Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX

Last Updated: August 3, 2026

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh, which is Rs. 62,278 cheaper than the base variant of Suzuki V-Strom SX, priced at Rs. 2.00 Lakh. In terms of mileage, the Hunter 350 offers a claimed 36.2 kmpl, while the V-Strom SX delivers 32 kmpl. On the performance front, the Hunter 350 uses a 349cc engine producing 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm and the V-Strom SX a 249cc engine producing 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm. If you're deciding between the Hunter 350 and V-Strom SX, the Hunter 350 is the better pick for affordability and mileage, while the V-Strom SX stands out for performance and a lighter kerb weight.

...Read More

Hunter 350 vs V-Strom SX Comparison Summary

Specification Royal Enfield Hunter 350Suzuki V-Strom SX
Ex-showroom price (base) Rs. 1.38 LakhRs. 2.00 Lakh
Mileage 36.2 kmpl32 kmpl
Engine 349 cc249 cc
Max power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Kerb weight 177 Kg167 Kg

Hunter 350 vs V-Strom SX Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 BaseSuzuki V-Strom SX STD
Rating
855 reviews
3 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 2.00 Lakh Check On Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled 4 Stroke, Single-cylinder, Oil Cooled, SOHC
Max Power 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Suzuki V-Strom SX Colors
Braking Type Anti-lock Braking System Not Available
Wheel Size Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch Front :-482.6 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,965 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 5,759 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,005 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 12,052 V-Strom SX Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Spark Plugs
1 Per Cylinder
1 Per Cylinder
Valves (per cylinder)
2
4
Claimed Top Speed
114 kmph
140 kmph
Emission Norm Compliance
bs6.2
bs6.2
Flex Fuel Blend
E20
E20
Engine Type
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air Oil Cooled
4 Stroke, Single-cylinder, Oil Cooled, SOHC
Engine Displacement
349 cc
249 cc
Gear Box
5 Speed
6 Speed
Max Power
20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
Bore
72 mm
76 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
54.9 mm
Number Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Fuel System
Electronic Injection
Fuel Injection
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Electronic Fuel Injection
Electronic Ignition
Compression Ratio
9.5 : 1
10.7:1

Front Brake
Disc
Disc
Rear Brake
Drum
Disc
Front Caliper
2 Piston
2 Piston
Rear Caliper
1 Piston
1 Piston
Braking Type
Anti-lock Braking System
Not Available

Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
32 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.40s
Not Available
Braking 60-0 km/h
18.13m
Not Available
Braking 80-0 km/h
32.08m
Not Available
Braking 100-0 km/h
52.68m
Not Available
Estimated Mileage
35-40 kmpl
Not Available
Roll-ons 30-70 kmph (3rd Gear)
6.47s
Not Available
Roll-ons 40-80 kmph (4th Gear)
8.87s
Not Available
Fuel Gauge
Digital
Digital

Rear Suspension Preload Adjustment
Yes
Not Available
Rear Suspension Travel / Wheel Travel
100 mm
Not Available
Suspension-Front
Telescopic, 41mm forks
Telescopic, Coil Spring, Oil Damped
Suspension-Rear
Twin shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
Swingarm Type, Coil Spring, Oil Damped

Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
29 psi
22 psi
Front Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
29 psi
22 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
32 psi
29 psi
Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider and Pillion)
33 psi
29 psi
Brake Fluid Grade
DOT4
Not Available
Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/90-19 Rear :-140/70-17
Wheel Size
Front :-17 Inch,Rear :-17 Inch
Front :-482.6 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Make
CEAT
Not Available
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Yes
Not Available
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy

Seat height
790 mm
835 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
Not Available
Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
2.6 L
2.4 L
Gross Weight
360 kg
Not Available
Engine Oil Capacity
2.2 L
Not Available
Engine Oil Grade
SAE 15W 50 API SL grade JASO MA2 semi synthetic
Not Available
Length*Width*Height
2055*810*1070 mm3
2180*880*1355 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1440 mm
Length
2055 mm
2180 mm
Ground Clearance
160 mm
205 mm
Height
1070 mm
1355 mm
Width
810 mm
880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity
13 L
12 L
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
167 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Size
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Size
153 mm
220 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
Not Available
Call/SMS Alerts
Not Available
Yes
Roadside assistance
Optional
Not Available
USB charging port
Type C
Yes
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
12V / 6AH

Frame Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Diamond
Digital Display Type
LCD
LCD
Malfunction Indicator
Yes
Yes
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Vehicle Location Tracking
Not Available
Yes
Pillion Seat
Yes
Yes
Pillion Grab Rail
Yes
Yes
Calls and Messaging
Not Available
Yes
Navigation assist
Not Available
Yes
Riding Modes
Yes
Not Available
Kill Switch
Yes
Yes
Low battery alert
Yes
Yes
No. of Tripmeters
3
2
Rear Footpegs
Yes
Yes
Multi-function Lock
Yes
Not Available
Daytime Running Lamps
Not Available
Yes
Additional Features/Information
Wet sump, forced lubrication, Paper element Air Cleaner
Suzuki Ride Connect
Windscreen
Not Available
Yes
Gear Position Indicator
Not Available
Yes
ABS Type
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Side Stand Warning
Yes
Yes
Physical Key
Yes
Not Available
Exhaust Heat Shield
Yes
Not Available
Front Footpegs
Forward-set
Not Available
Body
Metal
Not Available
Instrument Cluster Control Switchcube
Yes
Not Available
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Roadster Bikes
Adventure Tourer Bikes
Body Graphics
Not Available
Yes
Instrument Console Type
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Not Available
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Beam Switch
Yes
Yes
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Mobile Application
Not Available
Yes
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Yes
Yes
Clock
Yes
Yes
Low Battery Indicator
Yes
Yes
Low Oil Indicator
Yes
Yes
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Not Available
Yes
Service Due Indicator
Yes
Yes
Saree Guard
Yes
Yes
Shift Light
Yes
Yes
Hazard Light Switch
Yes
Not Available

1st Service
500 Km / 2 Months
1000 Kms/30-45 Days
2nd Service
5000 Km / 6 Months
5000 Kms/165-180 Days
3rd Service
10000 Km / 12 Months
10000 Kms/350-365 Days
4th Service
15000 Km / 18 Months
Not Available

Vehicle Warranty
3 Years or 30,000 Km
2 Years or 30,000 Km
Standard Warranty (Years)
3
2
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
30000
30000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • Offering easy accessibility
Suzuki V-Strom SX
  • Has loads of visual presence and looks like a big ADV bike, Handling is impressive by ADV standards, Relaxed riding ergonomics makes it a great tourer
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well
  • Absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity
Suzuki V-Strom SX
  • Stiff rear suspension means off-road performance is poor, Pricing is on the higher side, Flat spot in mid range means one has to work the engine for overtakes

Is Suzuki V-Strom SX Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

80% users have chosen Suzuki V-Strom SX over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1331 users have also rated Suzuki V-Strom SX and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Suzuki V-Strom SX is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort, maintenance and safety in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor V-Strom SX Hunter 350
Mileage 5.0 3.9
Performance 4.0 4.4
Comfort 5.0 4.5
Maintenance 4.0 3.8
Safety 4.0 0.2
Image
Do you own a Car or Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike
Review and Win Banner

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Suzuki V-Strom SX

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Suzuki V-Strom SX FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance in your bike. But Suzuki V-Strom SX is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort, maintenance and safety.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Suzuki V-Strom SX by ₹62,278.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX?
For the Base version, 349 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.21 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 249 cc Petrol engine of V-Strom SX produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Suzuki V-Strom SX and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Which one do you like more?
V-Strom SX
V-Strom SX
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX
×