Aprilia SR 125 vs Suzuki Access 125 Comparison
Aprilia SR 125 vs Suzuki Access 125
Aprilia SR 125 Price starts at Rs. 71,360 which is Rs. 13,037 costlier than Suzuki Access 125 priced at Rs. 58,323. The claimed mileage for the Aprilia SR 125 is 47.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Access 125 is 64 kmpl. In technical specifications, Aprilia SR 125 is powered by 125 cc engine where as Suzuki Access 125 is powered by 124 cc engine. Aprilia SR 125 is available in 1 different colours while Suzuki Access 125 comes with 2 colours. 53% users have chosen Aprilia SR 125 over Suzuki Access 125 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Aprilia SR 125 vs Suzuki Access 125 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 125 cc | 124 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 9.6 PS @ 7250 rpm | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | ||
| Bore | 52.5 mm | |
| Stroke | 57.4 mm | |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ||
| Compression Ratio | ||
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 9.71s | |
| Quarter Mile | 22.57 s @ 89.07 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 19.63m | |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | 47.6 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Highway) | 52.5 kmpl | |
| Mileage (Overall) | ||
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 64 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ||
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 19.63m |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Forks | Telescopic |
| Chassis | ||
| Suspension-Rear | Monoshock | Swing Arm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-120/70-14 Rear :-120/70-14 | Front :-90/90-12, Rear :-90/100-10 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-14 Inch Rear :-14 Inch | Front :-12 inch, Rear :-10 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Steel Rims |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | 29 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 1870*655*1160 | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1365 mm | 1265 mm |
| Length | 1870 mm | |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 155 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1160 mm | |
| Seat Height | 780 mm | 773 mm |
| Width | 655 mm | |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 6.6 L | 5.6 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | Bulb |
| Front Brake Diameter | 220 mm | |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 140 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | Maintenance Free |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | no | no |
| Body Type | ||
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | With Long Seat | |
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | 21.8 L | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue | Analogue and Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is better, Access 125 or TVS Jupiter?
- Both the scooters are good to buy in their segment. TVS Jupiter offers a lot more features and variety (in the form of variants) than the Activa, thus making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale. Whereas Suzuki has revamped the Access and by the looks of it it looks quite good. It now comes with SEP technology, alloy wheels, an optional front disc and with ride quality as its main focus. Access is a complete package and should help Suzuki make up lost ground despite the competition is rather stiff in the segment. Do take a test ride in order to pick one.
- Access 125 beats the Jupiter, in my opinion.Access is lighter, has more power, a great pick-up, very good mileage, larger boot space and a good riding experience.Jupiter has good mileage too, but Access mileage is also right there.Access is a little more expensive though. But it's worth the extra price.
- TVS Jupiter will be a better pick here as it offers a lot more features and variety. Making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale.
Q. Which is the best Suzuki access 125 or TVS NTorq 125?
- Both are very good scooters.Both are 125cc.Ntorq produces 9.4PS power while Access makes 8.7PSBut Access is lighter than Ntorq, so the power-to-weight ratio is similar for both.Ntorq is much better than Access in terms of features, pick-up and manoeuvrability cz it has bigger tires.However, if your primary reason to buy a scooter is daily commute and fuel efficiency matters to you, go for the Access. It gives me a mileage of 55kmpl when driving under or at 50 in cities on normal fuel. If I put higher octane fuel, it has also given me 62kmpl in city when driving under 50.If you want to just have fun on your scooter and are high on features like a digital console, Bluetooth connectivity, navigation, etc. then go for Ntorq.I will admit that Ntorq is much more fun to ride than Access. But Access is much more practical than Ntorq.
- The Suzuki Access 125 sports a more mature retro design than its competition. However, under the hood, it packs a peppy engine that is fun to ride. It also has decent enough features to satisfy the needs of being a family scooter, and ample amount of floorboard and underseat space. It also offers superior ride quality and comfort in the saddle for both the rider and pillion, making it the ideal family scooter choice. On the other hand, TVS NTorq ticks all the boxes when it comes to practicality and excitement. It offers an engaging ride experience, exceptional performance and a host of features never seen on an Indian scooter before. All this at an attractive price point of Rs 58,750 (ex-showroom Delhi). This helps it in undercutting its Honda and Aprilia rivals by a good margin, while almost matching its competition from Suzuki. It certainly gets a thumbs-up from our side. Also Read - TVS NTorq vs Suzuki Access vs Aprilia SR 125: Road Test Comparison Review: https://bit.ly/2JMh4s9
- In the present scenario, I would pick the NTorq 125. For 2k more, you get little more power which will be negated by the weight, better brakes, wider tyres, next gen instrument cluster with bluetooth connectivity and maps support and a much more refreshing design. TVS also has a better service network as compared to Suzuki. However, i would still wait for a while for the initial niggles to be fixed. Would wait for at least a year after the launch before i pickup a TVS vehicle. If i was in a hurry, would have gone for the Suzuki Access, as its a more tested bike.
Q. Which one is better in between tvs jupiter,suzuki access & honda activa
- Jupiter any day!!* Best ride quality among Jupiter, Activa 5G and access* reasonable mileage while riding single (in fact better that our Activa 5G)* vibration free even at 80kmph while activa 5G vibrates very much over 70kmph* Bigger and better wheels (12inch wheels vs. 10inch for Activa and only a 12inch front wheel for access)* Telescopic suspension which provide very good control while braking, unlike the Activa having a suicidal suspension which loses control upon hard braking of front wheels* Jupiter is cheaper to service and repair than Activa 5G and Suzuki Access
- Jupiter is a bad bike, my friend bought it last year and complains alot. I own a Suzuki Access125 and it's great, I'd say go for it. Activa 5G is also a good bike I've used one of my friend's and the performance is good. So I suggest you go for Access 125 or Activa 5G
- Suzuki Access is better.. go for it..it has long seat, nice telescopic front suspension better style. and better pick up even if u r double seat.not worry to overtaking another vehicle.