Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Last Updated: October 28, 2026
Bajaj Pulsar N160 price starts at Rs. 1.18 Lakh, which is Rs. 48,595 cheaper than the base variant of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0, priced at Rs. 1.66 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Pulsar N160 offers a claimed 47 kmpl, while the MT 15 Version 2.0 delivers 56.87 kmpl. On the performance front, the Pulsar N160 uses a 164.82cc engine producing 16 PS @ 8750 rpm and the MT 15 Version 2.0 a 155cc engine producing 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar N160 and MT 15 Version 2.0, the MT 15 Version 2.0 is the better pick for mileage and performance, while the Pulsar N160 stands out for affordability.
...Read More
Pulsar N160 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison Summary
| Specification | Bajaj Pulsar N160 | Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.18 Lakh | Rs. 1.66 Lakh |
| Mileage | 47 kmpl | 56.87 kmpl |
| Engine | 164.82 cc | 155 cc |
| Max power | 16 PS @ 8750 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 151 Kg | 141 Kg |
-
Bajaj Pulsar N160
Rs. 1.18 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,521 Get Diwali OffersYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Rs. 1.66 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,794 View October Offers
Pulsar N160 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar N160 SD USD Single Seat | Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
450 reviews
|
1693 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Yamaha |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.18 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.66 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI | Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Max Power | 16 PS @ 8750 rpm | 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch | Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 3,521
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,794
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 10,671 Pulsar N160 Insurance | Rs. 11,488 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Engine is very refined and tractable
- Sporty and confidence-inspiring handling
- Only bike with dual-channel ABS in the 160cc segment
- A refined engine
- Sporty handling, and nimble
- Looks aggressive
- Rear monoshock is firm, resulting in a bouncy ride
- Not-very extensive features list
- Looks like a clone of the Pulsar N250
- Lacks bottom end grunt
- Stiff suspension
- Pillion seat is not comfortable
Is Bajaj Pulsar N160 Better Than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
72% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N160 over Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 3591 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance and features. On the basis of comfort, maintenance and safety user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Pulsar N160 | MT 15 Version 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Performance | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Comfort | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Maintenance | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Safety | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Features | 4.4 | 4.7 |
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
Recently Asked User Questions
- Yes
- MT 15 V2 bike
- Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
- Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs
Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Bajaj Pulsar N160
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0









