Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Honda XBlade Comparison
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Honda XBlade
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Price starts at Rs. 94,195 which is Rs. 13,870 costlier than Honda XBlade priced at Rs. 80,325. The claimed mileage for the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is 40.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Honda XBlade is NA. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is powered by 160.3 cc engine where as Honda XBlade is powered by 162.71 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is available in 3 different colours while Honda XBlade comes with 1 colours. 57% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS160 over Honda XBlade in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Honda XBlade on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Pulsar NS160 vs XBlade Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Pulsar NS160 Twin Disc BS6 | XBlade ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 1.03 lakh | Rs. 89,136 |
| Engine Type | 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark DTS-i engine | Air Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 160.3 cc | 162.71 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 15.5 PS @ 8500 rpm | 14.12 PS @ 8500 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Drum |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 5.3s |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | 4 Stroke, SOHC 4 Valve, Oil Cooled, Twin Spark DTS-i engine | Air Cooled, 4 Stroke, SI Engine |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 160.3 cc | 162.71 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 15.5 PS @ 8500 rpm | 14.12 PS @ 8500 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 14.6 Nm @ 6500 | 13.9 Nm @ 6000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs6 | bs4 |
| Bore | ... | 57.3 mm |
| Stroke | ... | 63.096 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Compression Ratio | ... | 10:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Drum |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | ... | 5.3s |
| Quarter Mile | ... | 19.32 s @ 108.33 kmph |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | ... | 25.62m |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ... | 45.52m |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ... | 17.79s |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | ... | 25.62m |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic with Anti-friction Bush | Telescopic |
| Chassis | Perimeter Frame | Diamond |
| Suspension-Rear | Nitrox mono shock absorber with Canister | Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90 -17 Rear :-120/80 -17 | Front :-80/100-17, Rear :- 130/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch, Rear :-17 inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | ||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 25 psi | 25 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 2017*803*1060 | 2013*786*1115 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1370 mm | 1347 mm |
| Length | 2017 mm | 2013 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 177 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1060 mm | 1115 mm |
| Width | 803.5 mm | 786 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12 L | 12 L |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 260 mm | 276 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 230 mm | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | DC MF | MF |
| Pilot Lamps | LED Pilot Lamps | ... |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ... | |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Split | Single |
| Pass Switch | ||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analogue | ... |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | ||
| Clock | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. I'm 5'5' tall, Which bike would be comfortable to ride among Gixer, hornet, pulsar, xblade?
- All of above bikes would be comfortable for you. Although, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to to judge your riding comfort.
- Honda hornet
- Gixxer would be better choice if seat height is considered
Q. Which one is the best xblade or hornet
- The Honda X-Blade shares its motor with the Hornet 160R. But the 162.71cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine puts out 14PS of power at 8500rpm and 13.9Nm of torque at 6000rpm, which is 1.5PS and 1Nm less than the Hornet 160R. The motor is mated to a 5-speed gearbox. The X-Blade looks a lot more appealing than the Hornet and the Unicorn 160. The only miss here then is the lack of any kind of braking aids. The stopping power on the bike, though, feels lacking. The brakes have decent bite but desperately lack feel. The CB Hornet 160R is for the discerning rider who is looking for a sporty and premium 160cc motorcycle that offers looks, more performance and better safety, thanks to the optional ABS. On the other hand, young riders who are under a strict budget may find the X-Blade alluring, thanks to the touring-friendly ergonomics and an aggressive design language. Read more: Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?- https://bit.ly/2L4dzuk
- The Honda X-Blade shares its motor with the Hornet 160R. But the 162.71cc, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine puts out 14PS of power at 8500rpm and 13.9Nm of torque at 6000rpm, which is 1.5PS and 1Nm less than the Hornet 160R. The motor is mated to a 5-speed gearbox. The X-Blade looks a lot more appealing than the Hornet and the Unicorn 160. The only miss here then is the lack of any kind of braking aids. The stopping power on the bike, though, feels lacking. The brakes have decent bite but desperately lack feel. The CB Hornet 160R is for the discerning rider who is looking for a sporty and premium 160cc motorcycle that offers looks, more performance and better safety, thanks to the optional ABS. On the other hand, young riders who are under a strict budget may find the X-Blade alluring, thanks to the touring-friendly ergonomics and an aggressive design language. Read more: Honda CB Unicorn 160 vs X-Blade vs CB Hornet 160R: What To Choose?- https://bit.ly/2L4dzuk
- I have driven Trigger previously. I have driven Pulsar 180 also. Now, I own Honda XBlade. But both of Honda bikes.... I felt that these are ordinary bikes behind the garb of Honda. I would prefer Pulsar 180 bike most on point of power...pickup if selected out of these three bikes. But Pulsar 180 bike had one drawbacks like its handle felt heavy on drivers' shoulders.
Q. Which one is better to buy Honda Hornet 160r or pulsar ns 160?
- The Pulsar NS 160 gets Bajaj’s patented DTS-i technology. The forte of this motorcycle is its ride quality and its handling characteristics. It ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance and the gearbox is very slick shifting. Refinement levels though, are admirable. The Pulsar NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, On the other hand, in the form of the CB Hornet 160R, Honda now has a competitive offering in the premium 160cc motorcycle segment. It looks the part with its sporty styling and chiselled lines. Performance of the motorcycle is also admirable with respect to its rivals and it offers decent fuel efficiency as well. It seems that Honda have got it right the third time around. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- In the form of the CB Hornet 160R, Honda now has a competitive offering in the premium 160cc motorcycle segment. It looks the part with its sporty styling and chiselled lines. Performance of the motorcycle is also admirable with respect to its rivals and it offers decent fuel efficiency as well. It seems that Honda have got it right the third time around. On the other hand, Pulsar NS 160 gets Bajaj’s patented DTS-i technology. The forte of this motorcycle is its ride quality and its handling characteristics. It ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance and the gearbox is very slick shifting. Refinement levels though, are admirable. The Pulsar NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort.
- The Pulsar NS 160 gets Bajaj’s patented DTS-i technology. The forte of this motorcycle is its ride quality and its handling characteristics. It ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance and the gearbox is very slick shifting. Refinement levels though, are admirable. The Pulsar NS 160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. On the other hand, in the form of the CB Hornet 160R, Honda now has a competitive offering in the premium 160cc motorcycle segment. It looks the part with its sporty styling and chiselled lines. Performance of the motorcycle is also admirable with respect to its rivals and it offers decent fuel efficiency as well. Do take a test ride in order to judge your riding comfort. Click on the link to compare them: https://bit.ly/2oi5bOc
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
