Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha FZ X

Last Updated: August 7, 2026

Bajaj Pulsar N160 price starts at Rs. 1.16 Lakh, which is Rs. 9,028 cheaper than the base variant of Yamaha FZ X, priced at Rs. 1.25 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Pulsar N160 offers a claimed 59.11 kmpl, while the FZ X delivers 55.11 kmpl. On the performance front, the Pulsar N160 uses a 164.82cc engine producing 16 PS @ 8750 rpm and the FZ X a 149cc engine producing 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar N160 and FZ X, the Pulsar N160 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the FZ X stands out for a lighter kerb weight.

...Read More

Pulsar N160 vs FZ X Comparison Summary

Specification Bajaj Pulsar N160Yamaha FZ X
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.16 LakhRs. 1.25 Lakh
Mileage 59.11 kmpl55.11 kmpl
Engine 164.82 cc149 cc
Max power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Kerb weight 147 Kg139 Kg

Pulsar N160 vs FZ X Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar N160 Single Channel Single SeatYamaha FZ X Metallic Black and Dark Matte Blue
Rating
445 reviews
223 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.16 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.25 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI Air Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Colors
Yamaha FZ X Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,471 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,606 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,287 Pulsar N160 Insurance Rs. 6,929 FZ X Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
2 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
2
Claimed Top Speed
120 kmph
96 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI
Air Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Displacement
164.82 cc
149 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
16 PS @ 8750 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm
13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Bore
58 mm
57.3 mm
Stroke
62.38 mm
57.9 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Not Available
TCI (Transistor Controlled Ignition)
Compression Ratio
10.3 ± 0.3 :1
9.6 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
59.11 kmpl
55.11 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.55s
Not Available
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.64m
23.21m
City Mileage (Tested)
59.11 kmpl
55.11 kmpl
Highway Mileage (Tested)
44.38 kmpl
48.67 kmpl
Braking 80-0 km/h
33.91m
40.84m
Estimated Mileage
45-50 kmpl
Not Available
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
16.55s
11.01s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.14s
10.68s
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Suspension-Front
Telescopic Forks (37 mm)
Telescopic Fork, 41mm Inner Tube Diameter, With Fork Boot
Suspension-Rear
Nitrox Monoshock
7-Step Adjustable Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
33 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
33 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.8 L
1.6 L
Length*Width*Height
1989*743*1050 mm3
2020*785*1100 mm3
Wheelbase
1358 mm
1330 mm
Length
1989 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
165 mm
Height
1050 mm
1100 mm
Width
743 mm
785 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
14 L
10 L
Kerb Weight
147 Kg
139 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
300 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
220 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
USB charging port
Yes
Not Available
Headlight
LED
LED
Projector head light
Yes
Not Available

Frame Type
Tubular Frame
Single Downtube Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD Connectivity
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Traction Control
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Not Available
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Yes
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Street Bikes, Commuter Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
Yes
Yes
Tachometer
Analogue
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Not Available
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Not Available
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Not Available

1st Service
500-750 Km / 30-45 Days
1000 Kms / 1 Month
2nd Service
4500-5000 Km / 8 Months
4000 Kms / 5 Months
3rd Service
9500-10000 Km / 1 Year
7000 Kms / 9 Months
4th Service
Not Available
10000 Kms

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar N160
  • Engine is very refined and tractable
  • Sporty and confidence-inspiring handling
  • Only bike with dual-channel ABS in the 160cc segment
Yamaha FZ X
  • Smooth and refined engine, High fuel efficiency, especially in the city, Comfortable ergonomics
Bajaj Pulsar N160
  • Rear monoshock is firm, resulting in a bouncy ride
  • Not-very extensive features list
  • Looks like a clone of the Pulsar N250
Yamaha FZ X
  • Polarising design might not appeal to everyone, Performance is severely lacking

Is Bajaj Pulsar N160 Better Than Yamaha FZ X?

100% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N160 over Yamaha FZ X in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1176 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Yamaha FZ X on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and features in your bike. On the basis of safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar N160 FZ X
Mileage 4.3 4.0
Performance 4.5 3.8
Comfort 4.4 4.2
Maintenance 4.1 3.7
Safety 0.1 0.1
Features 4.4 3.9
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Yamaha FZ X

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike is better FZ-X or CB200X?
  • Very bad bike fz x
  • YES.
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The Yamaha FZ-X is a great commuter thanks to its easy-going ergonomics and suspension. But there’s no going around the fact that the Yamaha FZ-X is a head-turner (may not be for all the right reasons). So, if you are on a hunt for a bike that stands out in the general crop of commuters in the segment, the Yamaha FZ-X is the one for you. On the other hand, Honda CB200X offers comfortable ergonomics and a relaxed riding position. This bike has unmistakably stylish looks. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha FZ-X: Road Test Review.-Honda’s Affordable ADV Reaches Dealerships: Image Gallery.-Honda India, Can We Get The CRF190L ADV Soon?.
Q. I am 5.4 and using R15S, now I want to shift to something more comfortable. I am confused between Yamaha FZ-X and Avenger Street 160?
  • FZ-X is better option. Go for it
Q. Honda hness 350 or fzx which is best to buy
  • Honda Hness 350 gives you more power and FZ-X gives you better mileage but less power as compare to h'ness..! For FZ-X you have to pay 1.5lacs and for H'ness you have to pay 2.5lac almost 1 lac price difference in both of bikes. It depends upon your budget and choice
  • Selecting between the Honda Hness CB350 and Yamaha FZ-X would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The FZ-X is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, it does work extremely well in the city. But on the other hand, it doesn’t really hit the mark in any other respect. We really think Yamaha would’ve been better off getting the XSR155 to India since they already make the MT15 here. Sure it might have been a bit more expensive, but compared to the Huskies or the CB350RS, it would’ve still been the most affordable neo-retro bike in the country. It would’ve even made sense for Yamaha to build a neo-retro bike on the FZ25 platform. That way it would at least have had more punch and better highway legs. At the end of the day, if you wanted a bike in this 150-160cc segment, and Bluetooth connectivity isn’t a big deal for you, the standard FZ-FI is 98 percent the same bike, looks much, much better, and saves you 12,000 Rupees in the process. If you want our wholehearted recommendation, that would be it. Whereas, if you are looking for a comfortable, easy-to-handle bike with marries old-school charm and modern sensibilities well, you may go for Honda Hness CB350. It gets a prominent thumper exhaust note and it is the most affordable bike in India to get traction control. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership.Read more:- Yamaha FZ-X: Road Test ReviewRead more:- Honda H’ness CB350 Road Test Review: Should RE Be Worried?
|Bajaj Pulsar N160 Community

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Vs Yamaha FZ X FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha FZ X?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance and features in your bike. On the basis of safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha FZ X?
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is cheaper than Yamaha FZ X by ₹9,028.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha FZ X?
For the Single Channel Single Seat version, 164.82 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar N160 produces 16 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Metallic Black and Dark Matte Blue version, 149 cc Petrol engine of FZ X produces 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar N160 has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Yamaha FZ X

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar N160
Pulsar N160
FZ X
FZ X
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha FZ X
×