Suzuki 2019 Gixxer SF vs Yamaha FZS V3 Comparison
Suzuki 2019 Gixxer SF vs Yamaha FZS V3
Suzuki Gixxer SF Price starts at Rs. 1.10 lakh which is Rs. 11,190 costlier than Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 98,680. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Gixxer SF is 51 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by 155 cc engine where as Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 comes with 1 colours. 69% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF over Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Gixxer SF vs Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Gixxer SF vs FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Gixxer SF MotoGP Edition | FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 STD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.11 lakh | Rs. 98,680 |
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 155 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.21s | 5.97s |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 50 kmpl |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 155 cc | 149 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 14.1 PS @ 8000 rpm | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 |
| Bore | 56 mm | 57.3 mm |
| Stroke | 62.9 mm | 57.9 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ... | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 9.5:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.21s | 5.97s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 20.35 sec @ 100.37 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 17.20m | 20.48 mm |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 34.82m | 36.44 mm |
| Mileage (City) | 51 kmpl | 49.31 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | 62.47 kmpl | 55.42 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | 48 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ... | 50 kmpl |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 17.56s | 20.10s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 17.20m | 20.48 mm |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic, Coil spring, Oil damped | Telescopic |
| Chassis | ... | Diamond |
| Suspension-Rear | Swing Arm Type, Mono Suspension | Swingram |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-R17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Cast | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | 28 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2025*715*1035 | 1990*780*1080 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1340 mm | 1330 mm |
| Length | 2025 mm | 1990 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 165 mm |
| Height | 1035 mm | 1080 mm |
| Seat Height | 795 mm | 790 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 780 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12.8 L |
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | Maintenance Free |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stepup Seat | ... | |
| Low Oil Indicator | ... | |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Underseat storage | ... | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | 2 |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680vsFZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 160 4VApache RTR 160 4VRs. 92,306 -
FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680vsFZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Apache RTR 200 4V Race Edition 2.0Rs. 1.12 lakh
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Is Suzuki Gixxer SF is a good choice over Yamaha FZ V3? (in terms of touring purpose)
- Gixxer is with Fairing and FZ is without Fairing. I prefer FZ because of the lightness and ride-ability in city. If you travel longer, then a fairing and the added weight makes more sense. it can take away slight wind buffeting fatigue when you travel long. Gixxer is also more powerful than FZ but with the added weight of the fairing and with slight loss in flexibility compared to the other.better to take a test drive of both.
- Yamaha FZ-S Fi V3 is a naked-sport bike which is good for daily city commutes occasional touring whereas Suzuki Gixxer SF is a sports bike which is a different segment. Gixxer SF is more suitable for long tour purposes. Yamaha FZ-S Fi V3 has a claimed fuel efficiency of 45 km/l and for Gixxer SF it is 48.5km/l. For better knowledge about ride quality and performance, we'd recommend taking a test ride. Follow the link below to see the dealerships available: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- Yes obviously, as you can sit on it both sportingly/comfortably
Q. Hey need your suggestion. Which bike is better between FZ-s Fi v3 and gixxer 150 SF in terms of engine, mileage and confort for daily use?
- I think Gixxer SF as it also comes with clock and gear shift indicator. Milage is also gud, I got around 55-56 kmpl before 1st servicing. Though I rode below 65 kmph. Its very comfortable to ride without any stress on your body. The best part is the driver seat. Its very well cushioned. We can easily travel long distance without any stops. I personally don't like the mate finish of Yamaha FZS v3.
- Of curse gixxer sf milege yaar 48 to 53 according to ride 75 to 95 if you going to above then you will get mileage 42 only but in this case you ride Yamaha bike give 35 mileage so you can know
- Suzuki gixxer sf because fz new one isn't compatible to gixxer
Q. What is the mileage of Gixxer SF 155? Which bike is good for daily city riding condition Gixxer SF 155 or Yamaha FZ S V3.0?
- I got around 55-56 kmpl before 1st servicing. Though I rode below 65 kmph. Its very comfortable to ride without any stress on your body. The best part is the driver seat. Its very well cushioned. We can easily travel long distance without any stops. City ride is also very comfortable. Gixxer SF also comes with clock and gear shift indicator. I personally don't like the mate finish of Yamaha FZS v3.
- Suzuki Gixxer SF hasn't gone through the mileage test yet. Moreover, SF gets an aggressive riding posture with a more committed riding ergonomics, therefore, it might provide a bit of uncomfortable in the city traffic whereas the FZ S FI gets an upright riding ergonomics which makes it a better option in terms of comfort. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride of both the bikes so that you get acquainted with the comfort, build quality, features and ride quality of the bikes.Click here for the Dealerships: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- 45 above any conditions
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
