Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.64 Lakh which is Rs. 9,710 costlier than base model of Yamaha FZS 25 priced at Rs. 1.55 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Yamaha FZS 25 is 40 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is 56.87 kmpl. In technical specifications, Yamaha FZS 25 is powered by 249 cc cc engine , while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is powered by 155 cc engine. Yamaha FZS 25 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 comes with 5 colours. The Comparison Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

FZS 25 vs MT 15 Version 2.0

Key Highlights FZS 25 STDMT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Engine Type Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 20.8 PS @ 8000 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm

FZS 25 vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Yamaha FZS 25 STDYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Rating
88 reviews
1675 reviews
Brand Name Yamaha Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.55 Lakh Rs. 1.64 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 20.8 PS @ 8000 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI ...
Rs. 4,736 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance ... Rs. 11,455 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
...
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
...
4
Claimed Top Speed
...
122 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
...
BS6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
...
E20
Engine Type
Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
249 cc
155 cc
Gear Box
...
6 Speed
Max Power
20.8 PS @ 8000 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
20.1 Nm @ 6000 rpm
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
...
Bore
74 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
58 mm
58.7 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
...
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
9.8:1
11.6 : 1

Front Brake
...
Disc
Rear Brake
...
Disc
Front Caliper
...
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
...
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
40 kmpl
56.87 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
14.28s
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
19.79m

Suspension-Front
...
Telescopic Upside Down Front Fork, Dia. 37 mm
Suspension-Rear
...
Linked Type Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
...
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
...
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
...
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
...
39 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
...
1.6 L
Length*Width*Height
2015*820*1105 mm3
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1360 mm
1325 mm
Length
2015 mm
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
170 mm
Height
1105 mm
1070 mm
Width
820 mm
800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
14 Liters
10 L
Kerb Weight
154 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
282 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
220 mm
220 mm

Headlight
LED
LED
Charging at Home
...
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 4AH
Projector head light
...
Charging at Charging Station
...
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
...

Frame Type
...
Deltabox
Digital Display Type
...
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
...
Trip Meter
...
Digital
Real Time Mileage Indicator
...
Pillion Seat
...
Traction Control
...
Brightness Control
...
No. of Tripmeters
...
2
Rear Footpegs
...
Daytime Running Lamps
...
Additional Features/Information
...
Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
Gear Position Indicator
...
ABS Type
...
Dual Channel
Side Stand Warning
...
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console Type
...
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Display
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Digital
Low Oil Indicator
...
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
DRLs
...

Vehicle Warranty
...
2 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
...
13000 Kms
Standard Warranty (Years)
...
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
...
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • A refined engine
  • Sporty handling, and nimble
  • Looks aggressive
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Stiff suspension
  • Pillion seat is not comfortable
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Yamaha FZS 25 and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
Q. Which bike is the between FZS 25 or MT-15?
  • Both Yamaha MT-15 and FZS 25 are from different segments and cater to different audiences. The FZ 25 is amongst the comfiest motorcycles in the segment, offers oodles of torque, and will floor you with its commuting capabilities. However, as much as we love the refinement and quality of this bike, there’s no denying it lacks the eagerness of a quarter-litre motorcycle. On the other hand, the MT-15 is an exciting motorcycle to ride. The MT-15 is supposed to bridge the best of both worlds: the FZ’s convenience with the R15’s mad performance. Now, it might not feel as mad as the KTM 200 Duke but it definitely feels more polished, precise and refined, almost like a samurai. It makes every commute an event and that's exactly what you want from a streetfighter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you to take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details. Read More: - Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15
|Yamaha FZS 25 Community

Yamaha FZS 25 Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 has out rated Yamaha FZS 25 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Yamaha FZS 25 is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 by ₹9,710.
Which bike offers better performance Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
For the STD version, 249 cc Petrol engine of FZS 25 produces 20.8 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 20.1 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Metallic Black version, 155 cc Petrol engine of MT 15 Version 2.0 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Yamaha FZS 25 has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Yamaha FZS 25

  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Yamaha FZS 25 vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×