Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Last Updated: August 2, 2026

Bajaj Pulsar N160 price starts at Rs. 1.16 Lakh, which is Rs. 21,498 cheaper than the base variant of Royal Enfield Hunter 350, priced at Rs. 1.38 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Pulsar N160 offers a claimed 59.11 kmpl, while the Hunter 350 delivers 36.2 kmpl. On the performance front, the Pulsar N160 uses a 164.82cc engine producing 16 PS @ 8750 rpm and the Hunter 350 a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar N160 and Hunter 350, the Pulsar N160 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the Hunter 350 stands out for performance.

...Read More

Pulsar N160 vs Hunter 350 Comparison Summary

Specification Bajaj Pulsar N160Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.16 LakhRs. 1.38 Lakh
Mileage 59.11 kmpl36.2 kmpl
Engine 164.82 cc349 cc
Max power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Kerb weight 147 Kg177 Kg

Pulsar N160 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar N160 Single Channel Single SeatRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
445 reviews
855 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.16 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 16 PS @ 8750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Braking Type Not Available Anti-lock Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 3,471 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,287 Pulsar N160 Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
2 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
2
Claimed Top Speed
120 kmph
114 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
164.82 cc
349 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
5 Speed
Max Power
16 PS @ 8750 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Bore
58 mm
72 mm
Stroke
62.38 mm
85.8 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Fuel Injection
Electronic Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Not Available
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
10.3 ± 0.3 :1
9.5 : 1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Disc
Drum
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Not Available
Anti-lock Braking System

Mileage (Overall)
59.11 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.55s
16.40s
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.64m
18.13m
City Mileage (Tested)
59.11 kmpl
Not Available
Highway Mileage (Tested)
44.38 kmpl
Not Available
Braking 80-0 km/h
33.91m
32.08m
Braking 100-0 km/h
Not Available
52.68m
Estimated Mileage
45-50 kmpl
35-40 kmpl
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
16.55s
6.47s
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.14s
8.87s
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Not Available
Yes
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
Not Available
100 mm
Suspension-Front
Telescopic Forks (37 mm)
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Suspension-Rear
Nitrox Monoshock
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
25 psi
29 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
25 psi
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
28 psi
32 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
32 psi
33 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
Not Available
DOT4
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Tyre Make
Not Available
CEAT
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
Not Available
Yes
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke

Seat height
795 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
Not Available
179 kg
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.8 L
2.6 L
Gross Weight
Not Available
360 kg
Engine Oil Capacity
Not Available
2.2 L
Engine Oil Grade
Not Available
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Length*Width*Height
1989*743*1050 mm3
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1358 mm
1370 mm
Length
1989 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
160 mm
Height
1050 mm
1070 mm
Width
743 mm
810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
14 L
13 L
Kerb Weight
147 Kg
177 Kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Front Brake Size
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
230 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Not Available
Lead Acid
Call/SMS Alerts
Yes
Not Available
Roadside assistance
Not Available
Optional
USB charging port
Yes
Type C
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Battery Capacity
Not Available
12V / 8AH
Projector head light
Yes
Not Available

Frame Type
Tubular Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Digital Display Type
LCD Connectivity
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Yes
Not Available
Riding Modes
Not Available
Yes
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
2
3
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Not Available
Yes
Daytime Running Lamps
Yes
Not Available
Additional Features/Information
Not Available
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Gear Position Indicator
Yes
Not Available
Average Fuel Economy Indicator
Yes
Not Available
ABS Type
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Distance To Empty
Yes
Not Available
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Not Available
Yes
Exhaust Heat Shield
Not Available
Yes
Front Footpegs
Not Available
Forward-set
Body
Not Available
Metal
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Not Available
Yes
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Instrument Console Type
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Not Available
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Mobile Application
Yes
Not Available
Tachometer
Analogue
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Yes

1st Service
500-750 Km / 30-45 Days
500 Km / 2 Months
2nd Service
4500-5000 Km / 8 Months
5000 Km / 6 Months
3rd Service
9500-10000 Km / 1 Year
10000 Km / 12 Months
4th Service
Not Available
15000 Km / 18 Months

Vehicle Warranty
5 Years or 75,000 Km
3 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
5
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar N160
  • Engine is very refined and tractable
  • Sporty and confidence-inspiring handling
  • Only bike with dual-channel ABS in the 160cc segment
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Bajaj Pulsar N160
  • Rear monoshock is firm, resulting in a bouncy ride
  • Not-very extensive features list
  • Looks like a clone of the Pulsar N250
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is Bajaj Pulsar N160 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

55% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N160 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2073 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort and safety. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar N160 Hunter 350
Mileage 4.3 3.9
Performance 4.5 4.4
Comfort 4.4 4.5
Maintenance 4.1 3.8
Safety 0.1 0.2
Features 4.4 4.4
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar N160 Community

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort and safety. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by ₹21,498.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the Single Channel Single Seat version, 164.82 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar N160 produces 16 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 14.65 Nm @ 6750 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar N160 has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar N160
Pulsar N160
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×