Bajaj Dominar 400 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Comparison
Bajaj Dominar 400 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200
Bajaj Dominar 400 Price starts at Rs. 1.90 lakh which is Rs. 48,069 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 priced at Rs. 1.42 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Dominar 400 is 25.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Dominar 400 is powered by 373.3 cc engine where as Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. Bajaj Dominar 400 is available in 1 different colours while Bajaj Pulsar RS200 comes with 7 colours. 52% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar RS200 over Bajaj Dominar 400 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Dominar 400 vs Bajaj Pulsar RS200 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Dominar 400 vs Pulsar RS200 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Dominar 400 STD | Pulsar RS200 Dual ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.90 lakh | Rs. 1.43 lakh |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, DOHC, 4 Valve, Liquid-cooled, Triple Spark, FI | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 40 PS @ 8650 rpm | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.0s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 35 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, DOHC, 4 Valve, Liquid-cooled, Triple Spark, FI | Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 373.3 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 40 PS @ 8650 rpm | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 35 Nm @ 7000 rpm | 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 89 mm | ... |
| Stroke | 60 mm | ... |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 11.2:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 3.0s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | 15.53 sec @ 134.48 kmph | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 17.38m | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 31.36m | ... |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 49.42m | ... |
| Mileage (City) | 25.59 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 32.29 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 35 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 7.1s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 17.38m | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | USD Telescopic Forks | Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush |
| Chassis | Beam type perimeter frame | Perimeter Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Multi-step adjustable Mono shock with Nitrox | Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2156*836*1112 | 1999*765*1114 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1453 mm | 1345 mm |
| Length | 2156 mm | 1999 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 157 mm | 157 mm |
| Height | 1112 mm | 1114 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | 800 mm |
| Width | 836 mm | 765 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 13 L | 13 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 320 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | VRLA | DC MF |
| Pilot Lamps | LED Pilot Lamps | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
Features
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes | Sports Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Split | Split |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | ... | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ... | Dual Projector |
| Cooling System | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ... | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | ... | 24000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is best pulsar ns200 or rs200?
- The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
- The Pulsar RS200 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Chakan-based manufacturer. It is a well-rounded package with a good balance of performance and handling without compromising on comfort. What sweetens the deal further is the added safety net of ABS, the fresh design update, and the competitive pricing. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2zT6uqV
- RS 200 makes very high frequency vibration but it looks super. RS 200's engine is better than NS200 . I'm don't recommend to buy NS or RS. If your budget is low than you can buy it. I'm recommend to buy Duke 200 or Dominar 400 Both are best for tour and very comfortable. Upgrade your budget up-to 2lacks and buy DUKE 200 or DOMINAR 400
Q. Which is more attractive, comfortable and afforable for daily use?? Pulsar RS200 or ROYAL ENFIELD classic 350??
- Both the segments are different don't go on Engine Capacity. RS200 is designed for performing well on both race track and for daily commute. RE classic 350 is a tourer/cruiser which has a steady pickup.
- Why do people always compare two different kinda bikes !?? ...don't compare sports bike with re classic 350 !! sports are meant for speed n power !! if you are a re lover go for it ...when it comes to speed , performance , comfortable long rides , maintenance , daily use go for rs200 !! decent mileage and performance !!
- Enfield is more comfortable and it depends on the person on attractive perspectives and Enfield is more comfortable for daily ise
Q. Which one is better Dominar 400 or RE Himalayan?
- 2019 Dominar 400 ofcourse because RE only focus on heavy engines and they provide only air cooled engines and they don't make bikes with lots of features in this era.Buy a dominar and live like you are in 2020 in real .
- I would go with dominor 400... you will get a lot of additional features, speed,power and look compared to Himalayan. Though it is not suitable for off-roadings.
- For a better tank range you can go with himalayan but for better maintenance cost and good torque you can go with dominar
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
