×

Honda Hornet 2.0 vs TVS Apache 160 4V

Honda Hornet 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.32 Lakh which is Rs. 16,973 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced at Rs. 1.15 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by 184.4 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Honda Hornet 2.0 is available in 5 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 4 colours. 54% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 4V over Honda Hornet 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

Honda Hornet 2.0 vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Hornet 2.0 Apache RTR 160 4V Apache RTR 180
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.32 Lakh Rs. 1.15 Lakh Rs. 1.14 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 184.4 cc 159.7 cc 177.4 cc
Power 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm 17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm 16.79 PS @ 8500 rpm
Read More

Honda Hornet 2.0 vs TVS Apache 160 4V Summary

Basic Info Hornet 2.0 STDApache RTR 160 4V Front Disc, Rear DrumApache RTR 180 BS6
Brand Honda TVS TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.32 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.15 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.14 Lakh View On Road Price
Rating
4.1
(231 Ratings)
4.1
(2295 Ratings)
4.2
(1215 Ratings)
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine, BS-VI SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, Fuel injected
Max Power 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm 17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm 16.79 PS @ 8500 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol Petrol
Colors
Hornet 2.0 Colors
Apache RTR 160 4V Colors
Apache RTR 180 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 8,672 Hornet 2.0 Insurance Rs. 8,976 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance Rs. 9,180 Apache RTR 180 Insurance

Engine Type
4 Stroke, SI Engine, BS-VI
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, Fuel injected
Engine Displacement
184.4 cc
159.7 cc
177.4 cc
Max Power
17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm
17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm
16.79 PS @ 8500 rpm
Max Torque
16.1 Nm @ 6000 rpm
14.73 Nm @ 7250 rpm
15.5 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6
bs6
bs6
Bore
61 mm
62 mm
...
Stroke
63.09 mm
52.9 mm
...
No Of Cylinders
...
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
4
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0:1
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc

Quarter Mile
18.87sec @ 107.68kmph
...
...
Braking (60-0 kmph)
19.67m
...
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
34.91m
...
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
55.11m
...
...
Mileage (City)
57.35 kmpl
...
...
Mileage (Highway)
55.77 kmpl
...
...
Braking 60-0 km/h
19.67m
...
...

Suspension-Front
Upside down Fork
Telescopic Forks
Telescopic Forks
Chassis
Diamond Type
Double cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Double Cradle Synchro STIFF
Suspension-Rear
Monoshock
Mono Shock
Monotube Inverted Gas-filled shox (MIG) with spring aid

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy
Alloy

Length*Width*Height
2047*783*1064 mm^3
2035*790*1050 mm^3
2085*730*1105 mm^3
Wheelbase
1355 mm
1357 mm
1326 mm
Length
2047 mm
2035 mm
2085 mm
Ground Clearance
167 mm
180 mm
170 mm
Width
783 mm
790 mm
730 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
12 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
142 Kg
145 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
276 mm
...
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
...
200 mm

Battery Type
...
Maintenance Free
Maintenance Free
Charging at Home
...
Charging at Charging Station
...
Pilot Lamps
...
...
LED tail lights
X-Shaped LED
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED
Bulb

ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Single
Pass Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
...
...
Analogue
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Console
Digital
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
...
...
DRLs
...
...

Pros and Cons

  • Pros
  • Cons

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

  • Great ride quality and handling dynamics
  • performance-packed engine
  • feature-rich instrument console

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

  • Brakes lack bite
  • rear tyre is a bit skinny compared to rivals
Image

Do you own a Car or a
Bike?

  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor

Hornet 2.0 and Apache RTR 160 4V Competitors

News Updates on Hornet 2.0 and Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best bike compared with Honda Hornet, TVS Apache RTR 160 4v, Yamaha FZ S 3.0 in mileage, pickup, comfort, price, service and spares?
  • If we compare Fi version of all bike then i think pickup of TVS Apache will be more, according to mileage 1st will be Hornet then Yamaha and then Apache but the difference will be only 4-5 kms.If we come to comfort i own Apache and i didnt find any problem with comfort, and for pricing you should contact dealers in the city.
  • Need comment on Suzuki introduer B6 vs Appache RTR160 4V for maintenance free spares avilable, comfort and safety. looking for my colleage going son. pl suggest
  • FZ-S Fi V3 for sure will give you the best mileage amongst these three. Riding comfort too unbeatable of FZ-S fi V3...
View All Answers
Q. I am confused between TVS Apache RTR 160 4V and Yamaha FZ S V3 under 1.20 lakh. Please suggest me one. Their is a saying the brakes of Yamaha FZ S V3 are not up to mark. What is the reality - Gixxer 2019?
  • Even I too thought of choosing Apache only, but cost wise not that much diff bro.. only very less price diff, but durable is Yamaha only , even after 5 years of riding Yamaha bikes, it won't go down and won't get vibration and all, but Apache and pulsar will give more vibration.. I was having TVS bike oly before my Yamaha FZ-S V3.. performance also fine only...Before going with Yamaha FZ-S V3, I have checked a list of bikes like RE Thunderbird, RE Bullet classic, Apache 160v4, Apache 200, Yamaha FZ-S v2 and V3, Bajaj Pulsar 160, even Honda Hornet also I have tried. Decided Yamaha FZ-S V3 finally.. took around an year (From Jan 2019 till Nov 23, 2019) ... 😄😄Moreover Apache is Indian made so cost must be lesser than Yamaha which is getting imported and tax duties must be high.. I didn't meant to say Indian bikes are cheaper and Yamaha is good bcos of Foreign made.. but it's a fact... If you consider there is some value for engine and durability of it, go for Yamaha or else Honda bikes than TVS and Bajaj bikes... 😊
  • TVS APACHE 160 4V IS BEST
  • Agreed
Q. Which will be better between Apache RTR 160 4V or Fz-fi(3.0) in terms of build quality, mileage and performance?
  • Mileage is better in fz it comes upto 55 kmpl and has a very stable control where as Apache is not worth for ita price ... In today's time people prefer mileage over power yes fz is under power but not disappointing. So my choice will always be fz
  • Both bikes are made of fibre...and in both milage and performance apache is better
  • Apache
View All Answers
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
  • Commuters
Compare Bikes