Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ V3 Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ V3
Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Price starts at Rs. 99,200 which is Rs. 99,200 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar NS200 priced at Rs. To Be Announced. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 7 different colours while Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 55% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS200 over Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar NS200 vs FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar NS200 ABS | FZ-Fi Version 3.0 STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.14 lakh | Rs. 99,200 |
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 23.5 PS @ 9500 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.86s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 36.1 kmpl | 50 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear:-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4 - stroke, SOHC 4-Valve, Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, BSIV Compliant DTS-i Engine | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 199.5 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 23.5 PS @ 9500 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 18.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | ... | 57.3 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 57.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | ... | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.86s | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 16.47m | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 39.7 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 36.1 kmpl | 50 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 12.58s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 16.47m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | Diamond |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear:-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2017*804*1075 | 1990*780*1080 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1363 mm | 1330 mm |
| Length | 2017 mm | 1990 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 169 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1075 mm | 1080 mm |
| Seat Height | ... | 790 mm |
| Width | 804 mm | 780 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12.8 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 300 mm | ... |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Sealed Type |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ... | Optional |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680 -
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakh
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is better Pulsar NS200 or Tvs apache rtr 2004v?
- I have always been a fan of Pulsar Ns 200, but when it comes to Engine refinement and exhaust sound there is no comaprison to Apache rtr 200 4v. Now coming to Engine power, Ns has quite powerful output in terms of bhp which 23.7 in comparison to Apache mere 20.73 bhp. Also Ns has 0.3 Nm more torque than Apache.When it comes to long crusing over highways, Pulsar beats Apache at its peak with 6 gearbox as compared to Apache's 5 gearbox which helps Pulsar to attain top speed of around 145-150kmph. Both bikes have equal milegae output ie. Somewhere between 38-45kmpl (depends on how you drive)I just bought a New pulsar Ns 2019 Abs, clocked at around 178 kms and i guarantee you that i have never been more happier in my life.Only thing i miss in Pulsar 200Ns is Exhaust but seriously that is no big issue, you can install a much powerful exhaust (Akrapovic) which comes around 4000-6000 INR, and trust its the best exhaust avilable out there, put in some K&N air filters, use Motul Synthetic oil, install Hydraulic lever and you have got the Beast on two wheels. (These are the ideas from my Pulsar 200Ns, i assure you next time you see a Apache 200 rtr 4v on a highway, you are gonna pass it over like its a piece of cake on wheels😅 lol. Goodluck with your machine.
- In our comparison test with the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V, the NS200 came across as a well-balanced package that’s ideal for your daily city runs, occasional highway cruising and even for some fun on the twisties. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 offers a lot more grunt, better-stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics in comparison to the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V. It also feels a lot more relaxed at high speeds. The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
- Pulsar NS200 falls in the price range of Rs. 1.0 to 1.11 lakh (Ex-showroom, Delhi). The naked street-fighter retains the single cylinder, liquid cooled, triple spark, 199.5cc DTS-i engine which generates 23.5PS of maximum power at 9500rpm and 18.3Nm of peak torque at 8000rpm. It comes with an option of single-channel ABS as well & has claimed mileage of 30kmpl with a top speed of 135kmph. To know more, click on the link: https://bit.ly/2oX2IeV On the other hand, Apache 200 4V priced between Rs. 96,000-1.09 lakh (Ex-showroom, Delhi). It is the new iteration of TVS's 200cc motercycle which is equipped with slipper clutch that reduces the clutch lever effort and its 197cc air and oil-cooled single cylinder motor comes in two variants: carburetted and fuel injected. The carburetted mill makes 20.5PS at 8500rpm while the fuel injected one makes a slightly higher 21PS at 8500rpm. In safety feature RTR 200 has optional dual channel ABS that reduces the breaking distance while improving the staibility. To churn out more, click on the link: https://bit.ly/2ruIPJp You can compare these two bikes on the following link: https://bit.ly/2pdyKl9
Q. Which one is best pulsar NS200 or R15 V3?
- Ns200 is a Naked bike and r15 is a Full faring bike it is up to you which type of bike you want ,r15 is a track oriented bike and its riding posture is not so comfortable, if you ride a bike for long distance then it is not preferable and ns is a street oriented bike whith great power , look wise both bike has different., power on the both bike is good ,. in R15 it is powerful bike in 150cc segment and Ns200 is also has great power in 200 cc segment with lower price.
- Yamaha YZF R15 V3's more committed ergonomics make for an uncomfortable ride in the city. If you are looking for a dynamically competent bike that you’d like to hone your riding skills on and don't mind the committed riding position, the Yamaha R15 v 3.0 is the one to go for. It's a bike we'd love to have in our garage but its ergonomics limit its practicality. That's the reason it can not be our primary everyday bike. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Do take a test ride in order to pick one.
- Well the r15 looks really cool,however its a 150 cc so it will perform well if a rider weighs 50-70 kgs above that the power to weight ratio will be reduced. Ns on the other hand loves to be revved & it performs really brutal & fast after 6k rpm & above. Alot more factors are there like city usage,weight,fuel efficiency etc. Both the bikes also get different riding position so the r15 is more track focused sorts & the NS is more of street/naked bike, Hence the purpose of bike usage & the weight determines alot to select a bike between r15 & ns200. Also what sushant commented is right the R15 is more refined though
Q. Pulsar 200ns or pulsar 220f, which one is best?
- Both machines are absolutely perfect for indian market. I personally like 200 Ns better than 220F but that's my preference of naked sports over fender bikes. But keep in mind pulsar 220 was fastest indian bike for straight few years and that is for a reason.
- Both bikes have there good quality. What is u r need and what is u r requirements. It's depends upon it. NS 200 has a ABS but it's a single channel. It has clock seating posture is good. Looking slightly hard seat. But 220 has no ABS no clock. Not so informative display. But it's looking really nice.. I think u should go with NS 200. It has high BHP than 220. Means high pick up. So go for it
- I would suggest you to go with NS because its new generation bike. 220F is very old model. It was first come to market in the year around 2008. Fi means it will not effect the mileage considering how you ride. However, NS has new technology called triple spark which enhance the fuel capacity and you can actually expect more mileage depending how you ride the bike?
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
