×

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Comparison

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Price starts at Rs. 1.71 lakh which is Rs. 28,722 costlier than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 priced at Rs. 1.42 lakh. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is 35 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 38.5 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine where as Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 7 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 comes with 1 colours. 52% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 over Bajaj Pulsar RS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.

Pulsar RS200 vs Gixxer SF 250 Specs Overview

Specs/Features Pulsar RS200 Dual ABSGixxer SF 250 MotoGP Edition
Price Rs. 1.43 lakh Rs. 1.71 lakh
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Oil-cooled
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) ... 3.66s
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 35 kmpl 38.5 kmpl
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4-Valve, Triple Spark, DTS-i Engine, liquid Cooled 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Oil-cooled
Engine Displacement (CC) 199.5 cc 249 cc
Power (PS@rpm) 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9000 rpm
Torque (Nm@rpm) 18.6 Nm @ 8000 rpm 22.6 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type bs4 bs4
Bore 76 mm
Stroke 54.9 mm
No Of Cylinders 1 1
Drive Type Chain Drive Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder 4 4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Compression Ratio 11.2:1
Transmission Type Manual Manual
No Of Gears 6 Speed 6 Speed
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
0-60 kmph (sec) 3.66s
Braking (60-0 kmph) 21.64m
Braking (80-0 kmph) 38.16m
Braking (100-0 kmph) 66.26m
Mileage (City) 37.5 kmpl
Mileage (Highway) 40.95 kmpl
Mileage (ARAI) kmpl 35 kmpl 38.5 kmpl
0-100 kmph (sec) 9.57s
Braking 60-0 km/h 21.64m
Suspension-Front Telescopic With Anti Friction Bush Telescopic, Coil Spring, Oil Damped
Chassis Perimeter Frame
Suspension-Rear Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Canister Swingarm Type, Mono Suspension
Tyre Size Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17 Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type Tubeless Tubeless
Radial Tyre Yes Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) 25 psi
Length*Width*Height 1999*765*1114 2010*740*1035
Wheelbase(mm) 1345 mm 1345 mm
Length 1999 mm 2010 mm
Ground Clearance (mm) 157 mm 165 mm
Height 1114 mm 1035 mm
Seat Height 800 mm 800 mm
Width 765 mm 740 mm
Fuel Capacity (Litres) 13 L 12 L
Tail Light LED LED
Front Brake Diameter 300 mm 300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter 230 mm
Battery Type DC MF Maintenance Free
Pilot Lamps
LED tail lights
Turn Signal Lamp LED LED
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Body Type Sports Bikes Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Seat Type Split Split
Pass Switch Yes Yes
Speedometer Digital Digital
Tachometer Analogue
Trip Meter Digital Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp Yes
Clock
Low Battery Indicator Yes
Stepup Seat
Low Oil Indicator Yes
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights Dual Projector
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Oil Cooled
Console Digital Digital
Odometer Digital Digital
Standard Warranty (Years) 2
Standard Warranty (kilometers) 24000

Similar Bike Comparisons

Compare Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one option is great choice Gixxer SF 250 or RS 200?
  • I would suggest you to go for Gixxer SF 250 as it has fresh look as compared to RS 200 which is available in the market from year 2015 also headlight comes with LED in Gixxer SF 250 as compared to projector head lamp in RS 200 which use less battery power.
  • If you are looking for a bike with better engine performance, new features and a great bike with good ergonomics. The Gixxer SF is a great competition for the RS200 with all new stance, amazing styling and the LED offering. However, we would suggest you to take a test ride of both the bikes so that you may compare the b8ikes on the basis of your outlook towards the comfort, features and performance of the bike.Click here for the dealership: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
  • If you ride gixxer 250 it becomes the automatic choice ...power style only that fairing is too small...pulser fans can opt opt for rs 200 ...take a test ride( if you handle big bikes) otherwise see specs...reviews
View All Answers
Q. Which is best pulsar ns200 or rs200?
  • The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is a comfortable city bike with plenty of grunt and agility for a quick race off the traffic lights and to tackle some twisties as well. But the engine feels too strained out on the highway. Also, ergonomically, with the high-set footpegs it’s a tight spot for someone taller than 5 feet 10 inches. Even the brakes fail to inspire confidence under hard braking. Luckily though, TVS does offer ABS as an option. But then, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 also gets ABS, a single-channel unit. Apart from that, the Bajaj is also a more well rounded motorcycle that does everything just right. The ride quality too is better on the Bajaj. So, if your daily riding consists more of city commutes, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is the way to go. But if you are looking to ride your bike out on the highway as well, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a more potent tool to opt for.
  • The Pulsar RS200 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Chakan-based manufacturer. It is a well-rounded package with a good balance of performance and handling without compromising on comfort. What sweetens the deal further is the added safety net of ABS, the fresh design update, and the competitive pricing. On the other hand, Pulsar NS200 comes across as a well-rounded package that can efficiently take on almost every kind of task required. Be it charging into corners, riding flat out on highways or manage daily chores with ease, the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 makes a strong case for itself. It offers good grunt, stopping power and well-balanced ergonomics which makes it an all-rounder. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2zT6uqV
  • RS 200 makes very high frequency vibration but it looks super. RS 200's engine is better than NS200 . I'm don't recommend to buy NS or RS. If your budget is low than you can buy it. I'm recommend to buy Duke 200 or Dominar 400 Both are best for tour and very comfortable. Upgrade your budget up-to 2lacks and buy DUKE 200 or DOMINAR 400
View All Answers
Q. Which is more attractive, comfortable and afforable for daily use?? Pulsar RS200 or ROYAL ENFIELD classic 350??
  • Both the segments are different don't go on Engine Capacity. RS200 is designed for performing well on both race track and for daily commute. RE classic 350 is a tourer/cruiser which has a steady pickup.
  • Why do people always compare two different kinda bikes !?? ...don't compare sports bike with re classic 350 !! sports are meant for speed n power !! if you are a re lover go for it ...when it comes to speed , performance , comfortable long rides , maintenance , daily use go for rs200 !! decent mileage and performance !!
  • Enfield is more comfortable and it depends on the person on attractive perspectives and Enfield is more comfortable for daily ise
View All Answers
View More Questions