Yamaha FZS V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison
Yamaha FZS V3 vs Yamaha MT 15
Yamaha MT 15 Price starts at Rs. 1.36 lakh which is Rs. 37,320 costlier than Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 98,680. The claimed mileage for the Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha MT 15 is 48.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine where as Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 1 colours. 57% users have chosen Yamaha MT-15 over Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Yamaha MT 15 on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Engine
| Engine Type | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149 cc | 155 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | ||
| Bore | 57.3 mm | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 57.9 mm | 58.7 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel System | ||
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Transistor controlled ignition | Transistor controlled ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.6:1 |
| Engine Immobilizer | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6-Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Braking Type |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.97s | 4.21s |
| Quarter Mile | 20.35 sec @ 100.37 kmph | 17.99 s @ 113.74 kmpl |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 20.48 mm | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
| 20-80 kmph (kickdown) | ||
| 30-70 kmph (3rd gear) | ||
| 40-80 kmph (4th gear) | ||
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 36.44 mm | 38.25 m, 3.92 secm |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | 63.43 m, 4.92 secm | |
| Mileage (City) | 49.31 kmpl | 48.58 kmpl |
| Mileage (Highway) | 55.42 kmpl | 52.02 kmph |
| Mileage (Overall) | 45 kmpl | |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 50 kmpl | |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 20.10s | 12.08s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | ||
| 0-160 kmph | ||
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 20.48 mm | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm |
Suspension
| Chassis Type | ||
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic Fork |
| Chassis | Diamond | Delta Box |
| Suspension-Rear | Swingram | Swingarm |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-R17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 inch | Front :-17 inch Rear :-17 Inch |
| Tyre Make | ||
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | Yes |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 28 psi | |
| Optimum Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion) |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ||
| Length*Width*Height | 1990*780*1080 | 2020*800*1070 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1330 mm | 1335 mm |
| Length | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 155 mm |
| Height | 1080 mm | 1070 mm |
| Seat Height | 790 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 780 mm | 800 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12.8 L | 10 L |
| Kerb Weight | ||
| Total Weight | ||
| Tail Light | Bulb | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | 282 mm | |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 220 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | ETZ-5 |
| Charging Time | ||
| Motor Type | ||
| Motor Power | ||
| Fast Charging | ||
| Battery | ||
| Range | ||
| Head Lamp | ||
| Projector head light | ||
| Pilot Lamps | ||
| LED tail lights | ||
| Seat Opening Switch | ||
| Boot Light | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb |
| Alternator | ||
| Power Modes |
Features
| Cruise Control | ||
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | ||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Handle Type | ||
| Tachometer | ||
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | ||
| Average Fuel economy | ||
| Digital Fuel Indicator | ||
| Distance to Empty | ||
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | Yes |
| External Fuel Filling | ||
| Clock | Digital | |
| Stand Alarm | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ||
| Stepup Seat | ||
| Low Oil Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Projector Headlights | ||
| Passenger Backrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ||
| Shutter Lock | ||
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Central Locking | ||
| Navigation | ||
| Mobile Connectivity | No | |
| EBS | ||
| Service Due Indicator | ||
| Switchable ABS | ||
| DRLs | ||
| Keyless Ignition |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 |
Also Read Comparison Reviews of :
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680vsFZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 160 4VApache RTR 160 4VRs. 92,306
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which one is good for daily commute FZ S BS6 or MT-15?
- It would be too early to give any verdict as Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is not launched yet. We would request you to wait for its launch so that we can share the fruitful comparison among the options.
Q. Whats is the seat height difference Duke 200 and MT-15?
- Not much, the MT is just 5 mm more at 815mm over duke 200 with 810mm. I'm exactly 5'7' and my both legs plant completely while wearing a running shoe and slightly one in air while rocking any sneaker.
- The seat is smaller on the MT-15 &same on Duke 200
Q. I am a guy weighing only 53kgs and 5'4 ft tall will MT-15 suit me. Comparatively the Pulsar NS160, Apache 160 4v and Duke 125 are heavier options?
- I have the same physique as yours, I own an mt15.I have faced any issues till now..Ofcourse I don't have flat foot on both sides but the bike is so nimble and compact and thus you can easily move it in the parking...Also due to it's well designed centre of gravity you will have to use your foot in traffic very rarely....In my opinion take a test ride and if you feel comfortable go for it.👍
- 5'4' height might trouble you in traffic as i won't recommend anyone below 5'6' to go for this bike unless you are rich with experience and handling capability and so as the case with the other options you mentioned.... visit the showroom as weight has nothing to do with the bike decision.... look for the new avenger
- Weight is not much of a problem but the height could be a problem.usualy this bike is well suited for 5'6 to 5'9 people... whatever, if you have previous riding experience then there might be a chance for you to be able to handle the bike well.so take test ride and then decide