Honda XBlade vs Yamaha FZ V3 Comparison
Honda XBlade vs Yamaha FZ V3
Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Price starts at Rs. 99,200 which is Rs. 18,875 costlier than Honda XBlade priced at Rs. 80,325. The claimed mileage for the Honda XBlade is NA where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is NA. In technical specifications, Honda XBlade is powered by 162.71 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Honda XBlade is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 57% users have chosen Honda XBlade over Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Honda XBlade vs Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
XBlade vs FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | XBlade ABS | FZ-Fi Version 3.0 BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 89,136View On Road Price | Rs. 99,200View On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.2 (229 Ratings) |
4.2 (192 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 162.71 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.12 PS @ 8500 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.3s | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Insurance | Rs. 7,657XBlade Insurance | Rs. 6,549FZ-Fi Version 3.0 Insurance |
Engine
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 162.71 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.12 PS @ 8500 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 13.9 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 57.3 mm | 57.3 mm |
| Stroke | 63.096 mm | 57.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 10:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.3s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | 19.32 s @ 108.33 kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 25.62m | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 45.52m | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 17.79s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 25.62m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Diamond | Diamond |
| Suspension-Rear | Monoshock | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-80/100-17, Rear :- 130/70-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | ... |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2013*786*1115 | 1990*780*1080 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1347 mm | 1330 mm |
| Length | 2013 mm | 1990 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 160 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1115 mm | 1080 mm |
| Seat Height | ... | 790 mm |
| Width | 786 mm | 780 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12.8 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 276 mm | ... |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | ... |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Sealed Type |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ... | Optional |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Watch Videos of XBlade and FZ-Fi Version 3.0
News Updates on XBlade and FZ-Fi Version 3.0
-
Honda X-Blade ABS Launched At Rs 87,776Equipped with a single-channel ABS, the X-Blade ABS is priced at a premium of Rs 8,008 over the standard bike
Dec 7, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels -
2019 Yamaha FZ Fi ABS & FZS Fi ABS: Top 5 Things You Need To Know
From a new design to improved ergonomics, here’s everything that’s changed with the new FZ Fi 150 and FZS Fi 150
Jan 21, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?
HMSI feels there’s a lot of potential in the 160cc segment. In fact, they have three motorcycles in the category. Read on to find which one suits you!
May 28, 2018 | By Team ZigWheels -
More Aggressive Baby Yamaha FZ Version 3.0 Is Here
Features redesigned bodywork with LED headlamp, new instrument console and a slightly more powerful engine
Jan 21, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
-
FZ-Fi Version 3.0Rs. 99,200vsFZ-Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 160 4VApache RTR 160 4VRs. 1.01 lakh
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is the best xblade or hornet
- The Honda X-Blade shares its motor with the Hornet 160R. But the 162.71cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine puts out 14PS of power at 8500rpm and 13.9Nm of torque at 6000rpm, which is 1.5PS and 1Nm less than the Hornet 160R. The motor is mated to a 5-speed gearbox. The X-Blade looks a lot more appealing than the Hornet and the Unicorn 160. The only miss here then is the lack of any kind of braking aids. The stopping power on the bike, though, feels lacking. The brakes have decent bite but desperately lack feel. The CB Hornet 160R is for the discerning rider who is looking for a sporty and premium 160cc motorcycle that offers looks, more performance and better safety, thanks to the optional ABS. On the other hand, young riders who are under a strict budget may find the X-Blade alluring, thanks to the touring-friendly ergonomics and an aggressive design language. Read more: Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?- https://bit.ly/2L4dzuk
- The Honda X-Blade shares its motor with the Hornet 160R. But the 162.71cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine puts out 14PS of power at 8500rpm and 13.9Nm of torque at 6000rpm, which is 1.5PS and 1Nm less than the Hornet 160R. The motor is mated to a 5-speed gearbox. The X-Blade looks a lot more appealing than the Hornet and the Unicorn 160. The only miss here then is the lack of any kind of braking aids. The stopping power on the bike, though, feels lacking. The brakes have decent bite but desperately lack feel. The CB Hornet 160R is for the discerning rider who is looking for a sporty and premium 160cc motorcycle that offers looks, more performance and better safety, thanks to the optional ABS. On the other hand, young riders who are under a strict budget may find the X-Blade alluring, thanks to the touring-friendly ergonomics and an aggressive design language. Read more: Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?- https://bit.ly/2L4dzuk
- I have driven Trigger previously. I have driven Pulsar 180 also. Now, I own Honda XBlade. But both of Honda bikes.... I felt that these are ordinary bikes behind the garb of Honda. I would prefer Pulsar 180 bike most on point of power...pickup if selected out of these three bikes. But Pulsar 180 bike had one drawbacks like its handle felt heavy on drivers' shoulders.
Q. Should I buy Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 now or wait for the BS6 engine and how much the price will increase - FZ V3?
- The Bharat Stage 6 (BSVI) norm is the sixth mandate for vehicular emissions and a much welcome change amidst the rampant air pollution in India. NOx (Nitrogen Oxide) level will be brought down by a staggering 25% for Petrol Engines. So, if you can wait for BS6 engine than that would be a good option and if you need the bike now than you can go with BS4 model and that won't make much difference once BS6 engine is launched. Moreover, for the price, it would be difficult to give any verdict as BS6 complained engine for Yamaha FZ-Fi Version 3.0 is not launched yet. Stay tuned for further updates.
- If you want to enjoy riding right now than take Yamaha FZ fi v3 and forgot everything.You become peace of mind. No need to wait some other model's are engine type because westing your time.
- U have any changes graphics and console in bs6 yamaha fz
Q. What is different between FZ Fi V3 BS4 vs BS6, because I want buy a FZ bike?
View More Questions
- The Bharat Stage 6 (BSVI) norm is the sixth mandate for vehicular emissions and a much welcome change amidst the rampant air pollution in India. NOx (Nitrogen Oxide) level will be brought down by a staggering 25% for Petrol Engines. So, if you can wait for BS6 engine than that would be a good option and if you need the bike now than you can go with BS4 model and that won't make much difference once BS6 engine is launched.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
