Aprilia SR 125 vs TVS NTORQ Comparison
Aprilia SR 125 vs TVS NTORQ
Aprilia SR 125 Price starts at Rs. 71,360 which is Rs. 11,898 costlier than TVS NTORQ 125 priced at Rs. 59,462. The claimed mileage for the Aprilia SR 125 is 47.6 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for TVS NTORQ 125 is 47 kmpl. In technical specifications, Aprilia SR 125 is powered by 125 cc engine where as TVS NTORQ 125 is powered by 124.79 cc engine. Aprilia SR 125 is available in 1 different colours while TVS NTORQ 125 comes with 1 colours. 62% users have chosen TVS NTORQ 125 over Aprilia SR 125 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Aprilia SR 125 vs TVS NTORQ 125 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, SOHC | 4 stroke, Single Cylinder, Air Cooled, OHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 125 cc | 124.79 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 9.6 PS @ 7250 rpm | 9.4 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 9.9 Nm @ 6250 rpm | 10.5 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| Bore | ||
| Stroke | ||
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 3 | |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | ||
| Compression Ratio | ||
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Drum |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Synchronized Braking System |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 9.71s | 9s |
| Quarter Mile | 22.57 s @ 89.07 kmph | |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 19.63m | 18.93m |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | ||
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ||
| Mileage (City) | 47.6 kmpl | 47 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | 52.5 kmpl | 53.4 kmpl |
| Mileage (Overall) | 52 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | ||
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | ||
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 19.63m | 18.93m |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic Forks | Telescopic Suspension |
| Chassis | High Rigidity Under Bone Rectangular Tube Type | |
| Suspension-Rear | Monoshock | Gas filled Hydraulic Type Coil Spring Shock Absorber |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-120/70-14 Rear :-120/70-14 | Front :-100/80-12, Rear :- 110/80-12 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-14 Inch Rear :-14 Inch | Front :-12 inch, Rear :-12 inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi | 24 psi |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 1865*710*1160 | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1365 mm | 1285 mm |
| Length | 1865 mm | |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 155 mm | 155 mm |
| Height | 1160 mm | |
| Seat Height | 780 mm | |
| Width | 710 mm | |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 6.6 L | 5 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 220 mm | 130 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 140 mm | 130 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | MF | MF |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | Yes | |
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | no | no |
| Body Type | ||
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| External Fuel Filling | Yes | |
| Clock | ||
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | ||
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | 22 L | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | Yes | |
| Mobile Connectivity | ||
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | Yes | |
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | Yes | |
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | ||
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which scooter is best TVS Ntorq 125 or Activa 125?
- Activate 125 and Ntorq cannot be compared as the two belong to two different segments. The former is an ideal family scooter with a good dose of comfort. Ntorq is for outright performance (that doesn't mean it's not comfortable). Also note that the wheels and tyres are totally different on Ntorq, they much resemble those of an Apache. If for some reason you cannot buy a 125-150 cc motorcycle, buy an Ntorq. You\\ll never regret your decision. I have regularly done group tours when my friends were riding Pulsars, Apaches plus two RE Classic 350s. My Ntorq never lagged behind though it is a mere scooter.
- In case of power activa can never reach with ntorq because it has a lot more power than the activaActiva will provide a little more Mileage but not at a big gap only a little ntorq has a lot of mileage while looking its distribution of power and perfomence that any other scootters dont have.Durability and comfort is good for both of them but in case of comfort the digital cluster,larger mirrors that apache have.... And a lot more.. It cannot be said throgh words we can only feel it through the ride..... I will suggest Ntorq in case of comfort.
- Editing my review, after running 3700km & around 8 months i would prefer Activa 125 over TV's ntorq because only engine is plus point else nothing whole body is plastic/fibre & floor has no support underneath not even pipe frame & plastic sounds..... some kind of rattling noise always come. Activa 125 only handle plastic is noisy else ok.
Q. Which scooter is best Honda Grazia or TVS NTORQ?
- Grazia and Ntorq cannot be compared as the two belong to two different segments. The former is an ideal commuter with a good dose of performance and comfort. Ntorq is for outright performance (that doesn't mean it's not comfortable). Also note that the wheels and tyres are totally different on Ntorq, they much resemble those of an Apache. If for some reason you cannot buy a 125-150 cc motorcycle, buy an Ntorq. You'll never regret your decision. I have regularly done group tours when my friends were riding Pulsars, Apaches plus two RE Classic 350s. My Ntorq never lagged behind though it is a mere scooter.
- It depends on your preferences such as weight of bike, bluetooth navigation, seating comfort, how many people you will be taking, what distance you will be travelling, and so on. Please do not just blindly buy a bike based on ratings. Even if the bike is good you have to check if it will be good for you.
- Both of them are good but if you want power, style, features, etc then go for NTORQ. But if you just want the Honda tag then go for Grazia as there is nothing new in it except the body styling. I would suggest NTORQ as three of my friend own Grazia and two of us(including me) own the NTORQ and they said that the Grazia is good only till first service and after that it becomes a liability. P.S- The other friend of mine sold his Grazia to get the NTORQ!! So, think wisely!!!
Q. Which is better to buy NTORQ or Jupiter?
- Both the scooter are great in their segment. The TVS Jupiter is the Honda Activa's biggest rival. It offers a lot more features and variety (in the form of variants) than the Activa, thus making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale. On the other hand, the TVS NTorq ticks all the boxes when it comes to practicality and excitement. It offers an engaging ride experience, exceptional performance and a host of features never seen on an Indian scooter before. Its price helps it in undercutting its Honda and Aprilia rivals by a good margin, while almost matching its competition from Suzuki. It certainly gets a thumbs-up from our side.We would suggest you to take a test ride in order to clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest dealership details: https://www.zigwheels.com/bikes/dealers
- Both the scooters are good to buy in their segments. TVS Jupiter is the Honda Activa's biggest rival. It offers a lot more features and variety (in the form of variants) than the Activa, thus making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale. The TVS NTorq ticks all the boxes when it comes to practicality and excitement. It offers an engaging ride experience, exceptional performance and a host of features never seen on an Indian scooter before.
- Yes ntorq is way more powerful enjoyable scooter. Because of their 12 inch wheels both front and rear.It is a best scooter for city usage and long riding.TVS got ramora tyres which is grippy. Ntorq biggest draw is its 'smart connect system' which allows the rider to use the TVS NTORQ APP & connect his/her smartphone to the scooter. This allows you to get access to all sorts of information such as call arerts,SMS alert, navigation assist and also access to 3 trip meter,lap timer,0 to 60 KMPH time, service reminder and many more. The ntorq makes 1.46bhp more than Jupiter.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
