage capabilities of duke 125.
- First thing both are quite overpriced for what they offer and there are lot other bikes that offer good performance at a better price looks aren't the only thing that matters prefer indian brands they offer better quality and at low cost
Q. I want to buy Yamaha MT-15. I love this bike so much but my family members including my mom(wearing saree) will sit on this bike is it a good option if not then which is the best option under 2 lakh?
View More Questions
- Both of those bikes mentioned by you have very less chance to come in India ,as Honda is busy with activas and After mt15's not so good business ,Yamaha might not take risk to introduce xsr155 in India
- If 1.8 lakh -1.9 lakh is your budget then the best choice you have is newly launched Gixxer 250 (naked version), it will fulfill your all requirements
- No it is not good at all for pillions , specially for moms.Pillion seat is very small and hard.Go for Fz25 or Apache rtr 200 4v
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
