×

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio vs TVS Apache 160 4V

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.07 Lakh which is Rs. 19,149 costlier than base model of NDS ECO MOTORS Lio priced at Rs. 88,166. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, NDS ECO MOTORS Lio is powered by engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. NDS ECO MOTORS Lio is available in 7 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 3 colours. The Comparison NDS ECO MOTORS Lio vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Lio Apache RTR 160 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 88,166 Rs. 1.07 Lakh
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Engine Displacement ... 159.7 cc
Power ... 17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio vs TVS Apache 160 4V Summary

Specs Lio STDApache RTR 160 4V Drum
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 88,166 View On Road Price Rs. 1.07 Lakh View On Road Price
Rating
nan
(0 Ratings)
4.1
(1897 Ratings)
Engine Type ... SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled
Max Power ... 17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Brakes Front Disc Drum
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Range 83 km/charge ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. To Be Announced Lio Insurance Rs. 8,843 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance

Engine Type
...
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled
Engine Displacement
...
159.7 cc
Max Power
...
17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm
Max Torque
152.78 Nm @ 100 rpm
14.73 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6
Bore
...
62 mm
Stroke
...
52.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
4
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
...
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
...
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Drum
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Quarter Mile
...
20.40 s @ 98.91 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
22.77m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
42.63m
Mileage (City)
...
54.78 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
49.57 kmpl
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
22.77m

Suspension-Front
...
Telescopic Forks
Chassis
...
Double cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Suspension-Rear
...
Mono Shock

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-12, Rear :-90/90-12
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Length*Width*Height
...
2035*790*1050 mm^3
Wheelbase
1460 mm
1357 mm
Length
2020 mm
2035 mm
Ground Clearance
...
180 mm
Width
730 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
90 Kg
145 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Rear Brake Diameter
...
130 mm

Battery Type
Lithium Ion
Maintenance Free
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Motor Power
1600 W
...
Battery Charging Time
4 hours
...
Range
83 km/charge
...
Range (Eco Mode)
125 km/charge
...
Range (Normal Mode)
100 km/charge
...
Pilot Lamps
...
LED Pilot Lamps
Range (Sport Mode)
83 km/charge
...
LED tail lights
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Cruise Control
...
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Charging point
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
...
Oil Cooled
Console
Digital
Digital
Odometer
...
Digital
EBS
...

Lio Alternatives

Apache RTR 160 4V Alternatives

Gaad-Store
Sell Your Car in Best Price

Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

News Updates on Lio and Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best bike compared with Honda Hornet, TVS Apache RTR 160 4v, Yamaha FZ S 3.0 in mileage, pickup, comfort, price, service and spares?
  • If we compare Fi version of all bike then i think pickup of TVS Apache will be more, according to mileage 1st will be Hornet then Yamaha and then Apache but the difference will be only 4-5 kms.If we come to comfort i own Apache and i didnt find any problem with comfort, and for pricing you should contact dealers in the city.
  • Need comment on Suzuki introduer B6 vs Appache RTR160 4V for maintenance free spares avilable, comfort and safety. looking for my colleage going son. pl suggest
  • I have carb. version of apache its good that your bike is giving such a mileage.
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better Apache RTR 200 4V or Apache RTR 160 4V
  • Obviously RTR 200 4V is better bike among these two because of reasons given below1.Styling :- RTR 160 4V is Downscaled Version of RTR 200 so looks are subjective this statement is not applicable here And if you will look in pictures RTR 160 4V will look equally good but in real life the difference is apparent in RTR 200 it looks wider and musculer and has splitted seats and gold coloured front forks which stands it out from the commuter crowd.2.Performance :- here also RTR 160 4V can't even stand a chance and there is no argument that RTR 200 4V is sportier bike and it is faster by a big margin whether it is acceleration or top speed RTR 200 will always ho faster and will give you more adrenaline rush.3.Mileage :- mileage is slightly better on RTR 160 4V but it is not a big difference, only 5 kmpl will be lesser on RTR 200 4V in normal riding condition RTR 200 4V gives a mileage of 37-40 and RTR 160 4V gives a mileage of 42-45 but if you are a hardcore rider and if you will ride your bike mostly on highways and if you will ride your bike on speeds like 100 and 110 then RTR 200 4V will give you more mileage because as a 160 cc bike it will be the top end for RTR 160 4V and as my friend told and as i have saw it on youtube milage goes down to 32-35 kmpl and for RTR 200 that speeds are normal because it is 200 cc bike and it is easier for a 200 cc engine to maintain 100 kmph constant speed and it will give normal mileage under these conditions4.handling :- Here also RTR 200 4V's Handling is better than RTR 160 4V's handling because RTR 160 4V has Wide Handlebar and RTR 200 4V has Clip on handlebar and clip on handlebars are known for their sporty handling so if you like cornering so much than RTR 200 is the perfect bike as it also offers you super stickey and grippy Pirelli tyres which are absent on RTR 160 4V5.Comfort :- here both bikes are eqaully good and you might think that RTR 200 4V has clipon handlebars so it will more aggressive and less comfortable but it is not the case because it's handlebars are raised Clip-Ons and they doesn't affect comfort and RTR 160 4V's Wide handlebars are also similar to other bikes in it's segment so both of them give you same comfort.6.Refinement and Vibrations :- if you are thinking that RTR 200 4V and RTR 160 4V are similiar to RTR 160 and RTR 180 than it is not the case both bikes are so much refined and they have very less vibrations which are present only in top end and in top end also vibes are very negligible.7.Features :- RTR 160 4V is very feature rich bike but it can't stand a chance against it's father RTR 200 4v which has more features than RTR 160 4V like Gear position indicator and better looking instrument cluster because of white backlight and it comes with slipper clutch which and it is first bike to have Slipper Clutch in it's segment and it is very rare in higher segments also and it is a very useful feature it is far better than normal clutch and both bikes have ABS on board but the ome on RTR 200 4V is Dual channel ABS so It is Functional on both the tyres front and real while RTR 160 have single channel ABS and it is only operational only on front tyre so if you will press rear brake suddenly then rear wheel will end up in locking and slipping.8.Verdict :- if you are on tight budget than RTR 160 4V makes sence but if budget is not concern and you can spend about 20 thousands more you can end up buying a better bike.Thanks
  • It depends on your budget nd mileage...Both the bikes are best sellers in their segments you will get slightly better mileage in 160 Fi abs than rtr 200 fi nd you have to pay slightly lesser for 160cc...Rtr 200 has an edge over 160 in terms of ART-Slipper clutch...both the bikes are almost similar you can't get wrong with any of the two so choose according to your need nd mileage.
  • If you r looking for little more power, 200 is for you but i think 200 doesnt have Kick start & i have seen people dragging the bikes without kick start option .
View All Answers
Q. I am confused between TVS Apache RTR 160 4V and Yamaha FZ S V3 under 1.20 lakh. Please suggest me one. Their is a saying the brakes of Yamaha FZ S V3 are not up to mark. What is the reality - Gixxer 2019?
  • Even I too thought of choosing Apache only, but cost wise not that much diff bro.. only very less price diff, but durable is Yamaha only , even after 5 years of riding Yamaha bikes, it won't go down and won't get vibration and all, but Apache and pulsar will give more vibration.. I was having TVS bike oly before my Yamaha FZ-S V3.. performance also fine only...Before going with Yamaha FZ-S V3, I have checked a list of bikes like RE Thunderbird, RE Bullet classic, Apache 160v4, Apache 200, Yamaha FZ-S v2 and V3, Bajaj Pulsar 160, even Honda Hornet also I have tried. Decided Yamaha FZ-S V3 finally.. took around an year (From Jan 2019 till Nov 23, 2019) ... 😄😄Moreover Apache is Indian made so cost must be lesser than Yamaha which is getting imported and tax duties must be high.. I didn't meant to say Indian bikes are cheaper and Yamaha is good bcos of Foreign made.. but it's a fact... If you consider there is some value for engine and durability of it, go for Yamaha or else Honda bikes than TVS and Bajaj bikes... 😊
  • TVS APACHE 160 4V IS BEST
  • Agreed
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
Compare Bikes