Datsun GO 2018 vs Maruti Celerio Comparison
Datsun GO 2018 vs Maruti Celerio
Maruti Celerio LXI Price starts at Rs. 4.41 lakh which is Rs. 63,210 costlier than Datsun GO D Petrol priced at Rs. 3.78 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Datsun GO Petrol is 19.8 kmpl where as claimed mileage for Maruti Celerio Petrol is 23.1 kmpl. In technical specifications, Datsun GO D Petrol is powered by 1198 cc engine where as Maruti Celerio LXI is powered by 998 cc engine. 70% users have chosen Datsun GO over Maruti Suzuki Celerio in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Datsun GO vs Maruti Celerio on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Naturally Aspirated 12V DOHC EFI | K10B Engine |
| Engine Displacement | 1198 cc | 998 cc |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Power | 67bhp@5000rpm | 67.04bhp@6000rpm |
| Torque | 104Nm@4000rpm | 90Nm@3500rpm |
| No Of Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Transmission | Manual | Manual |
| Gear Box | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Paddle Shift | ||
| Kerb Weight | 819kg | 815kg |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ||
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 15.05 Seconds | |
| Quarter Mile | ||
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | ||
| Mileage (Overall) | ||
| Mileage (Highway) | ||
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 19.83 kmpl | 23.1 kmpl |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 150 |
Suspension
| Suspension Front | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut |
| Suspension Rear | Twist Beam | Coupled Torsion Beam |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 4.6 metres | 4.7 metres |
| Tyre Size | 165/70 R14 | 155/80 R13 |
| Wheel Size | 14 Inch | 13 Inch |
| Alloy Wheel Size | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless, Radial |
Interior
| Dual Tone Dashboard | ||
| Ventilated Seats | ||
| Additional Interior Features | All Black Instrument Panel, Carbon Fiber Interior Insters, Front Door With Map Pockets, Average Vehicle Speed, Front Room Lamp, Engine Running Time | Illumination Colour Amber, Urethene Steering Wheel |
| Fabric Upholstery | ||
| Leather Seats | ||
| Rear Seat Headrest | ||
| Front Shoulder Room | ||
| Rear Shoulder Room | ||
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Boot Space | 265 | 235-litres |
| Fuel Capacity | 35 Liters | 35 Liters |
Exterior
| Alloy Wheels | ||
| Lighting | ||
| Trunk Opener | Lever | Remote |
| Additional Exterior Features | Body Colored Bumpers, Front Intermittent Wiper, Hawk- Eye Headlamps | Body Coloured Bumper, Body Coloured Back Door Garnish, Grille Material, Outside Mirror Type Pivot |
| Outside Rear View Mirror | ||
| Turn indicators on ORVM | ||
| Xenon Headlights | ||
| Trunk Light | ||
| Rear Spoiler | ||
| Antenna | ||
| Roof Rails | ||
| Ground Clearance (Laden) | 180mm | |
| Length Width Height | 3788*1636*1507 | 3695*1600*1560 |
| Wheelbase | 2450mm | 2425mm |
| Ground Clearance (Unladen) | 165mm |
Comfort
| In Car Entertainment (Audio) | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Addtional Comfort Features | Full Floor Console | |
| USB Charger | Not Available | Not Available |
| Central Control Armrest | Not Available | Not Available |
| Tailgate Ajar | ||
| Gear Shift Indicator | ||
| Rear Curtain | Not Available | Not Available |
| Luggage Hook and Net | ||
| Battery Saver | ||
| Lane Change Indicator | ||
| Additional Entertainment Features | seven-inch display | |
| Smart Entry | ||
| Automatic Climate Control | ||
| Massage Seats | Not Available | Not Available |
| Memory Functions For Seat | Not Available | Not Available |
| One Touch Operating Power Windows | Not Available | Not Available |
| Autonomous Parking | Not Available | Not Available |
| Drive Modes | ||
| Internal Storage | ||
| No of Speakers | -1 | -1 |
| Rear Entertainment System | ||
| AC | ||
| Rear AC Ducts | ||
| Heater | ||
| Power Steering | ||
| Steering Column | ||
| Steering Mounted Audio Control | ||
| Cruise Control | ||
| Power Windows ( Front / Rear ) | Front | |
| Adjustable Driver Seat | ||
| Heated Seat Front | ||
| Heated Seats Rear | ||
| Adjustable Front Passenger Seat | ||
| Lumbar Support | ||
| Folding Rear Seat | Bench Folding | Bench Folding |
| Rear Seat Center Armrest | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Dual Trip Meter | ||
| Door and Trunk Ajar Warning | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Seat Belt Warning | ||
| Push Ignition | ||
| Music System | ||
| AM/FM Radio | ||
| USB Auxiliary Input | ||
| DVD Playback | ||
| Touch-screen Display | ||
| GPS Navigation System | ||
| Speakers Front | ||
| Speakers Rear | ||
| Automatic Head Lamps | ||
| Auto Rain Sensing Wipers | ||
| Follow me home headlamps | ||
| Adjustable Head Lights | ||
| Parking Sensors | Rear | Rear |
| Remote Operated Fuel Tank Lid | ||
| Front Cupholders | ||
| Door Pockets | Front Door | Front & Rear Door |
| 12V Power Outlets | ||
| Cigarette Lighter | ||
| Bottle Holder | Front Door | Front & Rear Door |
| Sun Roof | ||
| Moon Roof |
Safety
| Anti-Pinch Power Windows | -1 | -1 |
| Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock | ||
| Knee Airbags | ||
| ISOFIX Child Seat Mounts | ||
| Head-Up Display | ||
| Day/Night Rearview Mirror | ||
| Pretensioners and Force Limiter Seatbelt | ||
| Blind Spot Monitor | ||
| Hill Descent Control | ||
| Hill Assist | ||
| Impact Sensing Auto Door Unlock | ||
| 360 View Camera | ||
| Airbags | Driver and Passenger | Driver |
| Seat Belts | ||
| Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) | ||
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) | ||
| Brake Assist (BA) | ||
| Electronic Stability Program (ESP) | ||
| Traction Control System (TCS) | ||
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Central Locking | ||
| Child Safety Lock | ||
| Fog Lamps (Front / Rear ) | ||
| Rear Wash Wiper | ||
| Rear Defogger |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is better among Datson Go T model, Celerio and Hyundai Santro?
- I have not driven the santro and celerio bUt the engine of Datsun go is well proven to be powerful and reliable than other two.Nissan is a class car maker.
- As I said in my earlier response, Datsun is best if you are not a'suzuki'obsessed person.
- Datson Go T
Q. Which is one better between Celerio and Wagon R?
- The Celerio, though being the first car to introduce Indians to the concept of affordable automatic cars, has not been able to attract enough people, thanks to tough competition from better looking, better-equipped cars, priced lower and higher than it. It is not a bad car per se, but the multitude of options in the market don't help it stand out. On the other hand, If you are the practical kind and want sheer utility from your next hatchback, the WagonR fits the bill nicely. The Wagon R might not be the best looking or have all the bells and whistles, but it is a practical hatch in every sense of the word. It is spacious, fuel efficient and has Maruti Suzuki’s dependable after sales network to back it up.We would suggest you to take a test drive in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/dealers
- Here, Wagon R 2019 would be a better pick. The Wagon R might not be the best looking or have all the bells and whistles, but it is a practical hatch in every sense of the word. It is spacious, fuel efficient and has Maruti Suzuki’s dependable after sales network to back it up. The WagonR gives importance to practicality over style, function over form. The new WagonR blends the strengths of the older versions with some new ones. Looks like it’s going to be easy for Maruti Suzuki to hold on to the number one spot in the segment.Read More: - 2019 Maruti Suzuki Wagon R: What We Like And What We Don’t: https://www.zigwheels.com/news-features/news/2019-maruti-suzuki-wagon-r-what-we-like-and-what-we-dont/32862/
- Celerio for city wagor r for city ad well as straight .highways .celerio vibration and bad voice insulation makes it a high way hater.but revs good in city. wagon r fails in curves better in straight higheways sn all rounder.
Q. Which is best betweenn Swift and Celerio?
- Hi, celerio is my companion mostly to commute in uber and Ola.Most prefer celerio for OLA cab.yes its per fect low torque ride in city is excellent. Most ste CNGs so lack boot.But for one or two it is enough.pros -low engine nice,good a/crystal clear glasses,good leg space.cons-poor plastictaxi celerio lack safety features.At least they could have given central locking.No stereo. cng lacks power.,but better than i10and Xents which is not factory fitted.overall good for daily commute ,not many issues,with full tank CNGit can run 300kms!can change to petrol mode on the go.I have been on one diesel which ran 80000 (discontinued now)in excellent condition.Service-matuti nowadays ignores customers ad their volume is so high,oops.Thanks. ,
- Swift , since its bigger and better than celerio in many ways, but if you want an easy to go and simple to drive, less stress, then just go for celerio with AGS gear box, hands down. but that automatic gear box needs some getting used to.
- In case if you like both these models streamline your decision in terms of budget . If budget is also not a constraint streamline your decision in terms of size of the car because Swift is bigger than Celerio and accommodating three rear passengers for long highway trips won’t be a hassle . Other decision making criterias are performance , safety features, comfort & convenience.