BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Price starts at Rs. 3.29 Lakh which is Rs. 39,000 costlier than base model of BMW G 310 RR priced at Rs. 2.90 Lakh. The claimed mileage of BMW G 310 RR is 30.3 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is 27 kmpl. In technical specifications, BMW G 310 RR is powered by 312.12 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is powered by 647.95 cc engine. BMW G 310 RR is available in 3 different colours while Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 comes with 5 colours. The Comparison BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

G 310 RR vs Continental GT 650

Key Highlights G 310 RR STDContinental GT 650 Standard
Engine Type Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers, wet sump lubrication Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC
Max Power 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm

G 310 RR vs Continental GT 650 Key Highlights

Basic Info BMW G 310 RR STDRoyal Enfield Continental GT 650 Standard
Rating
117 reviews
536 reviews
Brand Name BMW Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.90 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 3.53 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers, wet sump lubrication Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC
Max Power 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
BMW G 310 RR Colors
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 7,940 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 9,668 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 13,567 G 310 RR Insurance Rs. 21,628 Continental GT 650 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
4
4
Claimed Top Speed
160 kmph
170 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
...
E20
Engine Type
Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers, wet sump lubrication
Inline Twin Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC
Engine Displacement
312.12 cc
647.95 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
34 PS @ 9700 rpm
47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm
Max Torque
27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
Bore
80 mm
78 mm
Stroke
62.1 mm
67.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
2
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Digital Spark Ignition
Compression Ratio
10.9 :1
9.5:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
4 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
30.3 kmpl
27 kmpl

Suspension-Front
Upside down fork, Ø 41 mm, 140 mm
41 mm front fork, Travel - 110 mm
Suspension-Rear
Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, 119 mm
Coil-over shocks, Travel - 88 mm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
39 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :- 150/60-17
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-18
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
811 mm
804 mm
Load carrying capacity
130 kg
...
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
1 L
1.5 L
Gross Weight
304 kg
400 kg
Length*Width*Height
2001*767*1135 mm3
2119*780*1067 mm3
Wheelbase
1365 mm
1398 mm
Length
2001 mm
2119 mm
Ground Clearance
...
174 mm
Height
1135 mm
1067 mm
Width
767 mm
780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
11 L
12.5 L
Kerb Weight
174 Kg
214 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
300 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Size
240 mm
240 mm

Roadside assistance
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 12AH
Projector head light
...

Frame Type
Tubular space frame
Steel Tubular, Double Cradle Frame
Digital Display Type
TFT
...
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
...
Pillion Grab Rail
...
Riding Modes
Track,Rain,Sports,Urban
...
Traction Control
...
Low battery alert
Brightness Control
...
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
...
Rear Footpegs
Daytime Running Lamps
...
Additional Features/Information
Rain/Urban Mode Power - 25.8 PS @ 7700 rpm, Rain/Urban Mode Torque - 25 Nm @ 6700 rpm, Rain/Urban Mode Speed - 125 kmph, Revolution Counter, On Board Computer
...
Windscreen
...
Gear Position Indicator
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Side Stand Warning
Exhaust Heat Shield
...
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cafe Racer Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
Digital
Analogue
Gradeability
...
24°
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
...

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years
3 Years or 40,000 Km
4th Service
...
15000 Kms/550 Days
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
...
40000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Classic retro styling appeals to many
  • Not-too-aggressive riding posture
  • Great handling & nice exhaust note
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Could have better brakes
  • Clutch is on slightly heavier side
  • Customization options are limited

Is BMW G 310 RR Better Than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?

55% users have chosen BMW G 310 RR over Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1380 users have also rated BMW G 310 RR and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences BMW G 310 RR is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of safety. On the basis of performance and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor G 310 RR Continental GT 650
Mileage 4.1 3.8
Performance 4.7 4.7
Comfort 4.5 4.3
Maintenance 3.9 3.9
Safety 0.1 0.4
Features 4.7 4.2
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

BMW G 310 RR Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on BMW G 310 RR and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike is better, TVS Apache RR 310 or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and TVS Apache RR 310 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, TVS has done an incredible job in ironing out the sore spots of the Apache RR 310 with the BS6 update. It is loaded with tech, making it the most technologically advanced motorcycle in its class. The new prices are quite close to its fiercest rival -- the KTM RC 390. While it may lack the outright performance of the RC 390, the Apache RR 310 BS6 makes up for it by being a well-rounded machine that can do daily duties as well as corner carving or even touring, for that matter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. Which one is better Himalayan or GT 650
  • Both Royal Enfield Himalayan and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 are brilliant options, however, selecting one would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, usage of the bike, features requirement, etc. The Himalayan BS6 is a well-rounded package which is now just that little bit better than before. The Himalayan certainly isn’t flawless or entirely satisfactory in any singular aspect, but it makes up for these gaps by painting a picture of opportunity, inciting you to travel and explore on a whim. On the other hand, the GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which is best to buy between continental gt 650 or royal enfield interceptor 650
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, if you are not on a limited budget, then you may definitely opt for the Interceptor 650. The bike offers a brilliant engine with loads of torque from the get-go and a nice soundtrack accompanying it. Quality and fit and finish levels are quite good and the motorcycle feels built to last. On top of that, the Interceptor 650 is the most affordable multi-cylinder bike in India. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
|BMW G 310 RR Community

BMW G 310 RR Vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 FAQs

Which bike is best between BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
As per the users experiences BMW G 310 RR is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of safety. On the basis of performance and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
The BMW G 310 RR is cheaper than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 by ₹63,105.
Which bike offers better performance BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
For the STD version, 312.12 cc Petrol engine of G 310 RR produces 34 PS @ 9700 rpm of power and 27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Standard version, 647.95 cc Petrol engine of Continental GT 650 produces 47.4 PS @ 7150 rpm of power and 52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.

Images of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Which one do you like more?
G 310 RR
G 310 RR
Continental GT 650
Continental GT 650
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
×