Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.87 Lakh which is Rs. 51,704 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 priced at Rs. 1.36 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is 40.36 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Classic 350 is 41.55 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Classic 350 is powered by 349 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 4 different colours while Royal Enfield Classic 350 comes with 7 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar NS200 vs Classic 350

Key Highlights Pulsar NS200 Single ChannelClassic 350 Redditch
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4-value FI 6-Speed Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-oil Cooled
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm

Pulsar NS200 vs Classic 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Single ChannelRoyal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch
Rating
1078 reviews
1104 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.36 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.87 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4-value FI 6-Speed Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-oil Cooled
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Colors
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-482.6 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 4,057 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 5,400 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,972 Pulsar NS200 Insurance Rs. 11,842 Classic 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
3 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
4
2
Claimed Top Speed
136 kmph
120 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, 4-value FI 6-Speed Engine
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
349 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
72 mm
72 mm
Stroke
49 mm
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI)
Compression Ratio
11+/-0.5:1
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
40.36 kmpl
41.55 kmpl

Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
...
90 mm
Suspension-Front
Upside Down Forks
Telescopic, 41 mm Forks, Travel - 130 mm
Suspension-Rear
Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber With Canister
Twin Tube Emulsion Shock Absorbers With 6 Step Adjustable Preload, Travel - 90 mm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
36 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/90-19, , Rear :-120/80-18
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-482.6 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
805 mm
805 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2 L
2.6 L
Gross Weight
...
375 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
...
2.75 L
Length*Width*Height
2017*804*1075 mm3
2145*785*1090 mm3
Wheelbase
1363 mm
1390 mm
Length
2017 mm
2145 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
170 mm
Height
1075 mm
1090 mm
Width
804 mm
785 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
12 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
158 Kg
195 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
270 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
...
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 8AH
Projector head light
...

Frame Type
Pressed Steel Perimeter Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Real Time Mileage Indicator
...
Vehicle Location Tracking
...
Pillion Seat
...
Pillion Grab Rail
...
Calls and Messaging
...
Navigation assist
Riding Modes
Rain,Road,Off-Road
...
Low battery alert
Brightness Control
...
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
...
Rear Footpegs
Daytime Running Lamps
Gear Position Indicator
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
...
ABS Type
Single Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
...
Side Stand Warning
Exhaust Heat Shield
...
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
Digital
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
...
15000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
  • Sporty handling characteristics
  • The 6-speed gearbox proves advantageous on the highway
  • Commendable performance considering the price point
Royal Enfield Classic 350
  • Timeless classic-retro design
  • J-series engine is smooth and effortless to ride
  • Neutral and relaxed riding posture
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
  • Design looks dated now
  • Lacks adequate features and the absence of dual-channel ABS is a miss
Royal Enfield Classic 350
  • Could get more features
  • Braking could improve
  • Rider footpegs are not well-positioned as they can foul with your shins when crawling through bumper-to-bumper traffic with your feet down

Is Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Better Than Royal Enfield Classic 350?

60% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS200 over Royal Enfield Classic 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 6550 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Classic 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, maintenance and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Classic 350 is better on the grounds of comfort. On the basis of mileage user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Classic 350 Pulsar NS200
Mileage 3.9 3.9
Performance 4.6 4.5
Comfort 4.3 4.5
Maintenance 4.0 3.9
Features 4.5 4.2
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Classic 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best, Royal Enfield Classic 350 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Ktm duke 200
  • Both the bikes are good in their own forte. Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a great bike in fact that RE engineers and designers have maintained the charming DNA of its predecessor but without the niggles. It was very easy for the brand to overdo the iconic Classic 350, but they have managed to find the right balance and the updates have been done only where required. On the other hand, the design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which one is good to buy, Royal Enfield Classic 350 or Honda H'ness CB350?
  • Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a great bike in fact that RE engineers and designers have maintained the charming DNA of its predecessor but without the niggles. It was very easy for the brand to overdo the iconic Classic 350, but they have managed to find the right balance and the updates have been done only where required. On the other hand, The Honda CB350 is a great option for someone looking for a retro-styled motorcycle with sprightly performance and the legendary reliability of Honda is an additional bonus. So if you’re looking for the above, the CB350 makes better sense. One thing that goes against the Japanese bike is Honda’s strategy of selling it from the Big Wing dealerships only which restricts access to many buyers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. The Honda CB350 is an impressive bike, but it lacks a bit of soul and character, something that can't be quantified - and something which the Classic 350 has in abundance. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Classic 350 or Meteor 350?
  • Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a great bike in fact that RE engineers and designers have maintained the charming DNA of its predecessor but without the niggles. It was very easy for the brand to overdo the iconic Classic 350, but they have managed to find the right balance and the updates have been done only where required. On the other hand, the new J Platform motor is a clear step change from the UCE, making the Meteor 350 a far more well-rounded motorcycle than any of the previous 350s. It’s not just the engine, the gearbox feels more grown up too and the bike handles itself and its weight rather well. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Community

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, maintenance and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Classic 350 is better on the grounds of comfort. On the basis of mileage user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Classic 350 by ₹51,704.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350?
For the Single Channel version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS200 produces 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm of power and 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Redditch version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Classic 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Classic 350 and Bajaj Pulsar NS200

Which one do you like more?
Classic 350
Classic 350
Pulsar NS200
Pulsar NS200
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350
×