KTM RC 160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350

Last Updated: July 31, 2026

Royal Enfield Classic 350 price starts at Rs. 1.87 Lakh, which is Rs. 5,121 cheaper than the base variant of KTM RC 160, priced at Rs. 1.93 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the RC 160 offers a claimed 36 kmpl, while the Classic 350 delivers 41.55 kmpl. On the performance front, the RC 160 uses a 164.2cc engine producing 19 PS @ 9500 rpm and the Classic 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the RC 160 and Classic 350, the Classic 350 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the RC 160 stands out for a lighter kerb weight.

...Read More

RC 160 vs Classic 350 Comparison Summary

Specification KTM RC 160Royal Enfield Classic 350
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.93 LakhRs. 1.87 Lakh
Mileage 36 kmpl41.55 kmpl
Engine 164.2 cc349 cc
Max power 19 PS @ 9500 rpm20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Kerb weight 155 Kg195 Kg

RC 160 vs Classic 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info KTM RC 160 STDRoyal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch
Rating
1 review
1104 reviews
Brand Name KTM Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.93 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.87 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-oil Cooled
Max Power 19 PS @ 9500 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
KTM RC 160 Colors
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-482.6 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 5,547 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 5,400 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,928 RC 160 Insurance Rs. 11,842 Classic 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
Not Available
2
Claimed Top Speed
118 kmph
120 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
Not Available
E20
Engine Type
4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, Internal Combustion Engine
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
164.2 cc
349 cc
Gear Box
6 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
19 PS @ 9500 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
66 mm
72 mm
Stroke
48 mm
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Inductive
Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI)
Compression Ratio
11.97:1
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum
Front Caliper
Not Available
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
Not Available
1 Piston

Mileage (Overall)
36 kmpl
41.55 kmpl
Power to Weight Ratio
0.12
Not Available
City Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
41.55 kmpl
Highway Mileage (Tested)
Not Available
37.77 kmpl
Estimated Mileage
Not Available
35-40 kmpl
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
Not Available
90 mm
Suspension-Front
WP APEX USD forks, 37 mm diameter, Travel - 130 mm
Telescopic, 41 mm Forks, Travel - 130 mm
Suspension-Rear
Canister Monoshock, 6 step Adjustable, Travel - 165 mm
Twin Tube Emulsion Shock Absorbers With 6 Step Adjustable Preload, Travel - 90 mm

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
32 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
Not Available
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
Not Available
36 psi
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, , Rear :-140/60-17
Front :-100/90-19, , Rear :-120/80-18
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-482.6 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Make
MRF
Not Available
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Dry Weight
148 kg
Not Available
Seat height
830 mm
805 mm
Load carrying capacity
150 kg
Not Available
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
Not Available
2.6 L
Gross Weight
305 kg
375 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
1.4 L
2.75 L
Length*Width*Height
1965*701*1150 mm3
2145*785*1090 mm3
Wheelbase
1347 mm
1390 mm
Length
1965 mm
2145 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
170 mm
Height
1150 mm
1090 mm
Width
701 mm
785 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13.7 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
155 Kg
195 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
320 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
270 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Not Available
Yes
USB charging port
Not Available
Yes
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 8AH

Frame Type
Split-Trellis Frame (Tubular), (Sub Frame - Newly engineered bolt-on subframe)
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Not Available
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Not Available
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Navigation assist
Yes
Yes
Riding Modes
Off-Road,Super Moto
Not Available
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Not Available
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
Not Available
2
Engine Temperature Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Yes
Windscreen
Yes
Not Available
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Yes
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Not Available
Yes
Handlebar type
Split handle bar
Not Available
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
Yes
Not Available
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
Digital
Not Available
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Not Available
Yes
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Yes
Yes
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Not Available
Yes

1st Service
Not Available
500 Km/45 Days
2nd Service
Not Available
5000 Km/180 Days
3rd Service
Not Available
10000 Km/365 Days
4th Service
Not Available
15000 Km

Vehicle Warranty
2 Years or 30,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
2
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 160
  • Sporty, race-focused styling
  • Powerful and high-revving engine
Royal Enfield Classic 350
  • Timeless classic-retro design
  • J-series engine is smooth and effortless to ride
  • Neutral and relaxed riding posture
KTM RC 160
  • Narrow pillion seat
  • No traction control
Royal Enfield Classic 350
  • Could get more features
  • Braking could improve
  • Rider footpegs are not well-positioned as they can foul with your shins when crawling through bumper-to-bumper traffic with your feet down
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Latest News on KTM RC 160 and Royal Enfield Classic 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the best, Royal Enfield Classic 350 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Ktm duke 200
  • Both the bikes are good in their own forte. Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a great bike in fact that RE engineers and designers have maintained the charming DNA of its predecessor but without the niggles. It was very easy for the brand to overdo the iconic Classic 350, but they have managed to find the right balance and the updates have been done only where required. On the other hand, the design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which one is good to buy, Royal Enfield Classic 350 or Honda H'ness CB350?
  • Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a great bike in fact that RE engineers and designers have maintained the charming DNA of its predecessor but without the niggles. It was very easy for the brand to overdo the iconic Classic 350, but they have managed to find the right balance and the updates have been done only where required. On the other hand, The Honda CB350 is a great option for someone looking for a retro-styled motorcycle with sprightly performance and the legendary reliability of Honda is an additional bonus. So if you’re looking for the above, the CB350 makes better sense. One thing that goes against the Japanese bike is Honda’s strategy of selling it from the Big Wing dealerships only which restricts access to many buyers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. The Honda CB350 is an impressive bike, but it lacks a bit of soul and character, something that can't be quantified - and something which the Classic 350 has in abundance. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Classic 350 or Meteor 350?
  • Royal Enfield Classic 350 is a great bike in fact that RE engineers and designers have maintained the charming DNA of its predecessor but without the niggles. It was very easy for the brand to overdo the iconic Classic 350, but they have managed to find the right balance and the updates have been done only where required. On the other hand, the new J Platform motor is a clear step change from the UCE, making the Meteor 350 a far more well-rounded motorcycle than any of the previous 350s. It’s not just the engine, the gearbox feels more grown up too and the bike handles itself and its weight rather well. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
|KTM RC 160 Community

KTM RC 160 Vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between KTM RC 160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350?
KTM RC 160 has out rated Royal Enfield Classic 350 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper KTM RC 160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350?
The Royal Enfield Classic 350 is cheaper than KTM RC 160 by ₹5,121.
Which bike offers better performance KTM RC 160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350?
For the STD version, 164.2 cc Petrol engine of RC 160 produces 19 PS @ 9500 rpm of power and 15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Redditch version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Classic 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the KTM RC 160 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Classic 350 and KTM RC 160

Which one do you like more?
RC 160
RC 160
Classic 350
Classic 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. KTM RC 160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350
×