Suzuki Access 125 vs Suzuki Burgman Street Comparison
Suzuki Access 125 vs Suzuki Burgman Street
Suzuki Burgman Street Price starts at Rs. 71,001 which is Rs. 11,987 costlier than Suzuki Access 125 priced at Rs. 59,014. The claimed mileage for the Suzuki Access 125 is 64 kmpl where as the claimed mileage for Suzuki Burgman Street is 53.5 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Access 125 is powered by 124 cc engine where as Suzuki Burgman Street is powered by 124 cc engine. Suzuki Access 125 is available in 2 different colours while Suzuki Burgman Street comes with 1 colours. 63% users have chosen Suzuki Burgman Street over Suzuki Access 125 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com. Compare Suzuki Access 125 vs Suzuki Burgman Street on the basis of price, specifications & other features.
Access 125 vs Burgman Street Specs Overview
| Specs/Features | Access 125 Special Edition Disc CBS | Burgman Street BS6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Rs. 63,581 | Rs. 77,900 |
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHC | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 124 cc | 125 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm | 8.7 PS @ 6750 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Combi Brake System |
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 64 kmpl | ... |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| ABS | no | ... |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
Engine
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHC | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC |
| Engine Displacement (CC) | 124 cc | 125 cc |
| Power (PS@rpm) | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm | 8.7 PS @ 6750 rpm |
| Torque (Nm@rpm) | 10.2 Nm @ 5000 rpm | 10 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| Emission Type | bs4 | bs6 |
| Bore | 52.5 mm | 52.5 mm |
| Stroke | 57.4 mm | 57.4 mm |
| No Of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| No Of Gears | CVT | CVT |
Brakes
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Drum |
| Braking Type | Combi Brake System | Combi Brake System |
Performance
| Mileage (ARAI) kmpl | 64 kmpl |
Suspension
| Suspension-Front | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Suspension-Rear | Swing Arm | Hydraulic Type |
Tyres
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-12, Rear :-90/100-10 | Front :-90/90-12, Rear :- 90/100-10 |
| Wheel Size | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm | Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-254 mm |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Radial Tyre | Yes | |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Cast |
| Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider) | 29 psi |
Dimensions
| Length*Width*Height | 1870*655*1160 | 1880*675*1140 |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 1265 mm | 1265 mm |
| Length | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 160 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 1160 mm | 1140 mm |
| Seat Height | 773 mm | 780 mm |
| Width | 655 mm | 675 mm |
| Fuel Capacity (Litres) | 5.6 L | |
| Tail Light | Bulb | LED |
Electricals
| Battery Type | Maintenance Free | |
| LED tail lights | ||
| Turn Signal Lamp | Bulb | LED |
Features
| ABS | no | |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Seat Type | Single | Single |
| Pass Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Speedometer | Analogue | Digital |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Digital |
| Charging point | Yes | Yes |
| Low Fuel Warning Lamp | Yes | |
| Clock | ||
| Stepup Seat | With Long Seat | With Long Seat |
| Passenger Footrest | ||
| Carry hook | ||
| Underseat storage | 21.8 L | |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Console | Analogue and Digital | Digital |
| Shutter Lock | Yes | |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Mobile Connectivity | No |
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which scooty should I buy, Suzuki Access 125 or Suzuki Burgman Street. I like a maxi scooty, so which one should I go for?
- The engines are same so if you want a retro look then go for access 125 or of you want fancy look then you can go for burgman.
- If you want a Best Scooter for a long run then go for Suzuki Access 125 - if you want Style ---- Suzuki Burgman Street.
- It depends on your taste both engines are same Bergman heavy and looks modern Access 125 well accepted scooter
Q. Which one is best between Tvs ntorq & suzuki burgman?
- The throttle response of NTorq is sharp and there no vibrations even at the very top of the rev range. In fact, it is one of the very few scooters in India which can go above 100 kmph and we did see the NTorq touching the three digit mark on multiple occasions. But with the extra weight, the NTorq did lose out to the Burgman Street in outright acceleration. But the NTorq has a much better top end when compared to the Burgman Street. In terms of manoeuvrability, it is the NTorq, which feels easier to handle in traffic. You just feel a bit conscious of the bulk of the Burgman Street when filtering through traffic. The NTorq offers better ride quality than the Burgman Street. It has the right amount of balance. It takes on potholes and bumps confidently and is eager when showed a corner too. The Burgman Street loves corners; it is easy to dip into a corner and can hold its line too. But the ride quality is slightly stiffer than we would have liked. Definitely not a deal-breaker though.
- Burgman Street is powered by a 124.3cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine produces 8.7PS of power and 10.2Nm of torque which returns a claimed mileage of 53.5 kmpl. On the other hand, NTORQ 125 comes with 124.79 cc single cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC engine which delivers 9.4 PS/ 10.5 Nm. As for the suspension on the Burgman, it felt a bit on the stiffer side but not uncomfortable in any way. Braking isn’t great either as it lacks feel and bite, although CBS, which comes in as standard, helps shed speeds safely. While, NTORQ 125 has better suspension system and 12 inch tyres rear rear and front which gives better handling and comfortable ride. NTORQ 125 delivers slightly more power whereas, Burgman Street is better fuel efficient and light weight. Click on the given link to compare both the scooters: https://bit.ly/2vzHDZl Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order clear your all doubts. Click on the given link to get your nearest authorized dealership details : https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
- Burgman Street is powered by a 124.3cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine produces 8.7PS of power and 10.2Nm of torque which returns a claimed mileage of 53.5 kmpl. On the other hand, NTORQ 125 comes with 124.79 cc single cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC engine which delivers 9.4 PS/ 10.5 Nm. As for the suspension on the Burgman, it felt a bit on the stiffer side but not uncomfortable in any way. Braking isn’t great either as it lacks feel and bite, although CBS, which comes in as standard, helps shed speeds safely. While, NTORQ 125 has better suspension system and 12 inch tyres rear rear and front which gives better handling and comfortable ride. NTORQ 125 delivers slightly more power whereas, Burgman Street is better fuel efficient and light weight. Click on the given link to compare both the scooters: https://bit.ly/2vzHDZl Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride in order clear your all doubts. Click on the givn link to get your nearest authorised dealership details : https://bit.ly/2jv2aXQ
Q. Which is better, Access 125 or TVS Jupiter?
- Both the scooters are good to buy in their segment. TVS Jupiter offers a lot more features and variety (in the form of variants) than the Activa, thus making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale. Whereas Suzuki has revamped the Access and by the looks of it it looks quite good. It now comes with SEP technology, alloy wheels, an optional front disc and with ride quality as its main focus. Access is a complete package and should help Suzuki make up lost ground despite the competition is rather stiff in the segment. Do take a test ride in order to pick one.
- Access 125 beats the Jupiter, in my opinion.Access is lighter, has more power, a great pick-up, very good mileage, larger boot space and a good riding experience.Jupiter has good mileage too, but Access mileage is also right there.Access is a little more expensive though. But it's worth the extra price.
- TVS Jupiter will be a better pick here as it offers a lot more features and variety. Making it a very sound proposition for those who want a reliable, no-nonsense scooter. The frugal engine, comfortable ride quality and the fact that it is cheaper than the Honda Activa despite offering much more make it our pick as the best 110cc scooter on sale.
Top Commuters Comparisons
Top Cruisers Comparisons
Top Sports Comparisons
