Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh which is Rs. 21,498 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar N160 priced at Rs. 1.16 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar N160 is 44.38 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar N160 is powered by 164.82 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar N160 is available in 6 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 10 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar N160 vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Pulsar N160 Single Channel Single SeatHunter 350 Base
Engine Type 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm

Pulsar N160 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar N160 Single Channel Single SeatRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
444 reviews
853 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.16 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 3,471 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,643 Pulsar N160 Insurance Rs. 10,377 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Displacement
164.82 cc
349 cc
Fuel Supply
Fuel Injection
Electronic Injection
Engine Type
4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
164.82 cc
349 cc
Max Power
16 PS @ 8750 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
BS6.2
BS6.2
Bore
58 mm
72 mm
Stroke
62.38 mm
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
10.3 ± 0.3 :1
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
18.64m
18.13m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
33.91m
32.08m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
52.68m
Mileage (City)
59.11 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
44.38 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
59.11 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.55s
16.40s
Top Speed
120 kmph
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Peak Power
16 PS @ 8750 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Make
...
CEAT
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
25 psi
29 psi
Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
...

Seat height
795 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
1989*743*1050 mm3
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1358 mm
1370 mm
Length
1989 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
160 mm
Height
1050 mm
1070 mm
Width
743 mm
810 mm
Fuel Capacity
14 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
147 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
153 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
Headlight
LED
Halogen Bulb
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 8AH
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
Tubular Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD Connectivity
LCD
Hazard Warning Indicator
High beam indicator
Malfunction Indicator
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Real Time Mileage Indicator
...
Vehicle Location Tracking
...
Pillion Seat
Pillion Grab Rail
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Calls and Messaging
...
Navigation assist
...
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Analogue
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
5
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar N160
  • Engine is very refined and tractable
  • Sporty and confidence-inspiring handling
  • Only bike with dual-channel ABS in the 160cc segment
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Bajaj Pulsar N160
  • Rear monoshock is firm, resulting in a bouncy ride
  • Not-very extensive features list
  • Looks like a clone of the Pulsar N250
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is Bajaj Pulsar N160 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

56% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N160 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2070 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort and safety. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar N160 Hunter 350
Mileage 4.3 3.9
Performance 4.5 4.4
Comfort 4.4 4.5
Maintenance 4.1 3.8
Safety 0.1 0.2
Features 4.4 4.4
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar N160 Community

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort and safety. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹21,498.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the Single Channel Single Seat version, 164.82 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar N160 produces 16 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar N160 has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar N160
Pulsar N160
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×