Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF
Last Updated: November 7, 2026
Bajaj Pulsar N160 price starts at Rs. 1.18 Lakh, which is Rs. 24,455 cheaper than the base variant of Suzuki Gixxer SF, priced at Rs. 1.42 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Pulsar N160 offers a claimed 47 kmpl, while the Gixxer SF delivers 45 kmpl. On the performance front, the Pulsar N160 uses a 164.82cc engine producing 16 PS @ 8750 rpm and the Gixxer SF a 155cc engine producing 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm. If you're deciding between the Pulsar N160 and Gixxer SF, the Pulsar N160 is the better pick for affordability and performance.
...Read More
Pulsar N160 vs Gixxer SF Comparison Summary
| Specification | Bajaj Pulsar N160 | Suzuki Gixxer SF |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price (base) | Rs. 1.18 Lakh | Rs. 1.42 Lakh |
| Mileage | 47 kmpl | 45 kmpl |
| Engine | 164.82 cc | 155 cc |
| Max power | 16 PS @ 8750 rpm | 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Kerb weight | 151 Kg | 148 Kg |
-
Bajaj Pulsar N160
Rs. 1.18 Lakh EMI - Rs. 3,521 Get Diwali OffersSuzuki Gixxer SF
Rs. 1.42 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,098 Get Diwali Offers
Pulsar N160 vs Gixxer SF Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar N160 SD USD Single Seat | Suzuki Gixxer SF STD |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
455 reviews
|
10 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Suzuki |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.18 Lakh Check On Road Price | Rs. 1.42 Lakh Check On Road Price |
| Engine Type | 4 Stroke, Single Cylinder, SOHC, 2 Valve, Air Cooled, FI | 4-Cycle, 1-Cylinder, Air Cooled |
| Max Power | 16 PS @ 8750 rpm | 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Wheel Size | Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | Single Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 3,521
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,098
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 10,671 Pulsar N160 Insurance | Rs. 11,082 Gixxer SF Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suspension |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warranty |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Engine is very refined and tractable
- Sporty and confidence-inspiring handling
- Only bike with dual-channel ABS in the 160cc segment
- Sporty styling, Fantastic fit and finish levels, Great handling dynamics
- Rear monoshock is firm, resulting in a bouncy ride
- Not-very extensive features list
- Looks like a clone of the Pulsar N250
- Expensive!, Brakes lack bite and feedback, BS6 update has dropped performance
Is Bajaj Pulsar N160 Better Than Suzuki Gixxer SF?
50% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N160 over Suzuki Gixxer SF in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 766 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Suzuki Gixxer SF on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
On the basis of mileage, performance, comfort, maintenance, safety and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Pulsar N160 | Gixxer SF |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Performance | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Comfort | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Maintenance | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Safety | 0.2 | 2.3 |
| Features | 4.4 | 1.8 |
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Suzuki Gixxer SF
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Suzuki Gixxer SF
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Vs Suzuki Gixxer SF FAQs
Images of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Suzuki Gixxer SF
- Home ›
- New Bikes ›
- Compare Bikes ›
- Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF









