Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.66 Lakh which is Rs. 28,748 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar 220F priced at Rs. 1.37 Lakh. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220F is powered by 220 cc engine , while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is powered by 155 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220F is available in 4 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 comes with 6 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar 220F vs MT 15 Version 2.0

Key Highlights Pulsar 220F STDMT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Engine Type Twin Spark FI Engine, Oil Cooled Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm

Pulsar 220F vs MT 15 Version 2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar 220F STDYamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Metallic Black
Rating
23 reviews
1675 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.37 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.66 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Twin Spark FI Engine, Oil Cooled Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar 220F Colors
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,088 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 4,768 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,990 Pulsar 220F Insurance Rs. 11,473 MT 15 Version 2.0 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
2 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
4
Claimed Top Speed
...
122 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
BS6.2
BS6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Twin Spark FI Engine, Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
220 cc
155 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Bore
67 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
62.4 mm
58.7 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Digital Twin Spark
...
Compression Ratio
9.8 : 1
11.6 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
...

Mileage (Overall)
...
56.87 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
14.28s
Braking 60-0 km/h
...
19.79m

Suspension-Front
37 mm Telescopic
Telescopic Upside Down Front Fork, Dia. 37 mm
Suspension-Rear
Twin Hydraulic Suspension
Linked Type Monocross Suspension

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
28 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
30 psi
36 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
39 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
805 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
3.2 L
1.6 L
Gross Weight
310 Kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2035*750*1165 mm3
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1350 mm
1325 mm
Length
2035 mm
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
170 mm
Height
1165 mm
1070 mm
Width
750 mm
800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
15 L
10 L
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Size
280 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
220 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 4AH
Projector head light
Pilot Lamps
...

Frame Type
Double Cradle Down Tube
Deltabox
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Real Time Mileage Indicator
Vehicle Location Tracking
...
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
...
Calls and Messaging
...
Navigation assist
...
Traction Control
...
Low battery alert
...
Brightness Control
No. of Tripmeters
2
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
...
Rear Footpegs
Daytime Running Lamps
Additional Features/Information
...
Variable Valve Actuation (VVA)
Gear Position Indicator
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
...
ABS Type
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Distance To Empty
...
Navigation Type
Turn-by-turn
...
Side Stand Warning
Physical Key
...
Exhaust Heat Shield
...
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
4th Service
...
13000 Kms
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • A refined engine
  • Sporty handling, and nimble
  • Looks aggressive
Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Stiff suspension
  • Pillion seat is not comfortable

Is Bajaj Pulsar 220F Better Than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?

100% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar 220F over Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2876 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar 220F and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and safety in your bike. But Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort, maintenance and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar 220F MT 15 Version 2.0
Mileage 4.4 4.6
Performance 4.9 4.7
Comfort 4.3 4.5
Maintenance 4.2 4.3
Safety 1.8 0.1
Features 2.8 4.7
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar 220F Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar 220F and Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.

Bajaj Pulsar 220F Vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and safety in your bike. But Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort, maintenance and features.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
The Bajaj Pulsar 220F is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 by ₹28,748.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0?
For the STD version, 220 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar 220F produces 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Metallic Black version, 155 cc Petrol engine of MT 15 Version 2.0 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar 220F has better performance.

Images of Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0 and Bajaj Pulsar 220F

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar 220F
Pulsar 220F
MT 15 Version 2.0
MT 15 Version 2.0
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Yamaha MT 15 Version 2.0
×