×

Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.64 Lakh which is Rs. 41,546 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar N160 priced at Rs. 1.22 Lakh. The claimed mileage . In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar N160 is powered by 164.82 cc engine , while Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 is powered by 155 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar N160 is available in 4 different colours while Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 comes with 5 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Summary

Basic Info Pulsar N160 Single Channel ABSMT 15 V2 STD
Rating
71 reviews
442 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.22 Lakh View On Road Price Rs. 1.64 Lakh View On Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Oil cooled, FI Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Pulsar N160 Colors
MT 15 V2 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Insurance Rs. 11,685 Pulsar N160 Insurance Rs. 11,455 MT 15 V2 Insurance

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Oil cooled, FI
Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
164.82 cc
155 cc
Max Power
16 PS @ 8750 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6
bs6
Bore
...
58.0 mm
Stroke
...
58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
...
11.6 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
19.79m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
35.05m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
58.20m
Mileage (City)
...
56.87 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
47.94 kmpl

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
810 mm
Length*Width*Height
...
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1358 mm
1325 mm
Length
...
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
170 mm
Width
...
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
14 Liters
10 Liters
Kerb Weight
152 Kg
139 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
280 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
220 mm

Battery Type
...
12 V/4.0 Ah
Additional Features
Gear indicator
Y-Connect, VVA, Gear Position Indicator, Fuel consumption indicator, Shift timing light, VVA indicator, Sidestand engine cut-off switch, Position Light - LED
Call/SMS alerts
...
USB charging port
...
LED tail lights
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
...
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty
...
Clock
Digital
Passenger Footrest
...
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives

Bajaj Pulsar N160

  • Extremely tractable and refined engine; Confident handling dynamics; Only 160cc bike with dual-channel ABS

Bajaj Pulsar N160

  • Firm monoshock tune leads to a bouncy ride; Misses out on some modern features; Looks exactly like the N250
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor

Pulsar N160 and MT 15 V2 Competitors

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.

Pulsar N160 Vs MT 15 V2 Comparison FAQs

Which bike is cheaper Pulsar N160 vs MT 15 V2?

The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is cheaper than Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 by Rs. 41,546.

Which bike offers better performance Pulsar N160 vs MT 15 V2?

For the Single Channel ABS version, 164.82 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar N160 produces 16 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of MT 15 V2 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque

Images of Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0,Bajaj Pulsar N160

Popular Bikes Comparison

  • Trending
  • Scooters
  • Sports
  • Cruisers
  • Commuters
Compare Bikes
Select Category