Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ V3
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Price starts at Rs. 1.33 Lakh which is Rs. 30,522 costlier than base model of Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 1.02 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 2 different colours while Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 comes with 2 colours. 55% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS200 over Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ V3 Comparison
| Key Highlights | Pulsar NS200 | FZ-FI Version 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.33 Lakh | Rs. 1.02 Lakh |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine Displacement | 199.5 cc | 149 cc |
| Power | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm |
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ V3 Summary
| Specs | Pulsar NS200 BS6 | FZ-FI Version 3.0 BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.33 Lakh View On Road Price | Rs. 1.02 Lakh View On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.3 (2090 Ratings) |
4.2 (359 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSVI Compliant FI DTS-i Engine | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Max Power | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Insurance | Rs. 9,278 Pulsar NS200 Insurance | Rs. 6,624 FZ-FI Version 3.0 Insurance |
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Watch Videos of Pulsar NS200 and FZ-FI Version 3.0
Pulsar NS200 Alternatives
-
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
Rs. 1.27 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Apache 200 4V -
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Rs. 1.10 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Pulsar NS160
-
Yamaha MT 15
Rs. 1.39 LakhPulsar NS200 vs MT 15
-
KTM 200 Duke
Rs. 1.81 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Duke 200
-
Yamaha YZF R15 V3
Rs. 1.47 LakhPulsar NS200 vs R15 V3
-
Bajaj Pulsar RS200
Rs. 1.52 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Pulsar RS200
-
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
Rs. 1.25 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Pulsar 220 F
-
Bajaj Dominar 250
Rs. 1.67 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Dominar 250
-
Suzuki Intruder
Rs. 1.22 LakhPulsar NS200 vs Intruder
FZ-FI Version 3.0 Alternatives
-
Yamaha MT 15
Rs. 1.39 LakhFZ V3 vs MT 15
-
Honda Hornet 2.0
Rs. 1.28 LakhFZ V3 vs Hornet 2.0
-
TVS Apache RTR 160
Rs. 1.02 LakhFZ V3 vs Apache RTR 160
-
Yamaha FZS-FI V3
Rs. 1.07 LakhFZ V3 vs FZS-FI V3
-
Honda Unicorn
Rs. 95,738FZ V3 vs Unicorn
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Rs. 1.10 LakhFZ V3 vs Pulsar NS160
-
Bajaj Pulsar 150
Rs. 94,125FZ V3 vs Pulsar 150
-
Yamaha YZF R15 V3
Rs. 1.47 LakhFZ V3 vs R15 V3
-
Suzuki Gixxer
Rs. 1.14 LakhFZ V3 vs Gixxer
Sell Your Car in Best Price
Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection
COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process
News Updates on Pulsar NS200 and FZ-FI Version 3.0
-
Here’s What We Expect From Bajaj In 2021Dec 25, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha’s FZ Fi Bikes Now Come At A Slight PremiumNov 9, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Performance Pulsars Receive A Dash Of ColourOct 17, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Now, Buying A Yamaha Will Make Your Pocket Lighter Than BeforeMay 13, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
The Pulsar NS200’s New Colour Scheme Might Just Be Its Best One EverSep 21, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 Range Gets Recalled Over A Silly ErrorDec 18, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Bajaj’s Pulsar NS200 Is Now Fuel-injected And BS6-compliant!Apr 2, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Yamaha Rides In The BS6 FZ-Fi to IndiaNov 9, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
-
EXCLUSIVE: The Pulsar NS200 Is About To Become More PowerfulFeb 14, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
The BS6 Yamaha FZ V3 Makes Only 0.3PS More Power Than The 125cc Pulsar!Oct 15, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is the best bikes for slim guys under 2 lakh?
- As your question followed for mileage means you have to go with hero splendor..if it is also based for good driving experience means i suggest you honda:- unicorn/x-blade..
- I want to buy a bike budget 1.5 lakh daily travel to office around 50 km which bike i should buy height is 5.5 ft....and slim body. plzz sugest me.
- I suggest to purchase jawa forty two bike which is comfortable bike for long and daily ride also the height of bike is less , also the mileage is good
Q. Which one is better Pulsar NS200 or Tvs apache rtr 2004v?
- I have always been a fan of Pulsar Ns 200, but when it comes to Engine refinement and exhaust sound there is no comaprison to Apache rtr 200 4v. Now coming to Engine power, Ns has quite powerful output in terms of bhp which 23.7 in comparison to Apache mere 20.73 bhp. Also Ns has 0.3 Nm more torque than Apache.When it comes to long crusing over highways, Pulsar beats Apache at its peak with 6 gearbox as compared to Apache's 5 gearbox which helps Pulsar to attain top speed of around 145-150kmph. Both bikes have equal milegae output ie. Somewhere between 38-45kmpl (depends on how you drive)I just bought a New pulsar Ns 2019 Abs, clocked at around 178 kms and i guarantee you that i have never been more happier in my life.Only thing i miss in Pulsar 200Ns is Exhaust but seriously that is no big issue, you can install a much powerful exhaust (Akrapovic) which comes around 4000-6000 INR, and trust its the best exhaust avilable out there, put in some K&N air filters, use Motul Synthetic oil, install Hydraulic lever and you have got the Beast on two wheels. (These are the ideas from my Pulsar 200Ns, i assure you next time you see a Apache 200 rtr 4v on a highway, you are gonna pass it over like its a piece of cake on wheels😅 lol. Goodluck with your machine.
- Lot of people were asking this question. So I do little digging about this V4 engine. Whatever I will be now mentioning is compared to NS200.Apache V4 engine is known for fast riding, Better pick up and maximum torque, There will be also less engine noise.NS200 has Triple Spark Engine, It's India developed technology, It usse the fuel in three cycle not in two comparing to other bikes. This is the reason you will easily get 40-42KM/L on highway and above 35 in city. For me NS wins
- Both these bikes are best at their point NS 200 is more powerful , top end of the bike is awesome and liquid cooling is available, preferd towards tall riders Apache 200 is newly refined engine with sporty looks compared to ns 200 the looks of ns200 is outdated and is available in market since 6 years, Apache200 handling is better than ns 200 , exhaust note of Apache is amazing compared to ns200 cusioning of seats are better in Apache 200 , sporty DRLS, best for city riding, and about mileage,Apache also defeats ns200 in mileage company claims 44 kmpl for Apache and 35 kmpl for ns200 but rather it depends on riding bike I had achieved around 38-40 kmpl in city on my Apache Apache gets dual channel abs and slipper clutch
Q. Which one is best in ns200 or duke 200?
View More Questions
- Well this question will always remain in the minds of bike enthusiasts. Both bike have got same hearts but the file makes marginally higher power and with lesser weight it also is quicker between the two. Technology wise again Duke shines over NS. NS does outperforms Duke on the top speed battle but only on an open highway. But the best part where NS beats Duke is the city rides. Indian roads are full of people holes and the suspension setup on Duke is Rock hard designed for race track. So, there is a difficulty in choice. Even the spare parts for Duke are costly. My suggestion is NS. Why? Because, you spend less while you purchase, your after sale cost is less, you get a really good performer in this segment, of course you cannot beat file in a race, but how often are you going to race, you get softer suspension that is not harsh on your back yet gives you respectable handling. But if you can really afford some premium for better quality go for Duke.
- If you are looking to sprint around town and maybe even hit the track at times, Duke 200 is your best friend. However, it feels a little restless at times, nothing negative here, that is just how the motorcycle is, always eager to go. It gets better equipment, suspension, fatter tyres, bigger brakes, fuel injection and everything. But that adds almost 50K. And the gearing isn’t highway friendly. The 200 NS/AS will be better for going long distances. Acceleration is lower than Duke but still very good. Being a Bajaj, there could be some rattles here and there which you will have to deal with. You lose of stuff like USD forks, FI and all. But saving 50K over the Duke for close to similar performance, you can’t complain much. Also, if you have budget constraint go with Pulsar Ns200 which is around 50k cheaper than Duke.
- Hi NS200 gives 5 to 8 more km than duke and have more top end speed. Budget friendly too. Cons: more vibration’s then duke. And cheaper parts have to maintain lot.Duke200 has unique eye catchy design and undoubtably a Drag King and solid build.. you can get 35km approx. can rough use. minimum vibrations on top end.have to maintain chain regularly..Both have price difference. Choice is yours..I recommend Duke..