Honda Unicorn 160 vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison
Honda Unicorn 160 vs TVS Apache 160 4V
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Price starts at Rs. 92,306 which is Rs. 16,422 costlier than Honda CB Unicorn 160 priced at Rs. 75,884. The claimed mileage for the Honda CB Unicorn 160 is 62 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is 50.9 kmpl. In technical specifications, Honda CB Unicorn 160 is powered by 162.71 cc engine where as TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Honda CB Unicorn 160 is available in 6 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 8 colours. 61% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 4V over Honda CB Unicorn 160 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Air-cooled, 4 stroke, SI engine | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 162.71 cc | 159.7 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.01 PS @ 8000 rpm | 16.5 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 13.92 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 14.8 Nm @ 6500 rpm |
| Bore | 57.3 mm | 62 mm |
| Stroke | 63 mm | 52.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Digital CDI | |
| Compression Ratio | 10:01 | |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 4.82s | 5.04s |
| Quarter Mile | 19.23 s @ 106.1 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 22.20m | |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 41.51m | |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | 50.94 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 56.1 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | 50 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 62 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 15.36s | |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 22.20m |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic Forks |
| Chassis | Diamond | Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF |
| Suspension-Rear | Spring Loaded Hydraulic (Mono Shock) | Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-80/100-17, Rear :-110/80-17 | Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 25 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 2045*757*1062 | 2050*790*1050 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1324 mm | 1357 mm |
| Length | 2045 mm | 2050 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 150 mm | 180 mm |
| Height | 1062 mm | 1050 mm |
| Seat Height | 800 mm | |
| Width | 757 mm | 790 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 270 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 130 mm | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | LED Pilot Lamps | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | no | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Commuter Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes, Commuter Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | Single Piece | |
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | Yes | |
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Oil Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | ||
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 24000 |
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
Apache RTR 160 4VRs. 92,306vsApache RTR 160 4V vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which bike is more comfortable - TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or Honda CB Unicorn 160
- Honda unicorn 160 best bike. And comfortable.
- Go for One & only HONDA
- Unicorn 160cc
Q. Which is the best Apache 160 4v or pulsar ns 160?
- The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features and a price tag that starts at Rs 81,490 (ex-showroom for carb, single-disc variant). However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- The Pulsar NS 160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling, save for refinement. The new NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hnad, if a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features. However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India. We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
Q. Which is best apache 160 4V or FZ S FI 2.0?
- Here, TVS Apache RTR 160 4v would be a better pick. If a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. Thankfully, the Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features at its price. However, it doesn’t feel as confident under hard braking as the Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Honda Hornet. That said, the Apache RTR 160 4V is not only the most refined RTR we have ridden till date but also one of the most refined 160cc motorcycles to be ever produced in India.Read More: - TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: First Ride Review: https://www.zigwheels.com/reviews-advice/reviews/tvs-apache-rtr-160-4v-first-ride-review/30013
- If a bike has to survive in the cut-throat 160cc two-wheeler segment, it needs to be competitively priced and pack enough performance to keep riders happy. In this case, Apache RTR 160 4V delivers well on both fronts with class leading features. On the other hand, the second generation FZ-Fi already feels dated. It is the least powerful bike here though it can still hold a candle when it comes to dynamics. It though is in desperate need of an upgrade - both in terms of styling and performance. Out of the two, we would suggest you to pick for Apache 160 4V.
- Fzs is more reliable for longer rides as it gives more comfortable riding position.. Apache on the other side gives more aggressive riding position which makes it difficult to go for longer rides. Otherwise both bikes are good. I find Yamaha more reliable because she never gave me any problem and she is fun to ride.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
