Yamaha FZS V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 Comparison
Yamaha FZS V3 vs Yamaha MT 15
Yamaha MT 15 Price starts at Rs. 1.37 lakh which is Rs. 37,920 costlier than Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 priced at Rs. 98,680. The claimed mileage for the Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is 50 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Yamaha MT 15 is 48.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is powered by 149 cc engine where as Yamaha MT 15 is powered by 155 cc engine. Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 is available in 1 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 comes with 1 colours. 58% users have chosen Yamaha MT-15 over Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Yamaha FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Yamaha MT 15 on the basis of price, specifications & other features....read more
FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs MT-15 vs 200 Duke Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 STD | MT-15 STD | 200 Duke BS6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 98,680View On Road Price | Rs. 1.37 lakhView On Road Price | Rs. 1.73 lakhView On Road Price |
| Rating | 4.3 (385 Ratings) |
4.3 (284 Ratings) |
4.2 (772 Ratings) |
| Engine Type | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149 cc | 155 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Colors | |||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.97s | 4.21s | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 50 kmpl | ... | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve | Single Cylinder, 4 Valve, Liquid Cooled, FI, DOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 149 cc | 155 cc | 199.5 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm | 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm | 25 PS @ 10,000 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 12.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 14.7 Nm @ 8500 rpm | 19.3 Nm @ 8000 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 57.3 mm | 58 mm | 72 mm |
| Stroke | 57.9 mm | 58.7 mm | 49 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Chain Drive | Chain Drive | Chain Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol | Petrol |
| Ignition | Transistor controlled ignition | Transistor controlled ignition | Digital Ignition |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.6:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| No Of Gears | 5 Speed | 6-Speed | 6 Speed |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc | Disc |
Performance
| 0-60 kmph (sec) | 5.97s | 4.21s | ... |
| Quarter Mile | 20.35 sec @ 100.37 kmph | 17.99 s @ 113.74 kmpl | ... |
| Braking (60-0 kmph) | 20.48 mm | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm | ... |
| Braking (80-0 kmph) | 36.44 mm | 38.25 m, 3.92 secm | ... |
| Braking (100-0 kmph) | ... | 63.43 m, 4.92 secm | ... |
| Mileage (City) | 49.31 kmpl | 48.58 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (Highway) | 55.42 kmpl | 52.02 kmph | ... |
| Mileage (Overall) | ... | 45 kmpl | ... |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 50 kmpl | ... | ... |
| 0-100 kmph (sec) | 20.10s | 12.08s | ... |
| Braking 60-0 km/h | 20.48 mm | 21.40 m, 3.06 secm | ... |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic Fork | WP-USD Ø 43 mm |
| Chassis | Diamond | Delta Box | Split Steel Trellis Frame |
| Suspension-Rear | Swingram | Swingarm | WP-Monoshock |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-R17 | Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70-17 | Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | |||
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy | Alloy |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 28 psi | ... | ... |
Dimensions
| Dry Weight | ... | ... | 150.3 kg |
| Length*Width*Height | 1990*780*1080 | 2020*800*1070 | 2050*730*810 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1330 mm | 1335 mm | 1367 mm |
| Length | 1990 mm | 2020 mm | 2050 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 mm | 155 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 1080 mm | 1070 mm | 810 mm |
| Seat Height | 790 mm | 810 mm | 810 mm |
| Width | 780 mm | 800 mm | 730 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 12.8 L | 10 L | 13.5 L |
| Tail Light | Bulb | LED | LED |
| Front Brake Diameter | ... | 282 mm | 300 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | ... | 220 mm | 230 mm |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | ETZ-5 | ... |
| Pilot Lamps | ... | ... | |
| LED tail lights | |||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel | Dual Channel |
| Body Type | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes | Sports Naked Bikes |
| Body Graphics | |||
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Seat Type | Single | Single | Split |
| Pass Switch | |||
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Average Fuel economy | ... | ||
| Distance to Empty | ... | ... | |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | |||
| Clock | Digital | ||
| Low Battery Indicator | ... | ... | |
| Stepup Seat | |||
| Low Oil Indicator | |||
| Passenger Footrest | |||
| Passenger Backrest | ... | ||
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Liquid Cooled | Liquid Cooled |
| Console | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Anti Theft Alarm | ... | ... | |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | ... | ... |
Warranty
| Standard Warranty (Years) | 2 | ... | ... |
| Standard Warranty (kilometers) | 30000 | ... | ... |
News Updates on FZ-S Fi Version 3.0 and MT-15
-
Yamaha FZ-FI Version 3.0 Range Gets Recalled Over A Silly Error7,757 motorcycles have been affected
Dec 18, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
Here’s What’s Different Between The Yamaha MT-15 BS6 & MT-15 BS4
Is it just a colour update or is there more to the BS6 MT-15 than meets the eye?
Mar 3, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels -
Yamaha Rides In The BS6 FZ-Fi to India
As reported earlier, the new version is less powerful than the BS4 model
Nov 9, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels -
The Youngest Member of Yamaha’s Dark Side Has Just Been Updated
Yamaha has finally kitted its MT-125 naked with Variable Valve Actuation
Oct 17, 2019 | By Team ZigWheels
Similar Bike Comparisons
-
FZ-S Fi Version 3.0Rs. 98,680vsFZ-S Fi Version 3.0 vs Apache RTR 160 4VApache RTR 160 4VRs. 93,306
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which is best Apache RTR 160 4V or fZ S FI V3?
- For TVS Apache 160 4V>> Yes it is true that disc brake is making sound and even when i contacted the service center for sound issue they told me that it can not be completely removed because the sound is caused by the dust between brake pads and brake discs, so minor brake sound in normal even i haven't seen any bike which do not have brake noise.>> In lighting matter i do not found any issue in that , in spite i found its lighting more sporty than any bike of this 160cc segment.>>Exchust sound choice is also not that creepy,however for that you should take test ride check it byh your self.
- Bro performance ofcourse yamaha and for racer type rider apache but it have many problems 😰 buy yamaha kam se kam itni problem toh dekhni nhi pdegi. buy default apache k carb m or engine k beech ek rubber m problem hai sbhi bike m toh 2018 model m woh change kr rhe hain. One way clutch ki bhi bohot problem hai. jab apki bike new hogi toh sound mast lgega but after some months engine ki taraf se sound tejj ho jayega jiska ilaaz h hi nhi. Gear problem also. And the most problem I'm having that ki iske har month Tapits m dikkat aa rhi hai.
- If you want more power than obviously Apache RTR 160 4V will be the good choice or if anyone want comfortable Ride Refined Engine better mileage and bigger look than yamaha Fzs v3 will be a good choice
Q. WHICH IS BETTER, YAMAHA MT-15 OR PLUSAR NS 200?
- Ns 200 is a 200 cc segment bike.it has more power ful engine more than MT. if you are searching for a comfort,powerful bike both are good.MT is a 150 segment bike .both bikes are different in power. but in looks both are aggressive and muscular. comparitively MT 15 is more aggressive than NS 200.
- Mt15 - bulletproof reliability+ advanced features+satisfactory performance both for daily commute + long ride ....overall you don't have to worry about sudden breakdown or other sudden issuesNs200- very poor reliability+very less advanced features+little bit better performance than mt15 ,but overall a headache as quality is poor ,but till it is good it is more enjoyable ,but at the moment it creates problem it becomes a headache and junk in your garage
- Ns200 it might not have radical looks but it is less costly than mt both are pretty much same as for durability performance no doubt ns riding ergonomics ns for low traffic and highway mt for heavy traffic and city also ns with long wheelbase is more stable than mt
Q. I want to buy Yamaha MT-15. I love this bike so much but my family members including my mom(wearing saree) will sit on this bike is it a good option if not then which is the best option under 2 lakh?
View More Questions
- Both of those bikes mentioned by you have very less chance to come in India ,as Honda is busy with activas and After mt15's not so good business ,Yamaha might not take risk to introduce xsr155 in India
- If 1.8 lakh -1.9 lakh is your budget then the best choice you have is newly launched Gixxer 250 (naked version), it will fulfill your all requirements
- No it is not good at all for pillions , specially for moms.Pillion seat is very small and hard.Go for Fz25 or Apache rtr 200 4v
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
