×

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus vs TVS Apache 160 4V

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus Price starts at Rs. 1.23 Lakh which is Rs. 16,708 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced at Rs. 1.07 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus is powered by engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine. NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus is available in 7 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 3 colours. The Comparison NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus vs TVS Apache 160 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Lio Plus Apache RTR 160 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.23 Lakh Rs. 1.07 Lakh
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Engine Displacement ... 159.7 cc
Power ... 16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm

NDS ECO MOTORS Lio Plus vs TVS Apache 160 4V Summary

Specs Lio Plus STDApache RTR 160 4V Drum
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.23 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.07 Lakh View On Road Price
Rating
5.0
(1 Ratings)
4.1
(1816 Ratings)
Engine Type ... SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled
Max Power ... 16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Range 165 km/charge ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. To Be Announced Lio Plus Insurance Rs. 9,033 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance

Engine Type
...
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled
Engine Displacement
...
159.7 cc
Max Power
...
16.02 PS @ 8250 rpm
Max Torque
152.78 Nm @ 100 rpm
14.12 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6
Bore
...
62 mm
Stroke
...
52.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
4
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
...
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
...
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Quarter Mile
...
20.40 s @ 98.91 kmph
Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
22.77m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
42.63m
Mileage (City)
...
54.78 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
49.57 kmpl
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
22.77m

Suspension-Front
...
Telescopic Forks
Chassis
...
Double Cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Suspension-Rear
...
Mono Shock

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-12, Rear :-90/90-12
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Length*Width*Height
...
2035*790*1050 mm^3
Wheelbase
1460 mm
1357 mm
Length
2020 mm
2035 mm
Ground Clearance
...
180 mm
Width
730 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
100 Kg
147 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
...
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
...
130 mm

Battery Type
Lithium Ion
Maintenance Free
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Motor Power
1600 W
...
Battery Charging Time
2 x 4 hours
...
Range
165 km/charge
...
Range (Eco Mode)
225 km/charge
...
Range (Normal Mode)
190 km/charge
...
Pilot Lamps
...
LED Pilot Lamps
Range (Sport Mode)
165 km/charge
...
LED tail lights
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Cruise Control
...
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Charging point
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
...
Oil Cooled
Console
Digital
Digital
Odometer
...
Digital
EBS
...

Lio Plus Alternatives

Apache RTR 160 4V Alternatives

Gaad-Store
Sell Your Car in Best Price

Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

News Updates on Lio Plus and Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best bike compared with Honda Hornet, TVS Apache RTR 160 4v, Yamaha FZ S 3.0 in mileage, pickup, comfort, price, service and spares?
  • If we compare Fi version of all bike then i think pickup of TVS Apache will be more, according to mileage 1st will be Hornet then Yamaha and then Apache but the difference will be only 4-5 kms.If we come to comfort i own Apache and i didnt find any problem with comfort, and for pricing you should contact dealers in the city.
  • Need comment on Suzuki introduer B6 vs Appache RTR160 4V for maintenance free spares avilable, comfort and safety. looking for my colleage going son. pl suggest
  • I have carb. version of apache its good that your bike is giving such a mileage.
View All Answers
Q. I am planning to buy a bike next month. I am confused between Apache rtr 160 4v, Hornet 2.0, Honda Unicorn and FZ/S-Fi V3,. Which one should I buy if my priorities are low maintenance cost, good mileage and good riding quality (comfort and handling). I will be commuting to office daily with frequent rides to native village which has bumpy/rural roads with this.
  • I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above, this is what I noted. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro.Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment.Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.
  • I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro. Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment. Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.
  • All these bikes are good enough and easy for pocket to maintain. The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly as ever despite the slight drop in power and torque figures. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a truly value for money motorcycle in its segment. In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with other options. if you are looking for better power performance, build quality, good features and a more stable bike, you may go for Hornet 2.0. It is comfortable enough and gets a refined and smooth engine too. If we talk about Honda Unicorn, it has always been the go-to bike if you were planning to buy a 150cc commuter. The BS6 update has given the bike a larger motor, while retaining the dynamics of the older bike. It still remains a well-rounded motorcycle, but the BS6 update has come with a hefty price hike.You may compare all these bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better Apache RTR 200 4V or Apache RTR 160 4V
  • Obviously RTR 200 4V is better bike among these two because of reasons given below1.Styling :- RTR 160 4V is Downscaled Version of RTR 200 so looks are subjective this statement is not applicable here And if you will look in pictures RTR 160 4V will look equally good but in real life the difference is apparent in RTR 200 it looks wider and musculer and has splitted seats and gold coloured front forks which stands it out from the commuter crowd.2.Performance :- here also RTR 160 4V can't even stand a chance and there is no argument that RTR 200 4V is sportier bike and it is faster by a big margin whether it is acceleration or top speed RTR 200 will always ho faster and will give you more adrenaline rush.3.Mileage :- mileage is slightly better on RTR 160 4V but it is not a big difference, only 5 kmpl will be lesser on RTR 200 4V in normal riding condition RTR 200 4V gives a mileage of 37-40 and RTR 160 4V gives a mileage of 42-45 but if you are a hardcore rider and if you will ride your bike mostly on highways and if you will ride your bike on speeds like 100 and 110 then RTR 200 4V will give you more mileage because as a 160 cc bike it will be the top end for RTR 160 4V and as my friend told and as i have saw it on youtube milage goes down to 32-35 kmpl and for RTR 200 that speeds are normal because it is 200 cc bike and it is easier for a 200 cc engine to maintain 100 kmph constant speed and it will give normal mileage under these conditions4.handling :- Here also RTR 200 4V's Handling is better than RTR 160 4V's handling because RTR 160 4V has Wide Handlebar and RTR 200 4V has Clip on handlebar and clip on handlebars are known for their sporty handling so if you like cornering so much than RTR 200 is the perfect bike as it also offers you super stickey and grippy Pirelli tyres which are absent on RTR 160 4V5.Comfort :- here both bikes are eqaully good and you might think that RTR 200 4V has clipon handlebars so it will more aggressive and less comfortable but it is not the case because it's handlebars are raised Clip-Ons and they doesn't affect comfort and RTR 160 4V's Wide handlebars are also similar to other bikes in it's segment so both of them give you same comfort.6.Refinement and Vibrations :- if you are thinking that RTR 200 4V and RTR 160 4V are similiar to RTR 160 and RTR 180 than it is not the case both bikes are so much refined and they have very less vibrations which are present only in top end and in top end also vibes are very negligible.7.Features :- RTR 160 4V is very feature rich bike but it can't stand a chance against it's father RTR 200 4v which has more features than RTR 160 4V like Gear position indicator and better looking instrument cluster because of white backlight and it comes with slipper clutch which and it is first bike to have Slipper Clutch in it's segment and it is very rare in higher segments also and it is a very useful feature it is far better than normal clutch and both bikes have ABS on board but the ome on RTR 200 4V is Dual channel ABS so It is Functional on both the tyres front and real while RTR 160 have single channel ABS and it is only operational only on front tyre so if you will press rear brake suddenly then rear wheel will end up in locking and slipping.8.Verdict :- if you are on tight budget than RTR 160 4V makes sence but if budget is not concern and you can spend about 20 thousands more you can end up buying a better bike.Thanks
  • It depends on your budget nd mileage...Both the bikes are best sellers in their segments you will get slightly better mileage in 160 Fi abs than rtr 200 fi nd you have to pay slightly lesser for 160cc...Rtr 200 has an edge over 160 in terms of ART-Slipper clutch...both the bikes are almost similar you can't get wrong with any of the two so choose according to your need nd mileage.
  • If you r looking for little more power, 200 is for you but i think 200 doesnt have Kick start & i have seen people dragging the bikes without kick start option .
View All Answers
View More Questions

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
Compare Bikes