Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh which is Rs. 4,914 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 priced at Rs. 1.33 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is 40.36 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 4 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 7 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar NS200 vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Pulsar NS200 STDHunter 350 Base
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4-value FI, Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm

Pulsar NS200 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar NS200 STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Base
Rating
1018 reviews
780 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.33 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4-value FI, Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 3,967 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,922 Pulsar NS200 Insurance Rs. 10,377 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, 4-value FI, Engine
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
349 cc
Max Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
72 mm
Stroke
49 mm
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Electronic Fuel Injection
Compression Ratio
11+/-0.5:1
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
18.13m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
32.08m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
52.68m
Mileage (Overall)
40.36 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.40s
Top Speed
136 kmph
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Peak Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
25 psi
29 psi

Seat height
805 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
2017*804*1075 mm3
2055*810*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1363 mm
1370 mm
Length
2017 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
160 mm
Height
1075 mm
1070 mm
Width
804 mm
810 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
158 Kg
181 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Saddle Height
805 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
270 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
Roadside assistance
...
USB charging port
Headlight
LED
Halogen Bulb
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 8AH
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
Pressed steel Perimeter Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
5
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
75000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
  • Sporty handling characteristics
  • The 6-speed gearbox proves advantageous on the highway
  • Commendable performance considering the price point
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
  • Design looks dated now
  • Lacks adequate features and the absence of dual-channel ABS is a miss
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Bajaj Pulsar NS200?

51% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Bajaj Pulsar NS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 5421 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar NS200 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort and features in your bike. But Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is better on the grounds of performance and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 Pulsar NS200
Mileage 3.9 3.8
Performance 4.4 4.6
Comfort 4.5 4.3
Maintenance 3.8 4.0
Features 4.6 4.5
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Community

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 4,914.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS200 produces 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm of power and 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
Pulsar NS200
Pulsar NS200
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
×