Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache 200 4V

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Price starts at Rs. 1.76 Lakh which is Rs. 51,140 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V priced at Rs. 1.25 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is available in 4 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 4 colours. 56% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 200 4V over Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache 200 4V Comparison

Key Highlights Gixxer SF 250 Apache RTR 200 4V
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.76 Lakh Rs. 1.25 Lakh
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249 cc 197.75 cc
Power 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache 200 4V Summary

Specs Gixxer SF 250 BS6Apache RTR 200 4V Single-channel ABS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.76 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.25 Lakh View On Road Price
(87 Ratings)
(904 Ratings)
Engine Type 4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine BS-VI
Max Power 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 9,438Gixxer SF 250 Insurance Rs. 9,140Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance

Engine Type 4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled Engine BS-VI
Engine Displacement 249 cc 197.75 cc
Max Power 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm 20.5 PS @ 8500 rpm
Max Torque 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm 16.8 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type bs6 bs6
Bore 76 mm 66 mm
Stroke 54.9 mm 57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Ignition ... Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio ... 10.0:1

Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc

Suspension-Front Telescopic Telescopic Forks
Chassis ... Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
Suspension-Rear Swing arm Mono-Tube - Mono Shock

Tyre Size Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre ...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy

Length*Width*Height 2010*740*1035 mm^3 2050*790*1050 mm^3
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1353 mm
Length 2010 mm 2050 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 180 mm
Height 1035 mm 1050 mm
Seat Height 800 mm 800 mm
Width 740 mm 790 mm
Fuel Capacity 12 Liters 12 Liters
Kerb Weight 161 Kg 153 Kg
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter ... 240 mm

Battery Type Maintenance free Maintenance Free
Pilot Lamps ...
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED

ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics ...
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch
Speedometer Digital Digital
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp ...
Clock ...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System Oil Cooled Oil Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital
Navigation ...

  • Sell Your Car in Best Price

    Instant money transfer, RC Transfer, Home Inspection

    COVID safety assured - Contactless experience in whole process

    News Updates on Gixxer SF 250 and Apache RTR 200 4V

    Recently Asked User Questions

    Q. Which is better RTR 200 ABS or Fz25? What is mileage of both?
    • As a owner of rtr 200 4v i am telling you why i chose rtr 200 over fz 25 and then i will tell you why you should opt for fz 25 so let's start with rtr's pros over fz's1.Exhaust note: exhaust note of both the bikes are music to the ear of a rider but in my personal opinion I think RTR's exhaust note is likely superior to that of FZ's 20 exhaust note2. handling characteristics: handling of bobber bikes is so good but RTR's handlingis slightly superior to that of FZ's handling due to the sporty nature of the bike3. suitability: as a short rider I prefer RTR's riding dynamics more than FZS because RTR footpegs is slightly closer to the seat than that of FZS foot pegs so it becomes specially comfortable for short riders while FZ is neutral to the the all size of riders4 pricing: as you know that RTR is is slightly cheaper than FZ and it fulfills my needs also so I preferred RTR over FZnow the points in which which FZ is ahead of RTR1. there is no replacement for displacement: yes it is true because when you will write FZ it will surely feel that it is 250 cc bike and when you will ride RTR then it will give feel of 200 cc bike that exactly it is so if you need more torquey engine more usable power than FZ is quite ahead2: engine refinement: both the bikes are very refined with negligible vibrations but when you're considering specifically for the refinement of the engine then Yamaha is is slightly ahead of TVS and this improves the fuel economy of the FZ i own Apache so I know that its mileage is slightly less than that of every despite of having a smaller engine and slightly less power it gives less mileage so if you love mileage FZ25 should be your pick3: suitability: as I have mentioned earlier that RTR is specially made for shorter riders and it doesn't fits well with the medium-sized rider and the taller riders but it is not the case with the FZ which suits well with all sizes of riders so if you are a rider on taller side FZ should be your pick4. value for money: in spite of RTR being cheaper it is the FZ that is more value for money because it gets bigger engine better mileage and it gets Fi and abs together in that price which is not the case with the RTR rs people because it's a vs model doesn't have Fi so you can not call it value for moneyfinal verdict: both the bikes are very good you cannot go wrong with either of the bikes now it boils down to your personal preference and some subjective opinion that which bike looks more more pleasing to you and which brand is your favourite and the main point is here that what is your budget thanks
    • Both bikes come with 5 gears. engine capacity is different though. I haven’t ridden FZ25. But FZ25 doesn’t comes with ABS and from the safety point of view RTR ABS is good. But few issues with RTR is its stock headlamp doesn’t have enough power for night view, though high beam has enough to see. It comes with Carb only with ABS. Carb seems to feel outdated in this 21st century. On the pros side, it has beautiful weight distribution, the bike feel perfectly balanced to manoeuvre in city traffic, catches 100kmph so sweetly and runs butter smooth. I’ve done 130kmph in my RTR 200 ABS. Instrument cluster has whole lot of information. You don’t need to watch wrist watch or take out your smartphone when you’re late for the office and stucked in the traffic. Clutch feels light (my friend who has Avenger Street 220 said he has got the feel and meaning of Slipper Clutch after riding my machine). FZ25 has refined engine with EFI. But it has ordinary instrument cluster, doesn’t comes with ABS. Bottom line: I would suggest you to wait till 2019 April, you’ll get lot of options to choose from. You’ll get all bikes with ABS and FI will also come in many bikes. Or else EFI will make its way in all bikes from 2020 to comply the BS6 norms. 2019 May also marks the production of BS6 engines from many brands. And if you can’t wait to rev the engine then you should buy RTR ABS as safely is more important than the refinement of EFI (RE Classic 350 the best selling motorcycle of the country still comes CV Carburettor, this has helped me to get my set of wheels). Have a safe ride. Cheers!!!
    • If you want better performance with comfort, go for apache. If you want looks and if you are a speed lover go with FZ.Apache plus points : Fully digital instrument cluster, exhaust sound, Riding posture, comfort, low maintenanceApache drawbacks : halogen headlight, chain noise, neutral gear indicator, tyre sizeFZ plus points : LED headlights, looks, power, broad tyres, instrument clusterFZ drawbacks : price, headlamp spread, relatively high maintenanceALL THE BEST !!! Keep Riding !!!
    View All Answers
    Q. Should i buy TVS Apache RTR 200 4V ABS or wait for MT-15?
    • See Apache is good for the city ride but don't expect the good milage.....but pick is good.....but take a test drive of the mt-15 so if u feel the bike comfortable and pick over all 360degree u have compare and then u buy
    • Rtr 2004v for race like dynamics...mt 15 is a naked designed for streets.soits up to you.but mt15 can do all which space can do
    • Apache is better than mt 15 and also low cost. It gives you slipper clutch and dual channel abs at Rs. 1.4L on road Kolkata. Where the ex-showroom price of mt 15 is Rs. 1.36 offering only single channel abs
    View All Answers
    Q. Which is good Apache RTR 200 4v or Honda Hornet 2.0?
    • Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by a 184.4cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, fuel-injected engine that makes 17.2PS of power at 8500rpm while the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V gets a 197.5cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, engine with oil cooler
    View More Questions

    Popular Bikes Comparison

    • Trending
    • Scooters
    • Sports
    • Cruisers
    Compare Bikes